West Ham Online

"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."

"But that wasn’t my argument H&P, “many people” does not equate “10” for starters. And I’d like you to give me an example of where millions of people (not 100) have lived together, all sharing the same common language, (by that I mean beliefs), without some feeling discriminated against."

Hammer and Pickle 6:40 Mon Jul 17 Picjkle do experimont on this. He call it The Bench Krew Vodka Hunger Game Good times

No it means a random sample of 10 (ten) adult individuals with a common language. Infect them with an ideology that tells them any one personal characteristic indicates a threat and observe normal relations deteriorate.

"Btw this “put ten people in the room” thing, is this a board game? Bit like Cluedo?"

And as if by magic. I do hope you haven’t brought Debbie McGee with you.

And as if by magic. I do hope you haven’t brought Debbie McGee with you.

Absolute brain rot. Put ten people in a room together and they will kill each other if you make them believe each poses a threat to the other. Those same ten people will get along just fine if they are relaxed and have something fun and useful to do together.

"Debs, to answer your question about discrimination. I think it’s impossible to have many people living together, where there are so many different views and hard held beliefs, for there not to end up with groups feeling discriminated against. I guess with most things there is eventually a middle ground found, and the conditions for honest and polite debate. What I think is wrong though, is one group in society DEMANDING everything, and if anybody has a differing view and wants to politely argue the point, then the ‘argument’ (demand) is closed down. Can you answer my one about the vicar, do you not think he was discriminated against?"

I typed really not read only!

No-one can read only disagree with that Mike. I expect someone might try because it’s WHO…

"""That's not a stat "" And that is not of primary importance. Kids benefit from growing up in a loving, stable environment. Some, agreed, turn out as bad-un's (edgy and right-on is the hip WHO description of such people, I believe), Real characters at school an' that. Most, though, integrate seamlessly into society. Kids can normally deal with alternative viewpoints by matching them up with the (reasonably stable, slow changing) environment within which they are/feel most comfortable. Parental figures provide much of that stability in their eyes as they themselves are not yet worldly-wise. Mum says don't stick your finger in the flame of a candle for a very good reason. Kids will inevitably try it and soon learn that they need to pay heed to what mum (and dad) says about other things. What we're seeing now is those parental figures being encouraged - forced even - to throw instability at an environment that should be anything but. That encouragement seems to come from people with no direct parental experience of their own - no skin in the game is another way of putting it."

That's not a stat

"Here's a stat for you. When my ex- phoned me at my flat in Stockholm and gave me the ultimatum of"" picking our kids up tomorrow or they go into a care home"", ""Care Home"" was never a starter in my mind and I'd already planned the next few days before the phone call ended. I think she thought I was some sort of ""jet-setter"" what with living in ""glamorous Stockholm (STOCKHOLM)"" and all that, and would never be able to actually go and collect them (like some sort of parcel the postman couldn't deliver). In all the time the kids were with me I never, ever, mentioned the care home option their mother gave, but it seems that they were aware of it, The bottom line is, if parents (or A parent) give their kids time, love and attention, those kids will, in all probability, turn out to be decent adults. None of those attributes/requirements is dependent on parental marital or sexual status as the only important element of the equation here is the kids - a viewpoint many on here seem unable or unwilling to take."

And stepped into a 2023 bud light commercial.

"Yes nerd very good point..let's have a look.at these stats, whose produced them.and if they have come from.studies how reliable are they? Do any of you actually know any sets of gay parents? Actually have any of you stepped out of the world of the 1950s OXO.advert yet?"

"""Child and partner abuse statistics in same sex relationships (especially lesbian) are far worse than in normal relationships"" This is a lie, as is the claim that homosexual couples are preferred over hetero-normative ones in assigning children for adoption. The Kremlin narrative is strong in you numpties today."

"Oh come on, nobody take Debs or westammer seriously."

"""The likes of Debs and westammer are cheering on the destruction of innocent children in the name of a perverted, trendy ideology that makes them feel better, hang the consequences"" But makes them think they are really understanding of the issues. So it doesn't matter about facts."

That's quite interesting Rios can I have a look at these stats .

"Not a lot of mention of the rights of children to grow up in a NORMAL household with a mother and father. Child and partner abuse statistics in same sex relationships (especially lesbian) are far worse than in normal relationships. A bit like statistics that show the high suicidal tendency rate in people who identify as trans, which either stays the same or goes up (or they actually go through with suicide) post surgery. Its also quite interesting to look at the number of gay male couples who state a preference for a son only rather than a daughter. The likes of Debs and westammer are cheering on the destruction of innocent children in the name of a perverted, trendy ideology that makes them feel better, hang the consequences"

I hear they are turning the Trocadero center into a mosque. What’s next Westminster Abbey?

"No it's not Deb's. I wrote why in the post you read, a heterosexual couple should be given priority because the research on wellbeing overwhelmingly supports the notion of a child having a mother and father in their life. Men and women are different and offer different qualities which is what benefits the child. It's funny how millions of years of evolution brought us to that point. Almost uncanny."

Hermit you do realise that your assertion that straight couples should be given priority would also be for ideological reasons don't you?

"That’s a weighty claim, Muppet. I assume you have a body of evidence equal to its weight to back it up. Or shall we just assume you’re full of shit as usual?"

"I agree with that Fifth and the evidence supports it. In reality though, there's no shortage of heterosexual couples willing to adopt babies and despite all the evidence suggesting that it is healthier for a child's development to have a mother and father, gays are often given priority for purely ideological reasons when on reality, they should only be used as a last resort to prevent a child growing up in care."