AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Epstein Files
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 435
- Old WHO Number: 10197
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 13 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"Seems like Bill ""Likes' them Young"" Clinton and Prince ""give him whatever he demands"" Andrew have the biggest cases to answer here. Trump was associated but they apparently stopped by his Casino some time or something so seems he has little to worry about (for once) like many other names coming up that have innocent association."
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: The Epstein Files
'You fail the really basic simple stuff' Trump was not found 'guilty' of rape as he wasn't charged. He wasn't found liable for rape either. Mueller's report failed. John Durham's report found the FBI had no actual evidence to investigate to begin with. You can spin things however you want but you're only lying to yourself.
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: The Epstein Files
"riosleftsock 12:17 Sat Jan 6 Re: The Epstein Files You question was a stupid one Bovine. It shows your grasp of basic concepts is so poor that you say such incredibly stupid things. It came before a jury, they decided it was not material, and he was found to have raped her. The jury deemed it irrelevant or non consequential but you read something online and decide you know better than the people in the room whether it,was something that undermined the case. It is very funny watching someone like you trying to lay out a little gotcha - when it just marks you out as someone who was mugged off by statements made outside the courtroom to try and distract from the fact that Trump is a rapist."
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: The Epstein Files
Not at all bovine. There was no evidence of a “conspiracy.” Did you not understand what was said? Or what the difference was. You fail the really basic simple stuff. Do you think that how you get mugged off all the time - a lack of basic knowledge at such a fundamental level that it makes it easy to manipulate you?
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: The Epstein Files
Capitol Man 11:16 Fri Jan 5 That’s like there was no evidence of collusion but he isn’t exonerated as we still claim there was. So he is going to face criminal charges for rape or not?
-
- Posts: 1758
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 88 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"I'm sure you are much more successful than billionaire Trump and his beautiful, supermodel wife, Gopnik."
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"You trying to say, spambottroll2, that you still believe you can pretend Trump is not, in fact, a toxic sex-pest loser?"
-
- Posts: 1758
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 88 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"You didn't answer my question Capitol, that's ok, neither did Carroll or her legal team. I do understand the law, which is why I know it was obvious lawfare by more loony lefties, as do more and more voters in the US"
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: The Epstein Files
"Bovine - I know you don't support the rule of law, but you understand the different evidential standards of a court, even a civil court, and the stuff you read on the internet? I mean 90% of the stuff you post says you are oblivious to stuff like that, but lets see if you do."
-
- Posts: 1758
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 88 times
-
- Posts: 1110
- Old WHO Number: 21756
-
- Posts: 561
- Old WHO Number: 210376
Re: The Epstein Files
"The judge's exact words. You really do talk some utter shit slops. “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.” Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.” According to the muggie sloppy fucker being found to have raped someone by a jury isn't enough to say he raped her."
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"Well it isn’t the same is it, you din. He isn’t on a register. He was never charged with any crime. There was no proof that could have ever convicted him. Her rape claims didn’t even hold up in a civil case."
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"'he is a convicted sex case in a civil case' He wasn't convicted, he was found liable."
-
- Posts: 1022
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"'he is a convicted sex case in a civil case' He wasn't convicted, he was found liable."
Re: The Epstein Files
"Thickle why don't you give it a rest Trump never went to the peado island,but he is a convicted sex case in a civil case Not surprised Clinton went there though"
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3967
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"So, PwoperDivvyOrWhat, the claim is you know the contents of my brain. Alright let’s play: right now the category is all the weaknesses of the Biden presidency. Kindly list at least five of the ten items my brain is considering right now."
-
- Posts: 271
- Old WHO Number: 234553
- Been liked: 1 time
Re: The Epstein Files
"Your brain is not able to compute that just because I don’t believe everything you are told about trump doesn’t mean I love him. Likewise, your brain doesn’t allow you to believe anything negative about Biden and because he opposes trump you have to love him."
- Hammer and Pickle
- Posts: 4006
- Old WHO Number: 211190
- Has liked: 99 times
- Been liked: 133 times
Re: The Epstein Files
"That’s certainly all you are for the likes of Trump. Question is, what are you doing about it?"
-
- Posts: 271
- Old WHO Number: 234553
- Been liked: 1 time