West Ham Online

Jailed for 18 month!

Good I say!

 

 "They don't lie every time they open their mouths"


Think the words Tim and Walz blow that bollox right out of the window.

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 18:33

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 18:23 People want the orange rapist to win the US election to make lefties mad? Deary me.

 

Kindly explain, in your own time and using language that even an American could understand, the benefits to Americans the opposition have over Trump.

[url]tel:https://www.youtube.com/live/J2IebTLjRhI?feature=shared[/url] nobody believes the msm lies anymore

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 18:23 People want the orange rapist to win the US election to make lefties mad? Deary me.

 

Hahaha, says the Charlton fan. I've been quiet on the football forums for a very simple reason,i haven't seen much due to spending time with my grandkids at weekends andcivwont comment on something i haven't seen. 

'Far right' 

How very predictable.

That’s quite a claim to prove, onlyonebraincell.

Right now though, all you’ve got is your floppy attempts at jumping on the far-right bandwagon on any political thread and making a total tit of yourself every time.

We’ve literally never seen anything approaching football analysis from you. Hardly surprising given you’re such an obvious Queen’s Park Ranger.

People want the orange rapist to win the US election to make lefties mad?

Who said that?

 

People want the orange rapist to win the US election to make lefties mad? Deary me.

Fourpence, I've forgotten more about football than you'll ever know.

As for politics,unlike you i dont give off the impression that i'm all knowing but then,also unlike you i'm not a raving narcissist. Have to admit tho, it's great fun watching you embarrass yourself over Brexit, Trump,Israel etc.

 

I’m not suggesting you have to do anything, only one braincell. All I’m asking is you do us a favour and grace us with your football knowledge.

You’re a political moron. Perhaps you’re a football genius?

If Obama's policies were what made Americans better off, why did they ditch his team and let Trump win?

I can't speak for American residents/voters because I'm not one, but common sense suggests that if you feel that something works for you, you don't suddenly stop doing it.

Or did the number of stupid American voters simply outnumber the number of sensible American voters when Trump got elected?

How can you tell which is which just by looking at them - their names, maybe?

Fourpence, I'll post where and when I want if it's all the same to you.

Speaking of football forums, please carry on posting on them, it's fucking hilarious watching you floundering about talking complete bollox.

Americans were better off during Trumps’s term because the effects of his trade war with the world had not yet kicked in and Obama’s policies were still in the stat picture.

Do us all a favour onlyonebraincell and post on the football for a change why don’t you?

During Trumps period in office, (2016/20) ,Americans were far better off financially, their Southern border was closed and the world was a safer place yet the TDS this time round is off the scale. 

I hope he wins a landslide to send the soppy lefty cunts into an absolute frenzy. Watching them lose what's left of their minds will be great entertainment. 

Trump is actually angling for the Muslim vote in swing states by presenting Biden to them as the pro-Israeli agent of Palestine’s suffering.

Leadership on the world stage indeed. 

Both Trump and Robinson are disruptors.

The world needs (more) disruptors to help humanity progress/evolve and rip off the comfort blankets of those who can't handle change.

You’re looking to Trump for “strong leadership on the world stage”?

Good grief, he’s basically going to be doing what fucking Elon Musk tells him to!

Can't guarantee anything with how volatile the world currently is now but his record in Office previously spoke volumes about his intentions of avoiding war as far as is feasibly possible. The world's changed a lot worse in his absence and it's crying out for strong leadership on the world stage again when it comes to foreign policy. Biden and Co have been a mitigating disaster by comparison on that score. 

Trump made peace between North and South Korea because the South Korean president said so when hosting Trump on a state visit designed to present him as a peace maker. You really buy that shit? 

What has Trump done as candidate for president to convince you he will make peace in the Middle East? He’s convinced me he’ll throw Ukraine under the bus and preventing from ever gaining NATO security. And he’s convinced me Israel will be allowed to embark on a policy of imperialism with respect to its neighbours. The wars yet to come as a result will mar the rest of our days.

What say you, Mr Kissinger?
 

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 15:36

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 15:07

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 14:42

Unfortunately for you, history will show there were zero wars under his previous administration, and history will show that the guys you throw your support behind are the warmongers they actually are.

 

Beat me to it. He didn't involve himself (or his Country) in any wars, even though the mainstream Media tried it's level best to paint him out to be a totally irresponsible war mongering shitcunt before he was in Office. And yet look at the world turn to absolute shit straight after hus absence be it in Ukraine or Israel/Palestine. Must have been just 1 massive uncanny coincidence...

The mindless buffoon even got Kim Jong Un to play nicely for a bit too which was unthinkable at the time. 

Got Kim Jong Un to play nicely? All that happened was Kim Jong Un mugged off Trump and used him for a bit of free credibility and did absolutely nothing to change his threat to the world.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 15:07

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 14:42

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 14:14 Do you really believe it was thanks to Trump that there were fewer wars around the world when he was US president? Do you have any awareness at all of what was happening in the world at that time? 

Unfortunately for you, history will show there were zero wars under his previous administration, and history will show that the guys you throw your support behind are the warmongers they actually are.

 

Beat me to it. He didn't involve himself (or his Country) in any wars, even though the mainstream Media tried it's level best to paint him out to be a totally irresponsible war mongering shitcunt before he was in Office. And yet look at the world turn to absolute shit straight after hus absence be it in Ukraine or Israel/Palestine. Must have been just 1 massive uncanny coincidence...

The mindless buffoon even got Kim Jong Un to play nicely for a bit too which was unthinkable at the time. 

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 14:42

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 14:14 Do you really believe it was thanks to Trump that there were fewer wars around the world when he was US president? Do you have any awareness at all of what was happening in the world at that time? 

Unfortunately for you, history will show there were zero wars under his previous administration, and history will show that the guys you throw your support behind are the warmongers they actually are.

 

I'd be quite happy if your guys get back in (I don't think they will, though).

One of my private pensions is heavily linked to arms sales and that goes great guns when the dems are in charge.

History won’t show there were 0 wars when Trump was president. However, it will show what happened to millions of ordinary people left without proper medical support in a world pandemic. The US numbers speak for themselves and I am truly baffled why the Democrats have not made more of what the US public can expect from another Trump administration.

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑31 Oct 2024, 14:14 Do you really believe it was thanks to Trump that there were fewer wars around the world when he was US president? Do you have any awareness at all of what was happening in the world at that time?