West Ham Online

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 12:37 So just to be clear, you're much happier with China being the dominate world power?

 

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 12:37

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 12:30 ON a rating out of 10, how worried are you about what the Americans call the Gulf of Mexico?

 

That was sort of my point, such a petty meaningless thing to do, for nothing else either than stroke his ego and get the sort of moron that actually cares about it on side.

 

I have been down the Suez canal one way and both ways down the Panama canal, have also done the Kiel and Corinth canals.

I'm the fucking canal man.

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 12:30 ON a rating out of 10, how worried are you about what the Americans call the Gulf of Mexico?

 

So just to be clear, you're much happier with China being the dominate world power?

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 12:21 Trump standing up to China, in terms of the Panama Canal, is a good thing.

Unless you agree on what the Chinese are doing globally is better for the world (it isn't).

 

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 12:23 This is the man that's crass enough to blame the Washington air crash on Biden and diversity hire even before the black boxes had been fished out the river. I'm sure you lot lapped it up though

ON a rating out of 10, how worried are you about what the Americans call the Gulf of Mexico?

This is the man that's crass enough to blame the Washington air crash on Biden and diversity hire even before the black boxes had been fished out the river. I'm sure you lot lapped it up though

Trump standing up to China, in terms of the Panama Canal, is a good thing.

Unless you agree on what the Chinese are doing globally is better for the world (it isn't).

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 09:45

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 15:46 Well I think that would affect pretty much everyone in the long run, besides that it would be a quiet forum if you only should comment on things that personally affect you

As I asked before, what specifically worries you about it in the long run? Not some blokes article, I'm asking you why you're so worried?

And aside from Greenland, what other things are you so worried about? I'm genuinely interested.

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025, 16:22 Another paedo gang been jailed. They seemed to have slipped through the radar for 13 years. For some reason Elon Musk, Nigel Farage, Laurence Fox and their supporters are being very quiet about this one. (Can forgive Tommy Robinson, this time, seeing he's banged up for bullying a child. I'm sure had he been free, he would have shown up at the court trying to disrupt the trial by videoing people.)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2dxj570n21o

What a shock, the BBC going all negative on Brexit. Still, the usual suspects piss is still being sufficiently boiled so clouds n silver linings.

ag ag ag

Swiss. wrote: ↑31 Jan 2025, 10:37 Everyone should read this:

Five key impacts of Brexit five years on

Everything I predicted has come true. Those who voted to leave really are the gullible and the stupid.

Everyone should read this:

Five key impacts of Brexit five years on

Everything I predicted has come true. Those who voted to leave really are the gullible and the stupid.

Think the yanks are looking at Greenland strategically seeing as it's closer to America than it is to Denmark. Better off in their hands rather than the Chinese or Russians.

Looks like Guantanamo is going to be getting busy again.

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 15:46 Well I think that would affect pretty much everyone in the long run, besides that it would be a quiet forum if you only should comment on things that personally affect you

So there will undoubtedly be others within the South Yorkshire police force, who were also aware of this latest revelation, I'd guess even when it was going on, who would rather see the two perpetrators leave quietly and that would be that?

As well as a period of many years, where some of  those amongst them who did want to do the right and proper thing, quit or were forced out of the police service, for daring to want to do more about the systematic raping of vulnerable minors?

​​​​​​But it was all because they were underfunded and stretched?

Council tax bills will be out soon. Be lovely to wake up in Rotherham, (I know, I'm stretching it a bit here), to find out it's another 5% increase and then when you see the broken down bit, most of that is for increased police costs.

Still, if you're angry about any of this you're a gammon racist.

Well I think that would affect pretty much everyone in the long run, besides that it would be a quiet forum if you only should comment on things that personally affect you

Ok, hopefully it doesn't affect you too much.

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 10:59

And Trump, it was all quite funny the first time round, this time he's dangerous, he doesnt seem to care about how he appears now there's no reelection holding him back, and there's no one left to tell him "no" when he was an incredibly bad idea.

His conversation this week with the Danish Prime Minister hes made it crystal clear he's actually serious about all this shit, are there any Trump supporters among you they don't openly support this shit? there must be one or two of you surely??

What is it that he's serious about that is making you so worried?

collyrob wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 20:32 absolutely horrendous 

And Trump, it was all quite funny the first time round, this time he's dangerous, he doesnt seem to care about how he appears now there's no reelection holding him back, and there's no one left to tell him "no" when he was an incredibly bad idea.

His conversation this week with the Danish Prime Minister hes made it crystal clear he's actually serious about all this shit, are there any Trump supporters among you they don't openly support this shit? there must be one or two of you surely??

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 09:08

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑30 Jan 2025, 08:42

Leonard Hatred" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 23:26 Were they... y'know...

 

Either that or deliberately compromised. The real question is why are they former officers? Was this already known and covered up?

One is in his sixties and has retired. I dunno about the other one.

I suspect their names will be interesting to the public, because if they are names of a Pakistani origin the public will understandably think, 'yet another cover up'.