Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Squad Building for 25/26

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post southbankbornnbred »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 16 Feb 2025, 10:14
Sir Alf" wrote: 16 Feb 2025, 09:44 Good summary Nutsin. Potter reverted to a back 4 and got central midfield wrong relying on the slowest double pivot central midfield in the Premiership. A back 3 seems a better fit but also when Paqueta dropped deeper we had 3 in the central mid and stopped Brentford having so much space to run into when they countered. As u say, Paqueta has to play deeper with the game ahead of him.

Not writing Potter off yet but he has to learn we cannot  play a 2 person central midfield of Alvarez and Soucek and that Mavro in a 4 man back 4 us going to be risky. Hopefully wont see either mistakes repeated?  Main other thing we need is Ferguson and Todibo to get and stay fit
Yeah, interesting summaries, Alf and Nutsin.

I also think it’s far too early to judge Potter. These are not his players and there’s just no way he’d have signed most of them. I’m not saying he’ll rip it up at West Ham (who knows), but his teams don’t generally look like us right now.

This old, slow and tired squad has a LOT of problems. But by far the biggest problem I can see is in central defence.

Nutsin summed it up nicely: “Mavrapanos still getting in the side as a starter makes you wonder just how good he must show at practice all week because on match day he is always one of the worse players on the field.”

Its not that Mavrapanos is any good - he’s fucking terrible. A mistake waiting to happen. It’s just that we don’t have any depth, and the other centre halves are also woeful - or injury prone.

We’ve spent (or agreed to spend) a small  fortune on some absolute dross. Kilman is the worst £40m footballer I’ve ever seen. He has the turning circle of an oil tanker and regularly gets destroyed for pace over ten yards - let alone 20+. It means we can’t really play, or get, high up the pitch quickly enough. So he forces us to play a way that Potter probably doesn’t want. Absolute waste of that huge outlay. Slow, off the pace mentally, and too easily exposed because of it. His saving grace is that he doesn’t really make “mistakes” like Mavrapanos - and he is a battler. It’s just that his physical attributes are poor for the modern Premier League, where opponents are often athletes more than footballers.

Mavrapanos was in excess of £20m. We've agreed to spend £34m on Todibo, who is a good player but injury prone - and clearly nursing his way through the season. And we spent £30m on Aguerd who started well, deteriorated under Moyes and then got loaned out by a hopeless manager who had no idea what he was doing.

Thats £125m worth of “talent” and we’re catastrophically poor at the back.

Fixing that will take some doing. Who, for example, will want to sign Kilman at his fee/wages - unless it’s a move like a return to Wolves for half the money?

Moyes and Lopetegui royally lumped us in it.
I also have to say that Sullivan - and the departed (and largely over-rated) Steidten should hang his head in shame over the Kilman deal. How a chairman and technical director could let a new manager sign somebody so obviously limited for £40m and then put him on astronomical wages and a seven-year contract, is beyond me.

Club chairman rightly and wrongly get blamed for a lot of things - some within their control, some not. But that Kilman deal was akin to falling asleep at the wheel.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Manuel »

stubbo wrote: 25 Feb 2025, 06:42
Manuel wrote: 25 Feb 2025, 00:50 This thread feels like the summer transfer thread (which is already long enough) three months early, we are going to discuss potential players coming in for SIX months? Anyway, I don't see Ferguson staying, no chance with David, so the forward search will be key once again. I think we do have a chance with Gomes. Walker Peters is a good player and agree Webster would be a good stopper to have in the ranks, but let's see where we are in SIX months, lol.
It probably is a bit like that...along with a player wishlist. But then we are being linked etc, so it's there to be discussed...if there's nothing to discuss, it will just die away.

But squad composition is always something under discussion...so why not?!
Agreed in general, no harm done, but the summer transfer thread is always exhausting enough, but now we have basically started it in Feb!
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 615
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 176 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post stubbo »

Manuel wrote: 25 Feb 2025, 00:50 This thread feels like the summer transfer thread (which is already long enough) three months early, we are going to discuss potential players coming in for SIX months? Anyway, I don't see Ferguson staying, no chance with David, so the forward search will be key once again. I think we do have a chance with Gomes. Walker Peters is a good player and agree Webster would be a good stopper to have in the ranks, but let's see where we are in SIX months, lol.
It probably is a bit like that...along with a player wishlist. But then we are being linked etc, so it's there to be discussed...if there's nothing to discuss, it will just die away.

