Page 261 of 473

NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 10 Mar 2016, 09:51
by crystal falace
"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 30 Oct 2019, 10:51
by crystal falace
"never seen anyone openly tanking to the level of the Fins, The colts the year Manning got injured was the last time a team properly tanked in the ""suck for Luck"" campaign, Just think it makes sense for teams who are going nowhere to try and get draft capital for some of the players who are nearing the ends of their contract and are not going to be extended. What would really make me laugh is if Tua refused to go to the dolphins when they take him number 1 overall"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 30 Oct 2019, 00:49
by zebthecat
As long they don't require a 2 point conversion

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 30 Oct 2019, 00:42
by southbankbornnbred
Nonsense. The Fish would at least take the Monarchs into overtime. ;-)

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 30 Oct 2019, 00:08
by Grumpster
"If we're being honest, the jets and fins dont actually need to throw any games as they couldnt even beat the london monarchs at the moment."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:53
by southbankbornnbred
"So here we go: eight weeks of utter horseshit, bile, vitriol, self-interest and false promises - and to no avail because it won't fully resolve the key issue. But enough about the Jets' failure to sack Gase - what about the UK's general election? Boom-tish! I thank you...I thank you...no, really...you guys...you're the best audience...I couldn't do it without you..."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:44
by Hermit Road
Seems like a better idea Irons. The encouragement to absolutely thank produces amusing results but surely it can't be what competitive sports are about.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:37
by ironsofcanada
"Hermit Road 10:27 Tue Oct 29 Why other North American sports have a draft lottery, with placing giving you weight but does not absolutely determine your place."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:32
by southbankbornnbred
"I wouldn't mind, at least the Fish have been trying to tank. Until today, we (Jets) have actually been trying to win. Gase is just such an unmitigated clusterfuck as head coach that we've still achieved a 1-6 record. Incidentally, what's the recent common denominator between the Jets and Fish? Give you a clue - he doesn't have a clue..."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:27
by Hermit Road
It's definitely a massive flaw in the draft system where teams at some point are encouraged to do as shit as possible.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 22:22
by zebthecat
Jets and Fins having a tank off. Their games to come are going to be hilarious - Darnold and Fitzpatrick having an interception competition.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 21:54
by southbankbornnbred
Breathes sigh of relief as Dallas miss out on trade for Jamal Adams...

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 21:45
by southbankbornnbred
"This attempt at a clear-out by the Jets today, ahead of the trade deadline (Williams already gone but Adams, Bell and Anderson all in talks with other teams) is a shit attempt by Gase and his patsy GM to save their jobs. They know that if they ship out our best players for high draft picks, then they have an ""excuse"" for tanking the season and going 1-15 or 2-14 or so. My guess is that they are thinking that will get them a second season - the idea that they will claim ""well, we had to trade our best guys mid-way through our first year: they wanted to go"". It's pathetic and the owners should see through it and sack the pair of them immediately. Gase is 1-6 having tried his ass off - he just isn't good enough. He's a walking disaster. Couldn't care less if we still end up without the players (although Adams staying put would be great) - but at least we'll have a shot of ending this utter nonsense with Gase and starting afresh under a half-decent coach."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 21:33
by southbankbornnbred
"Hermit - we had the cameras at the Jets years ago, and it didn't make a blind bit of difference. Which just goes to show that ""cancer"" is our normal state of affairs! ;-)"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 21:18
by Hermit Road
Apparently the Eagles are the subject of All Or Nothing this season so no wonder things are going pear-shaped. That programme is a cancer.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 21:14
by Hermit Road
Last thing the Eagles need is a RB. Howard is putting in the yards and Sanders looks good with Sproles still around too. The Birds should be focusing on the O Line and the secondary.

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 20:50
by southbankbornnbred
"Apparently the Bell-to-Eagles thing is bullshit based on a misreporting. So we might still have a running back, at least."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 20:47
by colchesterhammer
"I don't think we, the Chiefs, are prepared to cough up what the Jets are asking for Bell. Although our running game could really do with some help, what we really need is a run stuffing LB or S."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 20:45
by southbankbornnbred
"Way things are going at the moment, next year's draft order is going to be... 1. NY Jets. 2. NY Jets. 3. NY Jets. 4. NY Jets. 5. Miami. 6. Cincinnati. ... 32. Patsies."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 20:41
by southbankbornnbred
"Looks like Bell has agreed to join the Eagles, providing they can match his salary. That would be a good pick up for the birds. This according to Ian Rappaport from NFL.com Meanwhile, Jets want #1 round pick and more from Dallas for Jamal Adams. Basically, the Jets have started a closing down sale without telling the good folk of New York that they are closing down. I have no idea who will be left after all of this - but I suspect we'll have some cap room. Sheesh. Just sack this fucking idiot Gase now and get it over with."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 20:26
by southbankbornnbred
"To put this into context, what the Jets are currently doing is akin to those dark days when West Ham sold Cole, Johnson, Defoe, Carrick and others in the aftermath of their relegation (I know - Defoe and Carrick were a little after the first two, but you get the point). If they trade Adams, all hell will break loose."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 20:22
by southbankbornnbred
"Jesus Fucking Christ! The Jets are shopping Jamal Adams around the league, as well as Bell. Gase and his phoney GM will be lucky to get out of the stadium alive after the next game if they let Adams go. He's already one of the top three safeties in the league - and could go on to be the very best. He's also our team captain and talisman. Gates is happy to see what he can get for trades. Why is there never a drive-by on the people who need them most?!"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 18:59
by southbankbornnbred
"The Chiefs would be ideal for Bell, especially after losing Mahomes to injury. But they'd have to cough up a very high draft pick for him. Alternatively, we just sack Gase, appoint Williams as interim HC, and bring in a decent OC who will use Bell properly. But he won't win a super bowl during his time with the Jets - and probably won't make the play-offs within two years, either."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 18:47
by southbankbornnbred
"If he goes, then my gut feeling is that Gase will follow him out of the door very quickly - pushed by the owners who are probably going to cut their losses. Letting Bell go would be a sign that they are going to do it all differently, again, under a new HC. Utterly pathetic waste of time, resources and energy, this whole dalliance with the frog-eyed idiot Gase. The only qualifier I would add is that it was the former GM who chose Bell, not Gase's mate who is currently in charge. So there's a feeling that Gase did not want Bell and would have spent the cash on a WR."

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 18:43
by crystal falace
"seems like the Chiefs and texans are the 2 teams most interested in Bell. Chiefs offence would be borderline unstoppable with Bell, i cant imagine the texans have much draft capital left to trade after the huge tunsil deal"

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Posted: 29 Oct 2019, 18:43
by southbankbornnbred
"Right now we have a HC who is clearly out of his depth and on borrowed time and, foolishly, we have allowed him to put his own GM in charge of wider team affairs. So they'll most likely both have to go. Shambles. If I'm one of the best running backs in the league, which Bell is, then I'd look hard at any offers. He's good enough to be winning super bowls."