The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
by Come On You Irons
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:52
by THUNDERCLINT
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 12:55
His own mother (according to court findings) said his political views had changed over the past year or so, shifting toward the left and becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights.
That's probably not good enough for you, I'm guessing, Sven.
So left wing ideology can transform you from normal to a tranny knobbing murderer in under 12 months.
Explains a lot...
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:48
by Takashi Miike
the cսnt should have been tortured to death after this shit
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:45
by BRANDED
He can get another job, or speak any place else.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:38
by Massive Attack
, wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 15:20
In his Monday night monologue, Kimmel said: "The Maga Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from It.”
The above statement infuriated Republicans who seem to think that they can say what they like but anything said/written they disagree with leads to the media outlet responsible being attacked with pressure also put upon the company to ban the author/speaker.
This kid came from the heart of a solid Christian, Republican, community it’s undeniable yet telling people that fact is deemed as an abuse of free speech.
Sacked for telling blatant lies to an impressionable TV audience of which need little excuse to be even more pissed off than they already are on both sides of the political aisle. Spreading such misinformation is extremely dangerous in this current climate about such things and yet divvy Kimmel thought he was being clever to gob off like he normally does thinking he's untouchable on National TV.
With regards to free speech, he freely used it, no one stopped him saying it. And ABC exercised their right to indefinitely suspend him for breaching his contract by openly lying that's now broadcasted to the world what he said.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:33
by Nutsin
, wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 15:20
In his Monday night monologue, Kimmel said: "The Maga Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from It.”
The above statement infuriated Republicans who seem to think that they can say what they like but anything said/written they disagree with leads to the media outlet responsible being attacked with pressure also put upon the company to ban the author/speaker.
This kid came from the heart of a solid Christian, Republican, community it’s undeniable yet telling people that fact is deemed as an abuse of free speech.
I think anyone with half a brain understands why Disney indefinitely suspended him.
Not that difficult to figure out unless you’re a disengenuous, unhinged, leftist minge.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:31
by Lee Trundle
You live by the sword, you die by the sword, comma.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 15:20
by ,
In his Monday night monologue, Kimmel said: "The Maga Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from It.”
The above statement infuriated Republicans who seem to think that they can say what they like but anything said/written they disagree with leads to the media outlet responsible being attacked with pressure also put upon the company to ban the author/speaker.
This kid came from the heart of a solid Christian, Republican, community it’s undeniable yet telling people that fact is deemed as an abuse of free speech.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 14:50
by Jaan Kenbrovin
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 14:45
Why is being pro gay & trans evidence that he is leftist?
Did he also advocate for public ownership of the means of production
Are we saying that no right wing people are gay / pro gay?
I suspect he had a personal interest in transphobic vilification from Kirk because he was poking a trans individual
But that his other core values were Mormon gun nut along with other MAGA’s
Possibly even aligned with Nick Fuentes who I understand is even more right wing
I see Jimmy Kimmel has been thrown off air for suggesting MAGA’s are trying to paint Robinson as a lefty
Free speech innit?
Tyler Robinson’s family have stated he had become left wing.
Jimmy Kimmel has been suspended for refusing to apologise for lying about Tyler Robinson by claiming he was MAGA.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 14:48
by Lee Trundle
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 14:45
Why is being pro gay & trans evidence that he is leftist?
It isn't. The bit before does though.
If you can't be bothered to read things correctly, then I doubt I'll bother with the rest of what you typed out below.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 14:45
by Fauxstralian
Why is being pro gay & trans evidence that he is leftist?
Did he also advocate for public ownership of the means of production
Are we saying that no right wing people are gay / pro gay?
I suspect he had a personal interest in transphobic vilification from Kirk because he was poking a trans individual
But that his other core values were Mormon gun nut along with other MAGA’s
Possibly even aligned with Nick Fuentes who I understand is even more right wing
I see Jimmy Kimmel has been thrown off air for suggesting MAGA’s are trying to paint Robinson as a lefty
Free speech innit?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 13:58
by Massive Attack
"Oi Fauxstralian, stop mucking about with that gaslight and attach this Union Jack instead, there's a good chap!"