But squad composition is always something under discussion...so why not?!
onsideman
Posts: 1139
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post onsideman »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 24 Feb 2025, 18:15 ...so AWB can play as a RCB, his best position, and cover wing back in emergencies...

 
 
 
What evidence do you have that RCB is his best position, or is that just your opinion based on a hunch? Intrigued to know
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Manuel »

This thread feels like the summer transfer thread (which is already long enough) three months early, we are going to discuss potential players coming in for SIX months? Anyway, I don't see Ferguson staying, no chance with David, so the forward search will be key once again. I think we do have a chance with Gomes. Walker Peters is a good player and agree Webster would be a good stopper to have in the ranks, but let's see where we are in SIX months, lol.
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 615
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 176 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post stubbo »

Supposedly Harwood-Bellis just signed up with Salthouse...mark him down tongomto either the Nigels or us in that case.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1850
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post twoleftfeet »

Get Cooper in from Sheffield United, superb keeper. 
Eerie Decent
Posts: 420
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 167 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Eerie Decent »

Tariq Lamptey (Brighton) RB/RWB - injury prone
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace) LB/LWB - why spend big money when Scarles will eventually be better?
Angel Gomes (Lille) CM - no chance
Jonathan David (Lille) STK - no chance


Given we'll have to be careful with funds this summer, Walker-Peters on a free would be astute business, can cover both flanks as a wing back, leaving us with him, Scarles and Summerville, so AWB can play as a RCB, his best position, and cover wing back in emergencies. Maybe sign another cheap left sided player, but we need to make Scarles first choice.

Harwood-Bellis no thanks. If Todibo stays, a sensible signing would be Adam Webster, very experienced and wouldn't cost a lot.

That would give us more money for a keeper, a quick powerful centre mid, and a striker. Hopefully they will be names that McAuley has got up his sleeve, rather than the usual links.
 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2035
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post fraser »

eusebiovic wrote: 24 Feb 2025, 17:55 I am guessing that there will be a few ins and outs but potentially the free transfer market might well unearth a few gems.

Tariq Lamptey (Brighton) RB/RWB
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace) LB/LWB
Angel Gomes (Lille) CM
Jonathan David (Lille) STK

All young lads with extensive experience and still the right side of 25 years old.

I hear we are also thinking of Taylor Harwood Bellis from Southampton to replace Mavropantsos too.

Potential outs?

Coufal
Mavropantsos 
Guido
Ings
Fullkrug
Emerson 
Antonio
Fabianski

My tuppence worth.
​​
Lamptey is injury prone but very good according to my Brighton mate. 

I think the other three will have better offers than us, but definitely the type we should be looking for. 
eusebiovic
Posts: 181
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 282 times
Been liked: 63 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post eusebiovic »

I am guessing that there will be a few ins and outs but potentially the free transfer market might well unearth a few gems.

Tariq Lamptey (Brighton) RB/RWB
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace) LB/LWB
Angel Gomes (Lille) CM
Jonathan David (Lille) STK

All young lads with extensive experience and still the right side of 25 years old.

I hear we are also thinking of Taylor Harwood Bellis from Southampton to replace Mavropantsos too.

Potential outs?

Coufal
Mavropantsos 
Guido
Ings
Fullkrug
Emerson 
Antonio
Fabianski

My tuppence worth.
​​
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Sir Alf »

One thing ( opinion ) to be mindful of after yesterday's enjoyable win is that our squad is much more suited to playing away against possession teams like Arsenal who will take the game to you.  If you get it right, as we did, positionally and are disciplined, know when to press etc. it can be very effective.  Football has changed or is in the process of changing again after an era of "tika taka" of Pep.   I just read the lead article on the BBC referring to Man City's demise this season.  The key paragraph for me is pasted below.  I think ( hope ) Potter is a student of the game and adaptable because he and Macaulay must look at Forest, Brighton, Bournemouth etc.  and realise that even Potter's tactical model, which arguably mirrored Guardiola, is not going to be as successful.  My opinion is, if possible, is to have several ways of playing analogous to a "south paw" boxer, depending on who you are playing, how the game is going. I remember ( just ) when I played back in the Cholmondly Warner days 😏 nothing worse than playing against teams where players switched position or role. Fortunately at that level it rarely happened.    We have to recruit for the future which means speed in centre mid for transitions. Its the key I think?

