Russell Brand

[Pentonville]

Dispatches tonight could be about him so he has jumped in first dismissing claims and rumours and saying anything he did in past was consensual. No doubt it will be said that this is The Matrix coming after him due to his opposition to mainstream media.

[Swiss.]

Mike Oxsaw 3:07 Wed Sep 20 Oxbore if they bring back Jackanory you should present it with your stories. Itches beard.

[Side of Ham]

Hahahaha! You heroes……

[Mike Oxsaw]

Doing that trip twice - flying back and forth then announcing my lack of vaccination (again) at the time would have been worth the ticket price alone just to bask in the iridescent glow of the MSM led flock of sheep doubling down.

[Mike Oxsaw]

Doing that trip twice - flying back and forth then announcing my lack of vaccination (again) at the time would have been worth the ticket price alone just to bask in the iridescent glow of the MSM led flock of sheep doubling down.

[Lee Trundle]

"""So complete was the brainwashing, the mood was definitely ""Shut the fuck up and take one for the team, you scared-of-needles, bottle-job loser"". Nice. Paranoia doesn't even come close...and a fair few are desperately clinging today to that stance, even though every single reason they were given to take the vaccine has resoundly been blown out the water with as much force as the brave vaccineers blow their own beliefs out their arse."" As a fellow PURE BLOOD, I agree. I find it quite funny those that want to either forget or change the narrative. They just hate to be wrong about anything and will probably go to the grave with their opinion."

[Mike Oxsaw]

"I do know (I was there, you were not) that when I flew out of Oman UNVACCINATED, I had to bring a doctor's note from the country's leading cardiovascular expert, endorsed by the country's Chief Medical Officer explaining why I should be allow to fly in such a condition. Even then the desk clerk ran it up the chain of command before they finally checked me in. Luckily (for them), there were only 12 passengers on the flight so they sat me well away from everyone. More polava followed when I landed as I was whisked of to isolation. On here certain posters were going incandescent with rage at the fact that I would not be getting the vaccine, even after I explained why. So complete was the brainwashing, the mood was definitely ""Shut the fuck up and take one for the team, you scared-of-needles, bottle-job loser"". Nice. Paranoia doesn't even come close...and a fair few are desperately clinging today to that stance, even though every single reason they were given to take the vaccine has resoundly been blown out the water with as much force as the brave vaccineers blow their own beliefs out their arse."

[Mike Oxsaw]

"I do know (I was there, you were not) that when I flew out of Oman UNVACCINATED, I had to bring a doctor's note from the country's leading cardiovascular expert, endorsed by the country's Chief Medical Officer explaining why I should be allow to fly in such a condition. Even then the desk clerk ran it up the chain of command before they finally checked me in. Luckily (for them), there were only 12 passengers on the flight so they sat me well away from everyone. More polava followed when I landed as I was whisked of to isolation. On here certain posters were going incandescent with rage at the fact that I would not be getting the vaccine, even after I explained why. So complete was the brainwashing, the mood was definitely ""Shut the fuck up and take one for the team, you scared-of-needles, bottle-job loser"". Nice. Paranoia doesn't even come close...and a fair few are desperately clinging today to that stance, even though every single reason they were given to take the vaccine has resoundly been blown out the water with as much force as the brave vaccineers blow their own beliefs out their arse."

[Takashi Miike]

"oh look, jerzy bandera thinks the last three years were funny. fucking long necked boot licking collaborator cսnt"

[Hammer and Pickle]

"“you had a government nudge unit tasked to coerce people in to taking a product that's probably harmed many people.” That sounds proper dramatic, sinister and cloak-and-dagger. What actually happened?"

[BRANDED]

Build Back Better. How did that go?

[joyo]

"Talkingshite Icke 1.25...what a miserable existence you live,all doom and gloom,even the football you're very anti,your response everytime to others is to call them cunts 8 millon in UK on the happy tabs,l think it should be 8,000,001 with you miserable bollocks"

[Eerie Descent]

"""Also people were free to decide whether to get vaccined or not"" Oh, come on ffs. What a glib way of remembering the reality of what was actually going on."

