West Ham Online

Posted: **09 Dec 2024, 09:19**

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 15:46**

Well I think that would affect pretty much everyone in the long run, besides that it would be a quiet forum if you only should comment on things that personally affect you

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 12:19**

Ok, hopefully it doesn't affect you too much.

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 11:48**

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 10:59

And Trump, it was all quite funny the first time round, this time he's dangerous, he doesnt seem to care about how he appears now there's no reelection holding him back, and there's no one left to tell him "no" when he was an incredibly bad idea.

His conversation this week with the Danish Prime Minister hes made it crystal clear he's actually serious about all this shit, are there any Trump supporters among you they don't openly support this shit? there must be one or two of you surely??

What is it that he's serious about that is making you so worried?

I assume you're playing dumb but just in case, his rhetoric about annexing allies territory he's deems important to national security for the main part.

All the nonsense Americans gave France over the Iraq war, freedom fries etc, and how do they thank Denmark for supporting them and losing more people per capita in the war than anyone? threatening to punish or even attack them if they don't give in to Trump's demands

Read a long article by Trump's ghost writer for "Art Of The Deal" recently, If you want to get a measure for then give it a go, you obviously wont though

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 11:07**

collyrob wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 20:32 absolutely horrendous

Maybe the penny will drop with the likes of One Sunny They when they see this, as they seemed to be desperate for something to happen to cover up the cover up.

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 10:59**

And Trump, it was all quite funny the first time round, this time he's dangerous, he doesnt seem to care about how he appears now there's no reelection holding him back, and there's no one left to tell him "no" when he was an incredibly bad idea.

His conversation this week with the Danish Prime Minister hes made it crystal clear he's actually serious about all this shit, are there any Trump supporters among you they don't openly support this shit? there must be one or two of you surely??

What is it that he's serious about that is making you so worried?

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 09:25**

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 09:08
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 08:42
Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 23:26 Were they... y'know...

Either that or deliberately compromised. The real question is why are they former officers? Was this already known and covered up?

One is in his sixties and has retired. I dunno about the other one.

I suspect their names will be interesting to the public, because if they are names of a Pakistani origin the public will understandably think, 'yet another cover up'.

He's in his 60's now but when and why did he "retire"?

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 09:08**

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 08:42
Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 23:26 Were they... y'know...

Either that or deliberately compromised. The real question is why are they former officers? Was this already known and covered up?

One is in his sixties and has retired. I dunno about the other one.

I suspect their names will be interesting to the public, because if they are names of a Pakistani origin the public will understandably think, 'yet another cover up'.

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 08:42**

Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 23:26 Were they... y'know...

Either that or deliberately compromised. The real question is why are they former officers? Was this already known and covered up?

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 08:42**

Fucking hell.

Posted: **30 Jan 2025, 08:39**

collyrob wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 20:32 absolutely horrendous

And now you know why this was ignored for so long. No doubt the tip of the iceberg, probably also involved councillors/politicans and was a nationwide issue. How much influence did the ISI have, do you really think the crosseyed inbreds nicked so far ran this op?

Posted: **29 Jan 2025, 23:26**

Were they... y'know...

Posted: **29 Jan 2025, 22:24**

Jesus christ.

Posted: **29 Jan 2025, 20:32**

absolutely horrendous

Posted: **29 Jan 2025, 18:00**

Yesssss my firend is back from police areszt!

thay can tayke owl wodka but thay never tayke owl picjkle

Posted: **29 Jan 2025, 17:32**

Reading some of One Sunny Days stuff...

It's like the Prof has returned, reinventing themselves as an expert sociopolitical analyst.

Posted: **29 Jan 2025, 16:52**

This Labour investment package
Why is the taxpayer having to fork out so Man Utd can have a stadium uplift, that looks like a doughnut with a Wimpy bendy sausage on top?

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 21:24**

I see the truth hurt.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 20:49**

Christ on a bike! Did you even read that shit back before you posted it? I've got nothing to add. You're clearly far better at showing yourself up than I ever can.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 18:39**

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025, 18:30 Ah, I see. These violent child molesters, getting away with their crimes for years weren't prejudiced about which kiddies they raped so, move along, nothing to see here.

Well, I'll answer your post in four parts.

1) Firstly, literally nobody has sought to justify or hide these horrible crimes. The fact you are pretending they are is telling, as it implies you haven't a leg to stand on.

2) The Muslim rape gangs are NOT comparable, since in the case of the Scottish crimes, the police, social services and Procurator Fiscal's office have not been complicit in a race-based cover-up. Your deliberate ignoring of this factor is also rather telling.

3) As I'm sure you are aware, it is a matter of LAW (though clearly not in justice) that racially aggravated offences are more serious than offences where no such motivation is present. I didn't make the law, I suspect that was done by your leftie fellow-travellers, but that's the law.

4) None of the above can disguise your obvious and disgusting glee.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 18:30**

Ah, I see. These violent child molesters, getting away with their crimes for years weren't prejudiced about which kiddies they raped so, move along, nothing to see here.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 18:01**

Cap Mong

You seem quite gleeful that young people in Scotland have been raped and sexually assaulted.

It's almost as if you had been hoping for such a case to come along so you could draw false comparisons with the deliberate and industrial-scale targeting and raping of young girls based on their skin colour and the subsequent cover-up of those crimes by the authorities in order not to inflame racial tensions.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 16:57**

You appear to have read something that neither I or goose have suggested.

Standard for you.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 16:47**

Ah, it's because they're not Muslims, then. Thank you for confirming it's only Muslim paedos that get you worked up.

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 16:39**

I'm assuming there's many of these scottish pedo gangs as well, seeing as One Sunny They has made the comparison?

Posted: **27 Jan 2025, 16:30**

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025, 16:22 Another paedo gang been jailed. They seemed to have slipped through the radar for 13 years. For some reason Elon Musk, Nigel Farage, Laurence Fox and their supporters are being very quiet about this one. (Can forgive Tommy Robinson, this time, seeing he's banged up for bullying a child. I'm sure had he been free, he would have shown up at the court trying to disrupt the trial by videoing people.)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2dxj570n21o

I would genuinely be interested to see if those Scottish paedos were given similar sentences to the Muzzy paedos.

West Ham Online

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)