Anyway the article: 
"Citing Bournemouth and Brighton, he (Guardiola) said: "Today, modern football is not positional. You have to ride the rhythm."As the forefather of 'juego de posicion', the 'positional play' that has dominated world football since his Barcelona side won everything 15 years ago, this is a sizeable admission.It poses a question bigger than this one article: is this the beginning of the end for the 'Pepification' of modern football?Attacking quickly after a transition - when possession changes hands - is arguably overtaking Guardiola's philosophy at elite level, with emphasis increasingly placed on direct football that runs deliberately in contrast to possession and territory.While Liverpool have been successful this season with less chaos and more control than they had under Jurgen Klopp, and Tottenham's rapid, linear football has come unstuck with a thin squad, the data is there.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post southbankbornnbred »

Manuel wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:00
southbankbornnbred wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 07:47 Stubbo - all of that data just indicates that Kilman, and the rest of the defence, have been under intense pressure all season. Like when Aaron Ramsdale led the league for shots stopped - while he was at Sheffield United.

The data often doesn’t tell the real story, because it lacks context.

Kilman is a poor defender for his price. We massively overpaid for him. He’s the worst player I’ve ever seen in the £40m bracket. Being a standout in the Wolves defence isn’t a huge claim: I’m not sure Wolves ever finished in the top half of the table (somebody might correct me on that).

We’re the 7th biggest club in the Premier League - so, surely, we should be aiming for top-half football. But he’s never been at that level.

There isn’t a top-level scout who’d have him in the £40m bracket. Yet that’s what we foolishly overpaid.
You're a proper old bore ain't ya mate. All that just to say that Kilman ain't worth 40 mil, and I really don't think anyone gives a monkies, let alone bother to research it, if Wolves finished in the top half while he was there ffs. You big fucking Z.
Love you, too, Manny!
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3089
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Lee Trundle »

Manuel wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:43
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:35
Manuel wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:18
Not sure of your point? I agree he's crap, just saying there is no need to go all round the houses to say so!
if you think the point is that he's a but crap, then I think you're missing the whole point.

It's his obscene contract that's the issue here.  And we're still dishing them out.
Once again, my only point was that it doesn't take such a long post to say how crap he is and yes that the contract was too long if you want to chuck that it. Who the fuck was talking to you anyway, Southbank can answer for himself.

Now off you go and have the last word like most babies insist on on here.
I tell you what is boring, Manuel, you attempting to police the site with what YOU want to see.

He's a bit of advice.  No one on here give a flying fuck about your feelings.  If it's boing for you, just move along.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 166
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 89 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Clearly we overpaid for Kilman, but you could see the argument Lopetegui might have given for paying what we did. The club established a precedent the year before when spending £30m on Aguerd, a ball playing left footed CB, who simply wasn't cut out for the PL. If they want to replace him with someone who can perform the same role but one who is English, has a lot of Premier League experience and is his side's club captain, then all that and buying him from a PL club will easily cost an extra £10m more than Aguerd did.

Can't see what kind of argument could be had for giving him a 7 year contract though.
 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Manuel »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:35
Manuel wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:18
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:14 I'll remind you of that when you moan about having Kilman on our books a few years into the future, Manuel.
Not sure of your point? I agree he's crap, just saying there is no need to go all round the houses to say so!
if you think the point is that he's a but crap, then I think you're missing the whole point.

It's his obscene contract that's the issue here.  And we're still dishing them out.
Once again, my only point was that it doesn't take such a long post to say how crap he is and yes that the contract was too long if you want to chuck that it. Who the fuck was talking to you anyway, Southbank can answer for himself.

Now off you go and have the last word like most babies insist on on here.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3089
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Lee Trundle »

Manuel wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:18
Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:14 I'll remind you of that when you moan about having Kilman on our books a few years into the future, Manuel.
Not sure of your point? I agree he's crap, just saying there is no need to go all round the houses to say so!
if you think the point is that he's a but crap, then I think you're missing the whole point.

It's his obscene contract that's the issue here.  And we're still dishing them out.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Manuel »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 10:14 I'll remind you of that when you moan about having Kilman on our books a few years into the future, Manuel.
Not sure of your point? I agree he's crap, just saying there is no need to go all round the houses to say so!
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3089
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Lee Trundle »

I'll remind you of that when you moan about having Kilman on our books a few years into the future, Manuel.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Manuel »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 07:47 Stubbo - all of that data just indicates that Kilman, and the rest of the defence, have been under intense pressure all season. Like when Aaron Ramsdale led the league for shots stopped - while he was at Sheffield United.

