West Ham Online

Posted: **09 Dec 2024, 09:19**

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Posted: **04 Jan 2025, 11:26**

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025, 11:15 How can indicating that the Cologne sex attacks were clearly an organised act of provocation with all the features of bring a KGB special op be “enabling nonces”?

Of course it isn’t but suggesting it is is definitely supportive of the special operation.

Yes firend, neva forget the SpEshiaL oPeRashioNs

Posted: **04 Jan 2025, 11:19**

I’m not surprised you don’t get it.

Posted: **04 Jan 2025, 11:15**

How can indicating that the Cologne sex attacks were clearly an organised act of provocation with all the features of bring a KGB special op be “enabling nonces”?

Of course it isn’t but suggesting it is is definitely supportive of the special operation.

Posted: **04 Jan 2025, 10:54**

juss becose he call sub Saharans n***ers does not mean he is a raysist.
Or say Nye cologne sex attaks by Islamiks was really by Putin does not meen he is nonce enabler.

Or freton to kill whoers - that was Jesuits fawlt.

Or say he close down who with the dossyyay - JRM make him do that.

GOOD TIMES

Posted: **04 Jan 2025, 09:57**

Brilliant.

So Pickle the weasel plays down grooming & rape of children, gets called out for it and then runs crying to the mods.

Posted: **04 Jan 2025, 09:50**

The abusive posts have been deleted. Please stick to topic and don't make unfounded allegations against members...if you can back up a claim then do so by quoting the post that demonstrates it.

This thread is being given significantly more leeway for sensitive discussion than others, so you engage at your own risk of being offended by response, but baseless abuse and allegations will still result in sanctions for those doing so.

Final warning for all.

Posted: **03 Jan 2025, 18:51**

Indeed. Now, back to the point in question.

Posted: **03 Jan 2025, 15:21**

, wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025, 15:11 One wonders why Kemi, so recently in government, did not take the action that she is calling for now?

Why? Maybe because she was in the party in government at the time with a policy to benefit from the OUTRAGE as much as possible.

Posted: **03 Jan 2025, 15:11**

One wonders why Kemi, so recently in government, did not take the action that she is calling for now?

Posted: **03 Jan 2025, 14:41**

I see there is actually quite a lot of cross-party consensus on Musk trying to stoke another moral panic about the grooming gangs.

Would anyone like provide a little more detail and clarity on what lies he has actually been telling before I have to find out myself?

Posted: **03 Jan 2025, 14:10**

Musk absolutely shredding Starmer and Labour. What a joy it is to watch and hear them squirm

Posted: **27 Dec 2024, 19:02**

nychammer wrote: ↑27 Dec 2024, 18:05
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑24 Dec 2024, 11:46 I have always said NATO members need to spend more to strengthen the transatlantic alliance and keep common cause as free democracies.

It pretty much goes without saying.

All members should pay their fair share. Americans “pay” more because they will be the ones who have the military infrastructure. I think to Trumps point, is it fair that the US pay two thirds of the defence budget? I think an equitable split is 50/50 North America vs Europe maybe, especially as threat of conflict is likelier to come from the east

It’s not just a question of how much but what kind of spending. A re-arming Poland currently relies far too heavily on US command and control systems and intelligence and will have to develop its own tech and structures together with Germany and the UK. France is already a land power with its own nuclear capabilities but is currently going through a severe public debt crises; its real involvement in a stronger European arm of NATO is far from automatic. However, I think the next German administration will be looking to re-arm to stimulate its flagging industrial base, with all the political consequences that entails.

Posted: **27 Dec 2024, 18:05**

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑24 Dec 2024, 11:46 I have always said NATO members need to spend more to strengthen the transatlantic alliance and keep common cause as free democracies.

It pretty much goes without saying.

All members should pay their fair share. Americans “pay” more because they will be the ones who have the military infrastructure. I think to Trumps point, is it fair that the US pay two thirds of the defence budget? I think an equitable split is 50/50 North America vs Europe maybe, especially as threat of conflict is likelier to come from the east

Posted: **27 Dec 2024, 17:51**

In the UK we have the best politicians money can buy.

Posted: **26 Dec 2024, 14:37**

Is Starmer such a thick twat as he appears to be on PMQ…pre programmed speeches and responses to criticisms of his policies…

Black hole …Indeed…is exactly what he is…and his mate Lammy…

Posted: **26 Dec 2024, 12:01**

Another political milestone surpassed...

https://www.reformparty.uk/counter

Conservatives are dead.

Posted: **24 Dec 2024, 11:46**

I have always said NATO members need to spend more to strengthen the transatlantic alliance and keep common cause as free democracies.

It pretty much goes without saying.

Posted: **24 Dec 2024, 11:27**

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑24 Dec 2024, 11:19 Of course Trump was right

I don't remember that being your response at the time he said NATO needed to spend more.

But nice of you to now admit that he was right.

Posted: **24 Dec 2024, 11:19**

Of course Trump was right and of course NATO members need to spend more in response to the Kremlin threat. Interesting though how none of the usual organs have mentioned WARMONGERING yet.

Posted: **24 Dec 2024, 11:08**

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑24 Dec 2024, 10:14 “Personally I think the countries closest to Russia should pay the most. Let’s see what happens”

At the moment, I don’t think Trump even knows who the PM of Slovakia is or has any idea what Fico was doing in Moscow the other day at all.

NATO members admitting Trump is right.

Posted: **24 Dec 2024, 10:14**

“Personally I think the countries closest to Russia should pay the most. Let’s see what happens”

At the moment, I don’t think Trump even knows who the PM of Slovakia is or has any idea what Fico was doing in Moscow the other day at all.

Posted: **24 Dec 2024, 03:04**

NATO leaders are expecting to have to pony up more than the measly 2% of GDP defense spending now that Trump is in office.

Trump has called for bigger military spending by NATO members. He doesn’t like NATO taking advantage of the U S taxpayer.

He’s not fucking around.

Personally I think the countries closest to Russia should pay the most. Let’s see what happens.

Posted: **23 Dec 2024, 21:13**

Trump wants to buy Greenland, Says it’s essential for National security. US has been trying to buy it for over 150 years apparently. Doubt the Danes will sell, we’ll find out if Trump can pull it off.

Trumps also talking about taking back control of the Panama Canal. He says China has too much influence on the Canal and that is gonna change.

We finally have a leader of the free world that is willing and able to do something.

Posted: **23 Dec 2024, 07:59**

U.K. economic growth revised down to zero for Q3 this year.
CBI says "the economy is headed for the worst of all worlds".

Economically speaking, this country is an absolute mess. A government that appears to want businesses to pay the bills & large chunk of the population doesn’t want to work.

Posted: **23 Dec 2024, 07:03**

The footage is shocking, people just stood there and watched her burn ffs.

No cսnt tried to help put out her flames. There’s footage of the cսnt that did it fanning the flames and people stood there watching. What the fuck is wrong with the people in New York?

I won’t post it, It’s one of the most wickedest things I’ve seen.

West Ham Online

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)