Page 27 of 144
Lopetegui (sacked 8.1.2025)
Posted: 18 Aug 2024, 01:31
by maverick180
I was thoroughly looking forward to the start of this season
Was also prepared that things might take some time and wasn't expecting miracles over night What I didn't expect was a manager who after spending 6 weeks with the total dross he'd been left by Moyes would deem them fit to start in a premier league game And low and behold all of them played absolute shit
We're now 1 game in and none of our new players are any closer to bedding in or learning anything from their new team mates cos they barely spent a second on the pitch, half of them not at all I think it's gonna take somewhere between 6-10 games before we see the team anyone with an ounce of sense would play cos this bloke can't identify shit when he see's it I thought we was handed a miracle at half time when we went in level and low and behold he changed nothing I'm sure people are gonna make excuses for him and say it's too early to judge
But from what I've just seen today, this cսnt is David Moyes in a mission impossible mask
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 14:15
by Snodders' Beard
Whilst I can see the argument that Flop needs to be backed with "his" players to play his style, I'd counter that he's done so poorly with what he's currently got that he hasn't earnt the spending outlay necessary for reinforcements.
Besides, aside from the "gift" of Danny Ings, the parasitic poisonous porno dwarf doesn't spend in January so freebies and loans it'll be. Maybe in the hope of getting Flop to walk.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 13:19
by Russ of the BML
nychammer wrote: ↑06 Jan 2025, 11:56
The problem is too many cooks in the kitchen transfer wise, managerial upheaval and players who have realized we are not the promised land and are playing for themselves and not the team and worse some who are going through the motions for a payday.
The club either need to believe in Loppy and back him to get HIS transfers in or sack him and get someone else.
Believe in Loppy?
This is a coach that cannot get a tune out of a team containing Bowen, Paqueta, Kudus, Summerville, Emerson, AWB and Fullkrug - And a whole host of other top international players.
I mean, fuck me, I realise that the players I listed are not renowned as being top PL players, but they aren't far off. What's the point of adding new players? It's like pouring more water into a bucket that's got a hole in the bottom. Lope being the hole. The bucket needs plugging.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 11:56
by nychammer
The problem is too many cooks in the kitchen transfer wise, managerial upheaval and players who have realized we are not the promised land and are playing for themselves and not the team and worse some who are going through the motions for a payday.
The club either need to believe in Loppy and back him to get HIS transfers in or sack him and get someone else.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 11:18
by Ron Eff
The priority has to be legs in midfield. A box to boxer. Rice wasn’t just a sitter. He put out fires but mostly because he was fit enough and quick enough to do so. Ironically, Alvarez would have been ideal with Rice, not to replace him. We’re overrun on the counter because we don’t have the legs to run back.
I don’t know who the answer is, but everyone else seems to find one. Baleba at Brighton for example. How difficult can it be for a team scouts to locate an athletic midfielder who can also pass a football?
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 11:07
by Manuel
We need a new keeper. We've needed a new LB for about 5 years. We have the worst CB's in the PL. The midfield is full of carthorses, need a minimum two new faces in there. We still need a CF. In short, it's fucked. When are the ST renewals?
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 10:53
by threesixty
Would even Lewandoski score goals with our setup? We seem to be upset with the pace of our strikers and we’ve got rid of 2 world class ones before, mainly because they had no pace. We will be doing the exact same thing again.
I saw a few touches from fullkrug plus a very good finish from him.
I do wonder if concentrating on the striker situation is a red herring. We really need to fix that midfield asap. I really don’t think we need this CDM thing.
we need a dynamic box to box midfielder and a another creative mid.
also, just realised the main advisor to Sullivan is the one that got him Lopetegui. So Lopetegui is going nowhere.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 07:37
by Russ of the BML
Unai Emery is the only bloke right now that loves Lope. Emery will play a weakened team in the cup game and still win comfortably. Massively helps Villa's season. Good ol' Lope. Least he is doing someone a favour.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 06:23
by Ron Eff
Tbf, Fullkrug did get in the right position to be able to put us 1-0 up if it wasn’t for Kudus wanting to score a goal purely for the benefit of any watching eyes only to completely fuck it up with his right foot, the greedy prick.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 22:28
by Massive Attack
I don't think either are cutting it yet but clearly Fullkrug is for you based on very little other than 2 meaningless consolation goals. I want to see more from both, yes even Lopetegui. His job isn't safe for a reason and he can't complain too much which is why he doesn't.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 22:16
by goose
I’d say one has shown glimpses of quality in a team which is playing shit, and despite being injured for the majority of games.
The other has had 20 games and is as bad in game 20 as he was in game 1.
The only individual not cutting it, is the god awful manager who is ultimately responsible for those awful performances.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 22:10
by Massive Attack
goose wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 21:50
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 21:31
442 minutes of game time and only 2 consolation goals scored once the opposition have long won the game and switched off doesn't cut it.
