Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

New Orleans terrorist attack

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Locked
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

10 Dead so far many more injured.
Apparently the culprit crossed the U S  border through Eagle pass Texas a couple of days ago.

He then decided to drive his Truck into a crowd of people celebrating the New Year.

What a world we live in.
 
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 23:05
Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:49
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:36
What would you call it then? The legal term for some who did rape someone but got off but everyone knows they did it... but you cant say cos youd get sued.... hmmmm
Why do you think they get sued Einstein?
That is not the point... oh stop being obtuse Nutsack...  answer the question fucktard... dont deflect... what would you call it then?
Kangaroo court, all the cases in New York were obviously corrupt and out for Trump. Had nothing to do with justice. However Truamp gets the last laugh, gonna be epic!
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 23:25
Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 23:02 Popodopalous (spelling)
What the fuck are you babbling on about, dick splash?
You asked who Trump had sued for calling him a rapist. George Popodopolous news anchor at NBC I believe. Had to pony up millions. 
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 426
Has liked: 254 times
Been liked: 102 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post One Sunny Day »

Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 23:02 Popodopalous (spelling)
What the fuck are you babbling on about, dick splash?
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 940
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 296 times
Been liked: 82 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

only1billybonds wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 23:11 BJB.

Talking of answering questions, have a cracking at this one please (you may have missed it earlier)


Please give 3 reasons why you think Trump was the 'worst ever president'. By that I don't mean what you think of him as a person, I mean what did he do that leads you to your opinion of him.

Not digging you out,I'm genuinely interested.
Already answered try reading the posts...
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post only1billybonds »

BJB.

Talking of answering questions, have a cracking at this one please (you may have missed it earlier)


Please give 3 reasons why you think Trump was the 'worst ever president'. By that I don't mean what you think of him as a person, I mean what did he do that leads you to your opinion of him.

Not digging you out,I'm genuinely interested.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 940
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 296 times
Been liked: 82 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:49
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:36
Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:29
“It’s a legal technicality” what a fucking retard!
What would you call it then? The legal term for some who did rape someone but got off but everyone knows they did it... but you cant say cos youd get sued.... hmmmm
Why do you think they get sued Einstein?
That is not the point... oh stop being obtuse Nutsack...  answer the question fucktard... dont deflect... what would you call it then?
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 23:01
Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:49
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:36
What would you call it then? The legal term for some who did rape someone but got off but everyone knows they did it... but you cant say cos youd get sued.... hmmmm
Why do you think they get sued Einstein?
Name one person who has been successfully sued for calling Trump a rapist
Wait till Trump takes over and gets his people in place at the FBI and DOJ. Gonna be some real shit come out about the dirty Dems. If I was Liz Cheney and co I’d be shitting myself.
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

Popodopalous (spelling)
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 426
Has liked: 254 times
Been liked: 102 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post One Sunny Day »

Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:49
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:36
Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:29
“It’s a legal technicality” what a fucking retard!
What would you call it then? The legal term for some who did rape someone but got off but everyone knows they did it... but you cant say cos youd get sued.... hmmmm
Why do you think they get sued Einstein?
Name one person who has been successfully sued for calling Trump a rapist
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:36
Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:29
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:35
 
So why didnt you...? And we all know that legally you cant say it if he is not convicted just as we all know that doesnt mean he didnt do it... its a legal technicality!
“It’s a legal technicality” what a fucking retard!
What would you call it then? The legal term for some who did rape someone but got off but everyone knows they did it... but you cant say cos youd get sued.... hmmmm
Why do you think they get sued Einstein?
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Hammer and Pickle »

only1billybonds wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:44 Fourpence.

You should stick to pretending that you experienced terrorism in the UK.
Same as you pretend to support West Ham, pretend to be a keen follower of ashes cricket and pretend that you dont sympathise with child rapists and sex pests. That's about your level.
Oh and this is just as good
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 01 Jan 2025, 23:10
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 01 Jan 2025, 20:58
 
You slack-jawed wankers seizing on every terrorist act to create moral panics are actually participating in fucking up the world while doing absolutely nothing to stop the terrorists. I really dread to think what bills Trump will send to Congress on the back of this with your full approval.
So rather than simply condemn the attack, you try to normalize it and rant about how people angry at it are at fault, and bang on about your irrational fears of an unwarranted response from Trump. You’re a vile terrorist and rape apologist scumbag.

 
 
Thought I’d bump this as an example of the kind of thing we were brought up to humour growing up in the 1980s
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post only1billybonds »

Fourpence.

You should stick to pretending that you experienced terrorism in the UK.
Same as you pretend to support West Ham, pretend to be a keen follower of ashes cricket and pretend that you dont sympathise with child rapists and sex pests. That's about your level.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 940
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 296 times
Been liked: 82 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:37
One Sunny Day" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:26
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:22 So it turns out the Vegas bomber and Jabbar both served at Ft. Bragg in 2012, both lived in North Carolina, both rented the trucks off Turo, and attacked on the same day.  









 
Maybe the USA should worry more about hero vets than hombres crossing the border to build peoples swimming pools on the cheap?
 
Again, to prove my point, you've deflected about the topic to rant about Trumps border policies.

You think these two attacks make their border crisis irrelevant?
No it shows Trump in his true light of putting divisive politics before any kind of morals and not bothering with trivial things like facts before he opens his racist mouth...
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Hammer and Pickle »

only1billybonds wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:33 OSD.