[Takashi Miike]

"joyo 11:55 Wed Sep 20 keep taking those boosters, you fucking obedient braindead cսnt"

[wils]

The Telegraph article BRANDED posted below is spot on. Brand deserves to be tried and convicted (if allegations are true). But the BBC and Channel 4 were his enablers and in my eyes as guilty as him. They put him on the screen and presented him as an edgy taboo breaking comedian who we should all laugh at and perhaps realign our own moral standards with. And now they wag their finger claim the moral high ground. I have lost count how many of these abusers and outright nonces have been pushed by the BBC over the last few decades. And they all knew but turned a blind eye while it suited them.

[BRANDED]

"Covid means Coronavirus disease SARS-CoV-2 is a strain of coronavirus that causes COVID-19, the respiratory illness that caused death in people at the same average age as normal life. Most likely adapted in a lab in Wuhan, but the Chinese won't share enough information to know. The lab was funded in part by Western interests. Interesting Western interests. None this is conspiratorial."

[Mike Oxsaw]

"Why was Covid called Covid? Didn't the budget stretch far enough for a half decent advertising agency to come up with an appropriately scary name - Tyrannosaurus Flu, for example. I'd have begged (BEGGED) to have shots against THAT killer bastard."

[BRANDED]

One of the early `brand narratives was to what extent actually having Covid would protect you in the future. This was a completely reasonable question but one that seemed incredible to those who didn't seek any further info than that of the nudge units.

[Lee Trundle]

*your company managed to rake in $1000 a second from it all

[Lee Trundle]

"Shame you never found one that worked, bell. Still, your managed to company raked in $1000 a second from it all."

[bell]

"Branded. I work for a big pharma company, when we were looking at vaccines for covid, we all said we would work for free and not feed our families or pay our bills etc."

[joyo]

Talkingshite lcke 11.24...you clearly suffer big time from paranoia and conspiracy theory disorder(mental health issue) Kaiser Slob you ain't much better

[BRANDED]

"""Russell Brand, on the popular Bill Maher Show, and to Russell Brand’s own YouTube audience of 6.5 million subscribers, said the following: “The pandemic created at least 40 new far big Pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made a thousand dollars of profit every second from the covid-19 vaccine. More than two-thirds of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election. Pfizer chairman Albert Bourla told Time magazine in July 2020 that his company was developing a Covid vaccine for the good of humanity not for money, and of course Pfizer made a hundred billion dollars in profit in 2022. If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies; where military industrial complex benefits from war; where energy companies benefit from energy crises; you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis.” And Russell Brand has not been too complimentary about Bill Gates, either. Bill Gates the philanthropist and very keen advocate of vaccines, is someone who has financial stakes in vaccine companies, and is also known to make donations to media, including the Telegraph. Vaccines and the media appear to be close to Bill’s philanthropic heart. Alphabet, the parent company of YouTube, also has stakes in vaccine companies. Alphabet is now denying Brand the ability to earn from his YouTube channel. So, at a time when Brand has grown up, put his wild ways behind him, is a family man and is speaking truth to power, the corporate controlled media launch a campaign against him. They loved him when he was degenerate, but not now when he’s a sober, drug-free, family man reading out interesting statistics on the tele. But, it’s all just a coincidence."""

[zebthecat]

"Kaiser Zoso 11:30 Wed Sep 20 Most of that is wrong, perfectly healthy people did die of it. Nothing I say will ever convince you of that as that would disturb your happy bubble."

[BRANDED]

