Page 16 of 20

Paul Pelosi

Posted: 29 Oct 2022, 20:26
by Kaiser Zoso
Does anyone else smell a crock of shit here? A bloke in his underpants breaks into the hone of the second most powerful person in the US? Perhaps he just wanted some investment advice since the Pelosi’s out perform Warren Buffet?

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 13:46
by Jaan Kenbrovin
"Clever enough to break into the house without waking Pelosi or any neighbours, and avoided all potential security when stealthily smashing toughened glass to create a hole big enough for big foot to enter. But dumb enough to pick a day Nancy wasn’t home. Clever enough to take zip ties but dumb enough to decide not to use them when confronting Pelosi in his bedroom. Instead he woke him and let him use his phone in the bathroom, whilst he decided to wait for Nancy to come home after 2:30 am like time wasn’t an issue and she was expected to be back anytime soon. Then somehow Pelosi decides to confront the attacker despite a coded call for help, and the police arrive to watch the attacker beat Pelosi with no armed response. Seems legit."

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 13:45
by Mike Oxsaw
collyrob 1:32 Mon Oct 31 Re: Paul Pelosi I think literally everyone knew what joyo meant by literally. Corrected it for you. HTH.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 13:36
by Kaiser Zoso
I’m surprised anyone would spend any time trying to work out what Joyceys on about.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 13:36
by Kaiser Zoso
I’m surprised anyone would spend any time trying to work out what Joyceys on about.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 13:32
by collyrob
I think everyone knew what joyo meant by literally.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 13:26
by ironsofcanada
"Fo the Communist 11:05 Mon Oct 31 Ha. The very old chesnut was me pulling you - who was using a journalistic past to lend weight to your argument - up on your misuse of ""ironic"" ala Alanis Morissette, not ""literally"". Your use spoke against your argument. Joyo was misrepresenting the actual area where this incident took place. I used his use of ""literally"" to call him on it. He doubled down instead of correcting the substance of his argument, so I went where the logic dictated."

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 12:58
by Kaiser Zoso
"These zip ties — they took two days to drop out from his boxers did they? He must be fucking useless as an assassin, he remembers zip ties, but has to borrow Pelosi's hammer, and lets him pop into the bathroom to make a quick call before getting into a clinch. These hippy BLM supporting far right nut jobs that live in Berkeley. FMOB"

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 12:54
by Mike Oxsaw
"Never mind all this bollocks: the underpants, that's what's important here. Were they kosher Calvin's or out of the Walmart well-past-their sell-by-date bin?"

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 12:52
by Northern Sold
MrTrentReznor 4:57 Mon Oct 31 Re: Paul Pelosi CM 2:40. No. Wasn't asking for a friend. You might think what I said isn't true but my wife reckons approx 20% of males are gay Well good 45% I reckon on this thread...

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 12:49
by collyrob
Why did Elon delete his tweet to Hilary about this?

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 12:42
by Don Ravioli
You have to give credit to these lefties and their news outlets they control. Get their highly unbelievable stories straight really quickly and their gullible audiences lap it up. Far right hippie. Heard it all now.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 12:36
by Hermit Road
"I'm willing to believe a lot of things but I'm not willing to believe that a nudist-activist who lives in a San Francisco hippie collective, adorned with BLM and Rainbow flags is a far right attacker? I'm even prepared to be called a conspiracy nut for not believing it"

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 11:08
by Lee Trundle
Interesting choice of code talk that for Paul Pelosi.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 11:05
by Fo the Communist
"ironsofcanada 2:57 Mon Oct 31 Not this old chestnut again, mate. You literally don't seem to understand and accept that, however annoying, the meaning of the word had expanded over time"

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 11:03
by joyo
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/paul-pelosi-david-depape-dispatch-audio-b2213421.html%3famp Think the rent boy theory and known to each other is now blown out of the water

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 10:49
by joyo
Kremlin Zoso 7.16 you still sticking to your fairytales??? https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/10/30/politics/pelosi-attack-suspect-david-depape-bag-zip-ties/index.html

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 09:19
by mashed in maryland
MrTrentReznor 4:57 Mon Oct 31 Gay geezer I work with told me about half the blokes on Grindr have wives and kids. Wouldn't be unusual for one of that persuasion to exaggerate a bit but got no reason to think he was lying

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 04:57
by MrTrentReznor
CM 2:40. No. Wasn't asking for a friend. You might think what I said isn't true but my wife reckons approx 20% of males are gay & she hasn't even met you. The reason for her 20% estimate is that in the airline industry there are a lot of gay guys working in the business. Some of those guys had wives in the Heathrow area & gay lovers 'down route'. It is not a wild conspiracy theory that there are gay men that have female wives to fit in with perceived conventional society. Thanks for the 'big boy' reference. Much appreciated.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 04:52
by Mike Oxsaw
"Is calling a group of posters ""Ladies"" an official, left-approved insult now?"

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 03:00
by Capitol Man
ironsofcanada 2:57 Mon Oct 31 Re: Paul Pelosi = Snowflake crying because someone responds to a comment he makes online.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 02:59
by Capitol Man
gph 2:40 Mon Oct 31 Re: Paul Pelosi Oh snowflake is as full of shit as they come. It’s funny to see his little constructs fall apart as soon as a gentle breeze of reality sets in though.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 02:57
by ironsofcanada
gph 2:40 Mon Oct 31 Ha. Your sole comment on this thread being about me confirms everything you have made evident about yourself over the years. Joyo had every opportunity to correct or explain his use of language without you riding to his rescue on your white steed. No matter how much it seemingly still irks you years later that I have needed to correct you a number of times.

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 02:57
by Capitol Man
"Kaiser Zoso 7:16 Sun Oct 30 Re: Paul Pelosi Perfect example of how the usual fuckwit here gets mugged-off by what he reads online. Official reports from sources that have to stand behind what they say are disregarded in exchange for any old bullshit he finds online. Suddenly he’s a leading authority on Pelosi’s fucking husband - coincidentally the same day the right wing bullshit machine has decided to focus on it. The same right wing bullshit machine that spreads conspiracy theories and threatens civil war, and then when a loon takes them seriously it makes shit up as an excuse. Now why don’t you ladies admit you don’t have a fuckiung clue what went on."

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 02:40
by gph
"IOC pretending he doesn't know that many people misuse the word ""literally"" to make out that joyo is a liar is the highlight of this thread. Confirms everything I believe about this person."

Re: Paul Pelosi

Posted: 31 Oct 2022, 02:40
by gph
"IOC pretending he doesn't know that many people misuse the word ""literally"" to make out that joyo is a liar is the highlight of this thread. Confirms everything I believe about this person."