Page 35 of 391
Woke watch
Posted: 27 Jul 2021, 12:33
by arsene york-hunt
"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 21:17
by goose
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 21:07
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 21:02
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 20:52
You didn't say british numpty. You have lost the argument J1had1
Hahaha you cretin.
You think Nicaraguan history is relevant to a British PM? You’ve proven countless times that you have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about.
They should get you a medal or something, I’ve genuinely never met anyone so dumb.
Maybe step out of your middle class bubble J1had1.
You wanted to know what a dictator is dumb dumb.
have a good night J1had1
No I didn’t. You’ve made that up again.
You posted some shit about learning lessons from history about tyranny. I’ve asked you what lessons are relevant to this conversation, you came up with Idi Amin. Do you need an explanation about how there’s zero relevance?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 21:13
by goose
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 21:05
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:39
Jaan - firstly let’s be clear I didn’t vote for Labour - but I have a certain amount of sympathy for them given what they inherited.
pensioners winter fuel allowance - absolutely this should be means tested. I think they made the right call here.
above average public sector pay rises - I’m on the fence on this one. As a figure it looks high but are they deserving of a pay rise? I’d say so.
farmers and inheritance tax - again if it’s means tested I’m onboard with it.
employer NIC - no I think it’s counter productive. It’ll just get passed on to consumers.
however there is a big hole in public finances and it has to come from somewhere.
Funding Ukraine
Putting up young men in hotels at the expense of the tax payer
Climate change bollox
Giving pay rises the the far left unions that have beem hijacked by marxist/commies
DEI and other woke projects
Money to farmers abroad
yet it the elderly that suffer
british farmers that suffer
the working class/normal everyday person that suffers
even our army are suffering.
no matter how shit the consocialists were everyone knew labour would be much worse. Hence why only 10million voted for them.
honestly don't know why we bother to entertain you. You are out of touch with reality. Anyway have a good one J1had1
Funding Ukraine
**Labour didn’t just start this did they? you’re happy for Putin to just invade your allies?
Putting up young men in hotels at the expense of the tax payer
**because this just started happening when Labour won?
Climate change bollox
**how exactly are they funding that?
Giving pay rises the the far left unions that have beem hijacked by marxist/commies
**they pay the unions out of the public purse now?
DEI and other woke projects
**such as?
Money to farmers abroad
**eh?
yet it the elderly that suffer
**you clearly don’t understand what means testing is
british farmers that suffer
**again you clearly don’t understand the issue, do you think James Dyson is suffering?
the working class/normal everyday person that suffers
even our army are suffering.
**again just made up rubbish. What exactly have Labour done to the army you div
every time you post this rubbish you just make yourself look so stupid
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 21:07
by Leavemyarcelona
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 21:02
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 20:52
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:41
Oh those well know British PMs.
You didn't say british numpty. You have lost the argument J1had1
Hahaha you cretin.
You think Nicaraguan history is relevant to a British PM? You’ve proven countless times that you have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about.
They should get you a medal or something, I’ve genuinely never met anyone so dumb.
Maybe step out of your middle class bubble J1had1.
You wanted to know what a dictator is dumb dumb.
have a good night J1had1
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 21:05
by Leavemyarcelona
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:39
Jaan - firstly let’s be clear I didn’t vote for Labour - but I have a certain amount of sympathy for them given what they inherited.
pensioners winter fuel allowance - absolutely this should be means tested. I think they made the right call here.
above average public sector pay rises - I’m on the fence on this one. As a figure it looks high but are they deserving of a pay rise? I’d say so.
farmers and inheritance tax - again if it’s means tested I’m onboard with it.
employer NIC - no I think it’s counter productive. It’ll just get passed on to consumers.
however there is a big hole in public finances and it has to come from somewhere.
