West Ham Online

"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."

XKhammer wrote: ↑19 Apr 2025, 09:51

goose wrote: ↑19 Apr 2025, 08:46 This is my proudest moment on WHO. Do I get a medal?

It’s true though, why is there no legal debate on what is a man? Are men not deemed as important or special?

Clearly you are into men rather than women 

As for getting a medal that is very rare for an Eyetie 

 

The lines get a bit blurred when you have someone that is intersex. As a kid one of our crowd was very proud to show us his bits, which were a cross between a penis and a vagina, it was all very weird and I always wondered how he got on later in life.

goose wrote: ↑19 Apr 2025, 08:46 This is my proudest moment on WHO. Do I get a medal?

It’s true though, why is there no legal debate on what is a man? Are men not deemed as important or special?

This is my proudest moment on WHO. Do I get a medal?

It’s true though, why is there no legal debate on what is a man? Are men not deemed as important or special?

goose has hit the front in the race to be WHO misogynist of the year.

goose wrote: ↑19 Apr 2025, 08:17
2. why is nobody interested in the definition of a ‘man’?

Two very simple things landed with me during this debate:

1. women are born, not created. You cannot become a woman.

2. why is nobody interested in the definition of a ‘man’?

Very simple answer to the whole 'who pisses where' debate.

If you were born with a cock, you use the gents.

Couldn't be simpler.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 11:29

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 14:14 It took over  a generation for the disabled/ambulantly-challenged/whatever fucking label they want this week to become integrated into public society.

That integration progressed at a speed society could afford. Non-binaries will need to accept about the same rate for their integration (whether they fucking like it or not - unless they want to fund such integration - in a way current society accept such that it takes place earlier.).

It's not for them to decide what other people want their money/taxes spent on, and neither should they have additional, disproportionate authority over society's public spending budget.

A certain portion of teenagers had always had identity crises and acted like weird cunts. Each generation manifests itself differently and for the last 70/80 years usually aligned with music.

As modern music is shit and left wing nonces run amok in positions of influence the latest generation's identity crisis has taken the shape of this stupid shit but unlike mods, punks, goths etc these fuckwit won't easily shift back into society they'll wear the scars of their teenage agnst like Aldo Raine took a blade to their forehead.

Suicide rates are going to rocket.

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 14:14 It took over  a generation for the disabled/ambulantly-challenged/whatever fucking label they want this week to become integrated into public society.

That integration progressed at a speed society could afford. Non-binaries will need to accept about the same rate for their integration (whether they fucking like it or not - unless they want to fund such integration - in a way current society accept such that it takes place earlier.).

It's not for them to decide what other people want their money/taxes spent on, and neither should they have additional, disproportionate authority over society's public spending budget.

Council Scum" wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 13:08

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 12:56 A ruling of the bleeding obvious:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Why, when the obvious is stated, do "Trans" immediately say they are now scared and feel threatened... from who? 

I'm interested to know how people think this ruling is going to work, in practice? Presumably, it works both ways and big beardy trans men will now have to use the ladies loos, if they're caught short, out in public. Sure all the women cheering this ruling will be delighted with that. Also, how do you check if someone going into the loo is trans or not? Employ a load of trans checkers to stand outside public loos, grabbing everyone who looks a bit butch, between the legs, Crocodile Dundee style, on the way in?

Council Scum" wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 13:08

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 12:56 A ruling of the bleeding obvious:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Why, when the obvious is stated, do "Trans" immediately say they are now scared and feel threatened... from who? 

RBshorty wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 14:29 As sane as this ruling is. As long as someone is willing to throw money at the argument. And an idiot is happy to shout it out on the media. Then all that happens in the can gets kicked down the road.

PEOPLE DON"T LIKE CHANGE. THEY JUST DOUBLE DOWN.!

Blokes aren't women no matter what bra, make up and wigs that put on badly.

As sane as this ruling is. As long as someone is willing to throw money at the argument. And an idiot is happy to shout it out on the media. Then all that happens in the can gets kicked down the road.

PEOPLE DON"T LIKE CHANGE. THEY JUST DOUBLE DOWN.!

It took over  a generation for the disabled/ambulantly-challenged/whatever fucking label they want this week to become integrated into public society.

That integration progressed at a speed society could afford. Non-binaries will need to accept about the same rate for their integration (whether they fucking like it or not - unless they want to fund such integration - in a way current society accept such that it takes place earlier.).

It's not for them to decide what other people want their money/taxes spent on, and neither should they have additional, disproportionate authority over society's public spending budget.

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 12:56 A ruling of the bleeding obvious:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

A ruling of the bleeding obvious:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cvgq9ejql39t

Listening to Charlton v Cambridge on BBC London and the commentators are crying/whinging because a Charlton fan pretended to give the opposition player the ball and then threw it away.

Can't have a laugh or joke anymore

Hang on to yer actual laptops...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 31890.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/0 ... years-ago/

This is the sort of bloke, the likes of Blair, Brown, Cameron, May, Johnson, Sunak and Starmer have allowed to destroy our country.

Very honourable and  culturally enriching for us.

That scouse transvestite bloke was doing a show about dogs but he popped off.  His place is now being taken by a grossly obese black woman called Alison Hammond who seems to always be on TV, despite the problem of her having no discernible talent. I looked her up before posting and it appears she was a contestant on Big Brother; enough said. Now a professional box ticker.

Westham67 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025, 16:51 As a minorty ginge I can say there enough benders in the acronym itself  LGBT to the replace the gay with ginge

As a minorty ginge I can say there enough benders in the acronym itself  LGBT to the replace the gay with ginge