My fear now is West Ham thinking he's doing enough with his occasional consolation moment and we take our eye off the ball in the Transfer market. To watch the window close and we're back to square one with his medical history would be classic West Ham.
So the manager needs time to adapt (just like the fella at Bournemouth), but a striker who’s been injured but has scored a couple of goals “doesn’t cut it”??
Of course what he's done so far doesn't cut it. Why, are you satisfied with what he's produced so far? Just like the manager, they both need to do a lot more. 2 poxy consolation goals once the games have gone for what he's cost us after 10 appearances, starting 4 of them I'm afraid doesn't cut it, no.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 21:50
by goose
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 21:31
442 minutes of game time and only 2 consolation goals scored once the opposition have long won the game and switched off doesn't cut it.
My fear now is West Ham thinking he's doing enough with his occasional consolation moment and we take our eye off the ball in the Transfer market. To watch the window close and we're back to square one with his medical history would be classic West Ham.
So the manager needs time to adapt (just like the fella at Bournemouth), but a striker who’s been injured but has scored a couple of goals “doesn’t cut it”??
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 21:31
by Massive Attack
442 minutes of game time and only 2 consolation goals scored once the opposition have long won the game and switched off doesn't cut it.
My fear now is West Ham thinking he's doing enough with his occasional consolation moment and we take our eye off the ball in the Transfer market. To watch the window close and we're back to square one with his medical history would be classic West Ham.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 21:20
by goose
A thousand apologies, I thought we were talking Lopetegui.
With Fullkrug I think there’s a decent chance #9 there, we just need to find a way of playing to his strengths.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 21:17
by camel-with-3-humps
Come on, he’s been injured. He needs a good run before throwing him on the rubbish tip of West Ham history.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 21:06
by goose
camel-with-3-humps wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 20:52
He needs more time. The same people slagging him off will be wanking violently when he improves.
How much more time do you think a coach needs? He’s had 20+ games and nobody is clear what he’s trying to do.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 20:52
by camel-with-3-humps
He needs more time. The same people slagging him off will be wanking violently when he improves.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 18:43
by Massive Attack
And he was just about to get hooked for Ings being readied to come on until Soucek found him with a lovely ball. I did see a couple of nice touches as well and he did make a bit more effort but it's all consolation Football. He needs to be banging them in, getting in to better positions and causing a real nuisance long before the games well and truly gone late on. And yes he cannot run at all, forever treading treacle throughout from minute 1 he's on the pitch blowing out his arse. If people are happy with that, then their expectations are far lower than mine for a £96k a week £27M major Striker signing.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 18:30
by WHUFCUSA
Can’t run. Missed easy headers due to poor timing. Scored a goal…yeah but what else did he do? Turning point was the ‘foul’ when we had 2 v 1 (Summerville pressed and won the ball fairly)
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 18:22
by Hammer and Pickle
Everyone loves a Vexed rant!
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 17:33
by camel-with-3-humps
Vexed - you are an embarrassment to this forum.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 17:00
by Massive Attack
Vexed wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 16:54
Fullkrug a passenger?
You clearly didn’t watch the game.
I hope he fucks off back to Germany WHERE it seems his poor little achy heart yearns to eat curry wurst out of his big hairy mother's cսnt.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 16:58
by Mad Ferret
Yeah and obviously a simpleton like Far Right would find it amusing.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 16:56
by Far Cough UKunt
Vexed wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 16:54
Fullkrug a passenger?
You clearly didn’t watch the game.
Homesick Nic was just as shit as anyone else yesterday. I hope he fucks off back to Germany WHERE it seems his poor little achy heart yearns to eat curry wurst out of his big hairy mother's cսnt.
Oh well done you scored another meaningless fucking consolation goal nobody gives a fuck about, have a fucking slow clap you shit toothed bricklayer masquerading as a professional footballer looking prick. May as well stick a lamppost in their box and just ping balls at it. Better yet a fucking swingball set so at least some cսnt can derive even the lowest level of enjoyment out of a trip to watch West Ham, rather than watch this shovel faced speng standing around offering fuck all.
Yeah great fucking game, brilliant yeah, we scored a goal BRILLIANT, FUCKING LOPPY IN, FULKRUG FOR FUCKING HAMMER OF THE YEAR, cսnt IS BRILLIANT AINT HE? .
The absolute worst signing. Wurst signing HAHAHAHAHAHABABABABABABABABBBBHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABABAH. Funny innit. What a great performance we put in, only 4-1. Brilliant progress. Better than 5-0 innit yeah brilliant, serve me up some more 4-1 losses I fuckin love em. Prideless cunts.
Fuck off.
ag ag ag top rant.
Re: Lopetegui
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 16:55
by Mad Ferret
Trying too hard there, Vexed son.