The data often doesn’t tell the real story, because it lacks context.

Kilman is a poor defender for his price. We massively overpaid for him. He’s the worst player I’ve ever seen in the £40m bracket. Being a standout in the Wolves defence isn’t a huge claim: I’m not sure Wolves ever finished in the top half of the table (somebody might correct me on that).

We’re the 7th biggest club in the Premier League - so, surely, we should be aiming for top-half football. But he’s never been at that level.

There isn’t a top-level scout who’d have him in the £40m bracket. Yet that’s what we foolishly overpaid.
You're a proper old bore ain't ya mate. All that just to say that Kilman ain't worth 40 mil, and I really don't think anyone gives a monkies, let alone bother to research it, if Wolves finished in the top half while he was there ffs. You big fucking Z.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2306
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post El Scorchio »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 20 Feb 2025, 07:49 I don’t blame Kilman, btw. In his situation, I’d have signed for £40m, massive wages and a seven-year deal.

Of course.

The fault lies with the morons who made the move happen at that ridiculous price.
100%. I bet he and wolves thought Christmas had come early. Them for the fee and him for the absurd contract lengths and wages. As you say, can’t blame him. He’d have been an idiot NOT to take it. 

I just like you cannot fathom what led Lop and Sullivan to the conclusion he was the cannot miss must have piece for this team and was worth committing all that money to. Especially given the amount of deals Sullivan torpedoes which he doesn’t seem to think are worth it. He had his pants not only pulled down, but right off and chucked on a bonfire with this one. SEVEN YEARS we will be stuck with him for now on 100k a week. Likewise AWB, although at least he should be an asset rather than a liability for the first 3-4 of those. 

Well done Sullivan. But you just keep on telling everyone LG was the bad deal this summer. Sure. By the way that’s all gone quiet since TS was shown the door. Funny that. 
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2306
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post El Scorchio »

Nutsin wrote: 19 Feb 2025, 16:58 Won’t be surprised why is that?
Because he’s been doing it for years when we’ve desperately needed players. It’s hardly something new. 
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post southbankbornnbred »

I don’t blame Kilman, btw. In his situation, I’d have signed for £40m, massive wages and a seven-year deal.

Of course.

The fault lies with the morons who made the move happen at that ridiculous price.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post southbankbornnbred »

Stubbo - all of that data just indicates that Kilman, and the rest of the defence, have been under intense pressure all season. Like when Aaron Ramsdale led the league for shots stopped - while he was at Sheffield United.

The data often doesn’t tell the real story, because it lacks context.

Kilman is a poor defender for his price. We massively overpaid for him. He’s the worst player I’ve ever seen in the £40m bracket. Being a standout in the Wolves defence isn’t a huge claim: I’m not sure Wolves ever finished in the top half of the table (somebody might correct me on that).

We’re the 7th biggest club in the Premier League - so, surely, we should be aiming for top-half football. But he’s never been at that level.

There isn’t a top-level scout who’d have him in the £40m bracket. Yet that’s what we foolishly overpaid.
Nutsin
Posts: 2241
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Nutsin »

Won’t be surprised why is that?
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2306
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post El Scorchio »

Nutsin wrote: 19 Feb 2025, 15:05 It will be interesting to see the reaction on here in the summer when we fail to secure any players because Sullivan is submitting what many claim to be a low ball offer.
Or we refuse to meet the players agents demands.
or the players demands. Especially if he’s a quality player we are able to get on a Bosman.


 
Don't think anyone will be surprised. It's just par for the course.
However, hopefully we might be going after different sorts of targets. Maybe a few lesser known less expensive players. Only downside will be I am sure Sullivan won't have heard of them and just won't want to offer on them because they are too much of a gamble, even at a substantially cheaper price than his safety blanket 'tried and tested' sort of players like Ings, AWB, Kilman, JWP or his 'razzle dazzle' ones like Scamacca or Haller.
Nutsin
Posts: 2241
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: Squad Building for 25/26

Post Nutsin »

It will be interesting to see the reaction on here in the summer when we fail to secure any players because Sullivan is submitting what many claim to be a low ball offer.
Or we refuse to meet the players agents demands.
or the players demands. Especially if he’s a quality player we are able to get on a Bosman.

 
Post Reply