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 12:58
by BRANDED
Come on. We really dont know what led up to this or even if he's guilty.
We will try and bring our priors to the table though.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 12:55
by Lee Trundle
His own mother (according to court findings) said his political views had changed over the past year or so, shifting toward the left and becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights.
That's probably not good enough for you, I'm guessing, Sven.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 12:50
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Are there not any trans people in the Republican Party or followers of Nick Fuentes?
Probably not.
You're looking desperate and rather silly now and people in prominent positions in the ultra-liberal US mainstream media are now being sacked for insisting on the very nonsense you are proposing.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 12:49
by Mike Oxsaw
Awful lot of energy being poured into proving (PROVING) that the assassin was "not one of us".
Wonder why that is.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 12:42
by Lee Trundle
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 12:31
Is there evidence that the child of MAGA Mormon gun fanatics was left leaning beyond the ‘fact’ that because he was bumming a trans individual and supposedly shot Kirk because he didn’t like his transphobic views that he MUST be an unhinged leftist?
Are there not any trans people in the Republican Party or followers of Nick Fuentes?
Seems a strange conclusion to jump to in a world where the MAGA Vice President appears to wear mascara in public
Don't you think accepting he was part of your mob will help you move on, Sven?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 12:31
by Fauxstralian
Is there evidence that the child of MAGA Mormon gun fanatics was left leaning beyond the ‘fact’ that because he was bumming a trans individual and supposedly shot Kirk because he didn’t like his transphobic views that he MUST be an unhinged leftist?
Are there not any trans people in the Republican Party or followers of Nick Fuentes?
Seems a strange conclusion to jump to in a world where the MAGA Vice President appears to wear mascara in public
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 11:30
by Massive Attack
violator wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 08:47
Wonder what that fucking cսnt Khan thinks of it
Would be far too busy knocking one out to the news would be my guess.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 11:28
by Massive Attack
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 08:26
"Egyptian illegal migrant, 42, who raped woman in Hyde Park while living in the Hilton hotel is a convicted Islamic terrorist"
Just your average news headline to wake up to nowadays, isn't it?
"SAY IT LOUD, SAY IT CLEAR, RAPISTS ARE WELCOME HERE"
#Hugarapist
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 08:47
by violator
Wonder what that fucking cսnt Khan thinks of it
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 08:26
by Lee Trundle
"Egyptian illegal migrant, 42, who raped woman in Hyde Park while living in the Hilton hotel is a convicted Islamic terrorist"
Just your average news headline to wake up to nowadays, isn't it?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
wtf is gaslighting?... I believe we've progressed from the 1800's.
the constant bickering on here about whether he was a immigrant, muslim, Welsh, a terrorist etc. made me think what about the victims. The post was about remembering the victims in your mass-debating... think you'll find that it was the Establishment who failed to recognize the threat, despite earnest warnings from the Teacher. That failure resulted in an absolute tragedy would you not agree?
Sorry to electriclight you, hope you don't get too lit up.
I'll tell what gaslighting is, although it has been a well-known part of the English language since the 1950s, so you're either thick or being deliberately obtuse.
Gaslighting is, for instance, the implication that wanting to allocate the responsibility for a heinous crime at the door of the person and the circumstances that actually pertain to that crime is in some way distasteful and shows a lack of compassion for the victims of that crime. Which is precisely what you are doing.
I knew you'd get all lit-up when I 'electriclighted' you... you didn't have to go to all that trouble to explain the meaning of 'gaslighting', I googled it earlier, that obtuse enough for you?
love the way you surmise, your intelligence knows no boundaries outside of your arse.
So you were being deliberately obtuse. Thanks for confirming. I think we can all agree on that basis I was right with the rest of my post.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)