West Ham Online

Another dreadful VAR intervention to disallow Fulham goal at Chelsea 

Bournemouth have been great this half

Their scouting is off the chart. £30m clear profit on Kerkez then pick up Truffert for £11m plus add ons

Grealish is tearing it up for Everton 

Cullen scores at Old Trafford

Oops

Bournemouth should be out of sight, and spurs should have had about 5 bookings.
funny watching Kudus completely ignoring runners.

 

mallard wrote: ↑30 Aug 2025, 15:12 Same here Ox, along with Newcastle and Man Utd - draws at Sunderland and Wolves

Should be 2-0.
Semenyo is a fantastic player.

Same here Ox, along with Newcastle and Man Utd - draws at Sunderland and Wolves

goose wrote: ↑30 Aug 2025, 15:06 Spurs 0-1
thoughts & prayers with mad ferret

Spurs 0-1
thoughts & prayers with mad ferret

What chances the Fulham goal gets disallowed if it was Chelsea that scored it?

As for the penalty, no complaints IF a Chelsea player hadn’t handled it in the same way in the build up. But he did. So another home decision. 

As for this announcing the decision, they think it’s going to appease the fans. It’s riling them up more. What an atrocious invention VAR is. 

Joao Pedro handled & Caicedo stepped on Iwobi’s foot (just like the disallowed Fulham goal)
Penalty to Chelsea 
ha ha ha ha 

Another non VAR pen. Pathetic 

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑30 Aug 2025, 13:29 8 mins seemed excessive despite the Delap injury & VAR review
Lets play 9 so Chelsea can score

 

8 mins seemed excessive despite the Delap injury & VAR review
Lets play 9 so Chelsea can score
 

Paqueta gets shoved.. Accidentally 

Fulham player doesn't hover and puts his foot down in only place possible, careless foul..

Third time in three games that VAR has disallowed goals v Chelsea.

Terrible decision
Accidentally stands on his foot , not a foul
Same old VAR , Chelsea get away with one against Fulham. Just like Man U last week when Yoro shoved the Fulham player under the ball
 

Yep the authorities are desperate for the top six to win