Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Epstein Files

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
LeroysBoots
Posts: 435
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 13 times

The Epstein Files

Post LeroysBoots »

Prince Andrew - Ya Filthy Animal !
nychammer
Posts: 1411
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post nychammer »

"Seems like Bill ""Likes' them Young"" Clinton and Prince ""give him whatever he demands"" Andrew have the biggest cases to answer here. Trump was associated but they apparently stopped by his Casino some time or something so seems he has little to worry about (for once) like many other names coming up that have innocent association."
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

'You fail the really basic simple stuff' Trump was not found 'guilty' of rape as he wasn't charged. He wasn't found liable for rape either. Mueller's report failed. John Durham's report found the FBI had no actual evidence to investigate to begin with. You can spin things however you want but you're only lying to yourself.
bruuuno
Posts: 536
Old WHO Number: 20510
Been liked: 1 time

Re: The Epstein Files

Post bruuuno »

Capithole bore off you spastic gibberish retard cսnt
Capitol Man
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 210376

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Capitol Man »

"riosleftsock 12:17 Sat Jan 6 Re: The Epstein Files You question was a stupid one Bovine. It shows your grasp of basic concepts is so poor that you say such incredibly stupid things. It came before a jury, they decided it was not material, and he was found to have raped her. The jury deemed it irrelevant or non consequential but you read something online and decide you know better than the people in the room whether it,was something that undermined the case. It is very funny watching someone like you trying to lay out a little gotcha - when it just marks you out as someone who was mugged off by statements made outside the courtroom to try and distract from the fact that Trump is a rapist."
Capitol Man
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 210376

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Capitol Man »

Not at all bovine. There was no evidence of a “conspiracy.” Did you not understand what was said? Or what the difference was. You fail the really basic simple stuff. Do you think that how you get mugged off all the time - a lack of basic knowledge at such a fundamental level that it makes it easy to manipulate you?
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Capitol Man 11:16 Fri Jan 5 That’s like there was no evidence of collusion but he isn’t exonerated as we still claim there was. So he is going to face criminal charges for rape or not?
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post riosleftsock »

"I'm sure you are much more successful than billionaire Trump and his beautiful, supermodel wife, Gopnik."
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"You trying to say, spambottroll2, that you still believe you can pretend Trump is not, in fact, a toxic sex-pest loser?"
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post riosleftsock »

"You didn't answer my question Capitol, that's ok, neither did Carroll or her legal team. I do understand the law, which is why I know it was obvious lawfare by more loony lefties, as do more and more voters in the US"
Capitol Man
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 210376

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Capitol Man »

"Bovine - I know you don't support the rule of law, but you understand the different evidential standards of a court, even a civil court, and the stuff you read on the internet? I mean 90% of the stuff you post says you are oblivious to stuff like that, but lets see if you do."
riosleftsock
Posts: 1758
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 274 times
Been liked: 88 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post riosleftsock »

Capitol What date was Jean Carroll raped on?
J.Riddle
Posts: 273
Old WHO Number: 237845

Re: The Epstein Files

Post J.Riddle »

Has Teflon Tony the slippery snake been caught with his pants down yet?
Northern Sold
Posts: 1110
Old WHO Number: 21756

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Northern Sold »

GRAB 'EM BY THE PUSSAAAY!!
Capitol Man
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 210376

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Capitol Man »

"The judge's exact words. You really do talk some utter shit slops. “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.” Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.” According to the muggie sloppy fucker being found to have raped someone by a jury isn't enough to say he raped her."
joyo
Posts: 738
Old WHO Number: 10598

Re: The Epstein Files

Post joyo »

"Sexcase,sexcase hang him hang him"
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

"Well it isn’t the same is it, you din. He isn’t on a register. He was never charged with any crime. There was no proof that could have ever convicted him. Her rape claims didn’t even hold up in a civil case."
joyo
Posts: 738
Old WHO Number: 10598

Re: The Epstein Files

Post joyo »

Oh that's OK then FFS! Still a sexcase and mate of Epstein
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

"'he is a convicted sex case in a civil case' He wasn't convicted, he was found liable."
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

"'he is a convicted sex case in a civil case' He wasn't convicted, he was found liable."
joyo
Posts: 738
Old WHO Number: 10598

Re: The Epstein Files

Post joyo »

"Thickle why don't you give it a rest Trump never went to the peado island,but he is a convicted sex case in a civil case Not surprised Clinton went there though"
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 3967
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 394 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Mike Oxsaw »

PwoperNaughtyButNot clearly knows nothing when he sees it.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"So, PwoperDivvyOrWhat, the claim is you know the contents of my brain. Alright let’s play: right now the category is all the weaknesses of the Biden presidency. Kindly list at least five of the ten items my brain is considering right now."
PwoperNaughtyButNot
Posts: 271
Old WHO Number: 234553
Been liked: 1 time

Re: The Epstein Files

Post PwoperNaughtyButNot »

"Your brain is not able to compute that just because I don’t believe everything you are told about trump doesn’t mean I love him. Likewise, your brain doesn’t allow you to believe anything negative about Biden and because he opposes trump you have to love him."
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Epstein Files

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"That’s certainly all you are for the likes of Trump. Question is, what are you doing about it?"
PwoperNaughtyButNot
Posts: 271
Old WHO Number: 234553
Been liked: 1 time

Re: The Epstein Files

Post PwoperNaughtyButNot »

Thanks for calling me a political resource ?
Post Reply