Good point, Biden and Harris really did all they could to get those Hombre's into the USA.
Let's see what Trumps team can do to stem that flow.
Stem the flow of hombres building swimming pools to make America Great Again.

But of course, braincell.
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:26
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:22 So it turns out the Vegas bomber and Jabbar both served at Ft. Bragg in 2012, both lived in North Carolina, both rented the trucks off Turo, and attacked on the same day.  








 
Maybe the USA should worry more about hero vets than hombres crossing the border to build peoples swimming pools on the cheap?
 
 
Again, to prove my point, you've deflected about the topic to rant about Trumps border policies.

You think these two attacks make their border crisis irrelevant?
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 940
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 296 times
Been liked: 82 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

Nutsin wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:29
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:35
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:30
No, you CAN say he is not a rapist. You just can’t say he is, which is why an ABC news anchor lost a 15m law suit recently.
 
So why didnt you...? And we all know that legally you cant say it if he is not convicted just as we all know that doesnt mean he didnt do it... its a legal technicality!
“It’s a legal technicality” what a fucking retard!
What would you call it then? The legal term for some who did rape someone but got off but everyone knows they did it... but you cant say cos youd get sued.... hmmmm
Last edited by BillyJenningsBoots on 02 Jan 2025, 22:40, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Cabbige Savage" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:47
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:35 One thing we learned growing up in the IRA days in London was how important it was to be vigilant on public transport for unattended bags. Another was to relate to each other as normal. Everyone thought the Rev. Ian Paisley was a crank and understood that demanding reprisals against the Republican Irish was giving in to the terrorists. The Paddy down the pub was generally safe when he’d had a few too many and started going on about the Black and Tans …
I’ve good reason to believe things haven’t changed all that much only the terrorist happen to be of different religion these days and the efforts to polarise and incite get loads of social media hits.
 
Evry times Europe has islamik terror attak picjkle go straight to halal butcher and wash Akmeds feet to show he dos not blame him.
 
 
Why would I have to do that? He sells steaks and lamb and he doesn’t in the least nail-bomb squaddies and city types. You’re not exactly abolishing the thick, frustrated Paddy stereotype here, are you.
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post only1billybonds »

OSD.

Good point, Biden and Harris really did all they could to get those Hombre's into the USA.
Let's see what Trumps team can do to stem that flow.
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Nutsin »

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:35
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:30
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:17
I love it "Trump has never been found guilty of rape" so you cant say he is not a rapist just that he hasnt been found guilty... what an endorsement, and says it all!!!! 👏 🤣
No, you CAN say he is not a rapist. You just can’t say he is, which is why an ABC news anchor lost a 15m law suit recently.
 
So why didnt you...? And we all know that legally you cant say it if he is not convicted just as we all know that doesnt mean he didnt do it... its a legal technicality!
“It’s a legal technicality” what a fucking retard!
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 426
Has liked: 254 times
Been liked: 102 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post One Sunny Day »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:22 So it turns out the Vegas bomber and Jabbar both served at Ft. Bragg in 2012, both lived in North Carolina, both rented the trucks off Turo, and attacked on the same day.  






 
Maybe the USA should worry more about hero vets than hombres crossing the border to build peoples swimming pools on the cheap?
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

So it turns out the Vegas bomber and Jabbar both served at Ft. Bragg in 2012, both lived in North Carolina, both rented the trucks off Turo, and attacked on the same day.  





 
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post only1billybonds »

BJB

Please give 3 reasons why you think Trump was the 'worst ever president'. By that I don't mean what you think of him as a person, I mean what did he do that leads you to your opinion of him.

Not digging you out,I'm genuinely interested.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 940
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 296 times
Been liked: 82 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 22:02
One Sunny Day" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:46
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:35
 
So why didnt you...? And we all know that legally you cant say it if he is not convicted just as we all know that doesnt mean he didnt do it... its a legal technicality!
Oh, we can say he's a rapist. Trump already threw a hissy hit over that and a judge dismissed it. He's been found liable  for sexual assault and his supporters are just grasping and straws that he's not a sex case. Couldn't care less where he stands, politically, absolute wrong 'un anyone supporting the rapist. And no libel can be invoked.
You’ve gone from moaning about false claims in the OP to arguing for false claims when it suits your agenda, whilst still ignoring the actual topic. 
Nope we were just nailing home the point that someone wanted us to define the reasons for Trump being the worst President ever... I think thats pretty much covered that..

What was your point?
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: New Orleans terrorist attack

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:46
BillyJenningsBoots wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:35
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 02 Jan 2025, 21:30
No, you CAN say he is not a rapist. You just can’t say he is, which is why an ABC news anchor lost a 15m law suit recently.
 
So why didnt you...? And we all know that legally you cant say it if he is not convicted just as we all know that doesnt mean he didnt do it... its a legal technicality!
Oh, we can say he's a rapist. Trump already threw a hissy hit over that and a judge dismissed it. He's been found liable  for sexual assault and his supporters are just grasping and straws that he's not a sex case. Couldn't care less where he stands, politically, absolute wrong 'un anyone supporting the rapist. And no libel can be invoked.
You’ve gone from moaning about false claims in the OP to arguing for false claims when it suits your agenda, whilst still ignoring the actual topic. 
Locked