AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Paul Pelosi
-
- Posts: 680
- Old WHO Number: 33812
Paul Pelosi
Does anyone else smell a crock of shit here? A bloke in his underpants breaks into the hone of the second most powerful person in the US? Perhaps he just wanted some investment advice since the Pelosi’s out perform Warren Buffet?
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: Paul Pelosi
"You-hoo, snowflake! The bloke has clearly been a loon for some time, but his postings directly indicate a turn to support a-anon and this attack on Pelosi is a direct link to Trump and GOP attacks on her. And yes - watching you try to selectively ignore the parts you don’t like and choose “the media want you to think this is about Trump”, is weak and was entirely predictable. Those narratives you construct don’t get any better do they."
-
- Posts: 271
- Old WHO Number: 234553
- Been liked: 1 time
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: Paul Pelosi
"Without bothering to read all of what is bound to be some attempt to make some minor point and flog it to death - Yes pedant - you made a generic and weak attempt to call out some sort of adherence to the “lefty” mainstream media. It was shit and bore no relation to what was being said, and did nothing to undermine the main point that gay whore conspiracy theory had zero facts or evidence to support it."
-
- Posts: 526
- Old WHO Number: 18101
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 68 times
Re: Paul Pelosi
"joyo 1:15 Tue Nov 1 I guess that is the issue, your hatred of Trump made you jump to the conclusion that this apparently very unhinged man was a Trump supporter. Many people dislike Pelosi, and a number of those also dislike Trump - I am one of them. There are people out there that hate governments in general and if you live in Berkeley, Pelosi is the closest high profile representation of government. So if you are mentally ill or whatever, there are more than one reason to attack her. One could say you took your own feelings and an initial report and it made you post a conspiracy theory about this man. Conspiracies are often built on jumping on the first report you see, which what you have done here."
Re: Paul Pelosi
Talkshite Miike 12.24....and here's proof of what l mean as mentally ill with this moron.
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 631
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 87 times
- Been liked: 146 times
Re: Paul Pelosi
"Capitol Man 9:09 Mon Oct 31 Pedant - you do understand that nine of what I’ve said has come 'from cnn and that yours are full of shit as per usual.' I hate to have to give you yet another English lesson, but, with a deep sigh, here we go. 'CNN' is not the same thing as 'CNN and the like'. If I had claimed that your 'official reports' had come from CNN, you might have a point. But I didn't. Your 'official reports' are nothing of the sort and are just made up stuff you have glean from the likes of CNN. You see what I did there. Calling me a pedant when I pull you up on a point of fact doesn't make your untruth go away. By all means carry on if it makes you feel better inside your head, but it won't make other posters think you have 'won', no matter how hard you wish it would. As far as I can make out, at the time you posted the only things that could possibly be described as 'official reports', which were deliberately ambiguous - I don't blame the police for that, they have legal issues to deal with. There were reports with direct quotes of what the emergency operator said, to the effect that the caller called the invader 'Dave' - but that is both unofficial and entirely detrimental to your argument. What are these 'official reports' and where could I have found them at the time? Did you by any chance, precis some of the speculation on CNN and the like and present it as fact? Surely not? I'd have replied sooner, but real life got in the way. Nice to see you get smashed to pieces by all and sundry in the meantime."
Re: Paul Pelosi
"Pwoper 8.55...so I'm a Dem supporter?Really?I'm English and can't vote in US even though my grandmother was American citizen. If l could vote there l would probably vote Republican,but never if Trump was running. You know fuck all about me,l think Biden is a divi senile old fool,but l detest Trump even more. If you look at my posts none are pro Democrats,l just hate conspiracy theorists with a passion as l view them as mentally ill."
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3036
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: Paul Pelosi
"the 'unknown' 3rd person was chauncey biden. him & the creep pelosi were split roasting the right wing, maga activist"
-
- Posts: 271
- Old WHO Number: 234553
- Been liked: 1 time
Re: Paul Pelosi
I notice that the media are now claiming there wasn’t an unknown 3rd person that opened the door to the police Capitol Man - how do you square that with the FBI report you provided that states clearly that an unknown third person opened the door to the police? It’s as if the media are working hard to spin this to their advantage - or it’s all just conspiracy theory rubbish.
-
- Posts: 680
- Old WHO Number: 33812
Re: Paul Pelosi
"How he avoided being spotted by a security team at that time of night, and managed to gain entry into the house without setting off any alarms could no doubt be cleared up when the CCTV is released. Also the body cam from the police will clear things up."
-
- Posts: 271
- Old WHO Number: 234553
- Been liked: 1 time
Re: Paul Pelosi
"The only facts we do know are these: A left wing, hemp selling, BLM supporting, nudist activist broke into Pelosi’s house avoiding all security and then whilst in his underpants allowed Paul Pelosi to go to the bathroom to make a 911 call where he explained his “friend” “David” was there. The police arrived, an unknown third man let them in and found the two men wrestling on the floor in their underpants on the floor. And now the mainstream media are stating the attacker was an unhinged right wing conspiracy nut who was looking for Nancy Pelosi. That’s all we know. joyo and Capital Man are staunch dem supporters so will believe the dem supporting medias narrative as it fits their world view. To them anything else is nonsense because they were told so. Others will question the mainstream version because there are too many odd events in the story. To them they see this being used for political advantage before the mid terms and are uneasy with the cynical narrative. Based on the facts, make your own mind up. It’s a rare thing these days. The convenience age means that most of us have our minds made up for us based on the news and social media algorithm we are in."
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3969
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 395 times
Re: Paul Pelosi
There's an awful lot missing/we are not being told here. What IS amusing (read: very revealing) is that (some) posters fill in those gaps to produce a potential narrative that aligns with their own general views then proceed to scream (and thcweam and thcweam) at other posters doing exactly the same thing but coming up with an alternative - equally plausible - potential narrative. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzg6r0oPIZw
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: Paul Pelosi
FFS sloppy - go read the fucking charges and stop making such a cսnt of yourself. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/crime/read-federal-charges-paul-pelosi-attacker
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 202 times
Re: Paul Pelosi
"'his apparent online history of supporting conspiracy theories ' His apparent online history that dates back to the day after Pelosi's DUI arrest, on questionabe registered blogs, one on which wasn't used for 15 years."
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: Paul Pelosi
"ironsofcanada 12:42 Tue Nov 1 Re: Paul Pelosi You don’t think the initial reports of him saying “where’s Pelosi?”, and his apparent online history of supporting conspiracy theories may have led to some initial indications then Snowflake - or does that not fit with those poor constructed narratives your construct in your mind. How is that young Turk media empire by the way?"
-
- Posts: 526
- Old WHO Number: 18101
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 68 times
Re: Paul Pelosi
joyo 12:25 Tue Nov 1 Ha. Too quick on the post. Do you apply that both directions? There were claims that this seemingly very unhinged man was a Trump supporter. That was a theory advanced in media and that was you what you called him early in the thread. Was there more than zero evidence of that at the time you posted it? What prevents that from being a conspiracy theory?
-
- Posts: 526
- Old WHO Number: 18101
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 68 times