"Telegraph Whatever your views on the Russell Brand scandal - and there are four serious allegations of rape, assault and ‚Äúemotional abuse‚Äù against him, the decision by YouTube to suspend the comedian and actor‚Äôs ability to earn money from a platform where he has 6.5 million subscribers is just appalling. Chilling, actually. As is the behaviour of the BBC, which says it has removed some content featuring their former favourite bad boy from iPlayer, ‚Äúhaving assessed that it now falls below public expectations‚Äù. Oh, please, spare us the primly shuddering disclaimer! As Brand himself told ITV presenter Lorraine Kelly, when she suggested that some of his sleazy exploits may have been enabled by his employers, ‚ÄúYes, I suppose if you‚Äôre in a position of some success, people will let you be a nutter as long as they‚Äôre making money out of it.‚Äù The nutter and self-confessed sex addict whom the BBC and Channel 4 treated like a pet tarantula for years, the latter making millions on the back of Russell‚Äôs brand of Mephistophelian mayhem, is dropped with cowardly alacrity once there is a media storm. Not only does this Orwellian unpersonning of Russell Brand violate a fundamental tenet of a free society ‚Äì these are still only allegations, remember ‚Äì it makes the prospect of a fair trial, should he ever be charged, unlikely. The story has already taken a depressingly tribal turn. The Left, seemingly delighted to have an ‚Äúalt-Right‚Äù scalp, draws absurd comparisons with Jimmy Savile. (Whatever Brand‚Äôs misdemeanours, he is hardly in the same league as Britain‚Äôs most prolific child sexual abuser, a fiend who violated hospital patients in their beds. Nor is he ‚Äúour Harvey Weinstein‚Äù. I observed the terror that the movie mogul inspired close up; Harvey used his immense power to stymie the careers of women who wouldn‚Äôt have sex with him. No one is claiming Brand did that.) Meanwhile, people like me on the Right wonder a little about the timing. Why was this ‚Äúopen secret‚Äù ignored for so many years? Brand‚Äôs remorseless priapic opportunism, his reputation as a Lothario was public knowledge, certainly within his industry although, as one TV veteran told me yesterday, ‚ÄúWe knew Russell was an operator with a big mouth but we never heard any rumours he was a rapist‚Ķ Nothing like the stories that went around about Savile.‚Äù Admittedly, it is a long and painstaking process for reporters to build the evidence needed for this kind of expos?©. (I have been trying, and failing, to acquire similar material on another creepy BBC star. People are afraid to go on the record.) But if Brand were still a Socialist pin-up invited to guest-edit the New Statesman, instead of a ‚Äúfar-Right‚Äù turncoat spouting ‚Äúconspiracy theories‚Äù about Covid, Big Pharma and the military industrial complex to a vast audience on social media, would there have been rather less enthusiasm to bring him to book?"

[BRANDED]

"Telegraph Whatever your views on the Russell Brand scandal - and there are four serious allegations of rape, assault and ‚Äúemotional abuse‚Äù against him, the decision by YouTube to suspend the comedian and actor‚Äôs ability to earn money from a platform where he has 6.5 million subscribers is just appalling. Chilling, actually. As is the behaviour of the BBC, which says it has removed some content featuring their former favourite bad boy from iPlayer, ‚Äúhaving assessed that it now falls below public expectations‚Äù. Oh, please, spare us the primly shuddering disclaimer! As Brand himself told ITV presenter Lorraine Kelly, when she suggested that some of his sleazy exploits may have been enabled by his employers, ‚ÄúYes, I suppose if you‚Äôre in a position of some success, people will let you be a nutter as long as they‚Äôre making money out of it.‚Äù The nutter and self-confessed sex addict whom the BBC and Channel 4 treated like a pet tarantula for years, the latter making millions on the back of Russell‚Äôs brand of Mephistophelian mayhem, is dropped with cowardly alacrity once there is a media storm. Not only does this Orwellian unpersonning of Russell Brand violate a fundamental tenet of a free society ‚Äì these are still only allegations, remember ‚Äì it makes the prospect of a fair trial, should he ever be charged, unlikely. The story has already taken a depressingly tribal turn. The Left, seemingly delighted to have an ‚Äúalt-Right‚Äù scalp, draws absurd comparisons with Jimmy Savile. (Whatever Brand‚Äôs misdemeanours, he is hardly in the same league as Britain‚Äôs most prolific child sexual abuser, a fiend who violated hospital patients in their beds. Nor is he ‚Äúour Harvey Weinstein‚Äù. I observed the terror that the movie mogul inspired close up; Harvey used his immense power to stymie the careers of women who wouldn‚Äôt have sex with him. No one is claiming Brand did that.) Meanwhile, people like me on the Right wonder a little about the timing. Why was this ‚Äúopen secret‚Äù ignored for so many years? Brand‚Äôs remorseless priapic opportunism, his reputation as a Lothario was public knowledge, certainly within his industry although, as one TV veteran told me yesterday, ‚ÄúWe knew Russell was an operator with a big mouth but we never heard any rumours he was a rapist‚Ķ Nothing like the stories that went around about Savile.‚Äù Admittedly, it is a long and painstaking process for reporters to build the evidence needed for this kind of expos?©. (I have been trying, and failing, to acquire similar material on another creepy BBC star. People are afraid to go on the record.) But if Brand were still a Socialist pin-up invited to guest-edit the New Statesman, instead of a ‚Äúfar-Right‚Äù turncoat spouting ‚Äúconspiracy theories‚Äù about Covid, Big Pharma and the military industrial complex to a vast audience on social media, would there have been rather less enthusiasm to bring him to book?"