Funding Ukraine
Putting up young men in hotels at the expense of the tax payer
Climate change bollox
Giving pay rises the the far left unions that have beem hijacked by marxist/commies
DEI and other woke projects
Money to farmers abroad
yet it the elderly that suffer
british farmers that suffer
the working class/normal everyday person that suffers
even our army are suffering.
no matter how shit the consocialists were everyone knew labour would be much worse. Hence why only 10million voted for them.
honestly don't know why we bother to entertain you. You are out of touch with reality. Anyway have a good one J1had1
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 21:02
by goose
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 20:52
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:41
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:36
J1had1 are you seriously wanting me to do all the leg work for you? Books and the net is your friend they are not to hard to find in this day and age. Don't be lazy. However i will start you off but you will have to do the rest. Anastasio Somoza Debayle, Idi Amin. Enjoy
Oh those well know British PMs.
You didn't say british numpty. You have lost the argument J1had1
Hahaha you cretin.
You think Nicaraguan history is relevant to a British PM? You’ve proven countless times that you have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about.
They should get you a medal or something, I’ve genuinely never met anyone so dumb.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 20:52
by Leavemyarcelona
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:41
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:36
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:47
When and where has history showed us tyrants not giving up power?
J1had1 are you seriously wanting me to do all the leg work for you? Books and the net is your friend they are not to hard to find in this day and age. Don't be lazy. However i will start you off but you will have to do the rest. Anastasio Somoza Debayle, Idi Amin. Enjoy
Oh those well know British PMs.
You didn't say british numpty. You have lost the argument J1had1
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 20:01
by Massive Attack
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:39
but it's not possible to embarrass people who have no shame.
A very good point to be fair.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 19:49
by Jaan Kenbrovin
There are council elections next year, and much like any by elections, this could indicate how they are likely to fare.
it’s also not just bad policy decisions but their overall conduct. The Starmer freebies. Sue Gray. Rachel Reeves blagging.
It’s impossible to find something positive about them so far.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 19:41
by goose
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 19:36
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:47
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:39
You alright J1had1? I never said he was going anywhere, i said the people will not tolerate is leadership, whether short term or long term. Labour better make the most of whatever time they have in power, come next election they will be extinct. Yh i saw a clip of the cսnt. As i said evil tyrants don't give up power easily, history has taught us that. What i am expecting his approval rating continue to plummet which will affect his party. Whether they have the bottle to get rid of the commie cսnt, will wait and see. What we will also see is a lot of his mps will lose seats. To either Reform or Consocialists. Don't even know why i am even entertaining your ilk
When and where has history showed us tyrants not giving up power?
J1had1 are you seriously wanting me to do all the leg work for you? Books and the net is your friend they are not to hard to find in this day and age. Don't be lazy. However i will start you off but you will have to do the rest. Anastasio Somoza Debayle, Idi Amin. Enjoy
Oh those well know British PMs.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 19:39
by Nurse Ratched
Jaan, the signatories and social media commenters are wasting their time. A hundred million people could sign that petition, but it's not possible to embarrass people who have no shame.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 19:39
by goose
Jaan - firstly let’s be clear I didn’t vote for Labour - but I have a certain amount of sympathy for them given what they inherited.
pensioners winter fuel allowance - absolutely this should be means tested. I think they made the right call here.
above average public sector pay rises - I’m on the fence on this one. As a figure it looks high but are they deserving of a pay rise? I’d say so.
farmers and inheritance tax - again if it’s means tested I’m onboard with it.
employer NIC - no I think it’s counter productive. It’ll just get passed on to consumers.
however there is a big hole in public finances and it has to come from somewhere.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 19:36
by Leavemyarcelona
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:47
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:39
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:13
Why? What are you expecting to happen?
Did you see Starmer on TV? He basically said as much as you’ve been told…….. it’s not going anywhere.
You alright J1had1? I never said he was going anywhere, i said the people will not tolerate is leadership, whether short term or long term. Labour better make the most of whatever time they have in power, come next election they will be extinct. Yh i saw a clip of the cսnt. As i said evil tyrants don't give up power easily, history has taught us that. What i am expecting his approval rating continue to plummet which will affect his party. Whether they have the bottle to get rid of the commie cսnt, will wait and see. What we will also see is a lot of his mps will lose seats. To either Reform or Consocialists. Don't even know why i am even entertaining your ilk
When and where has history showed us tyrants not giving up power?
J1had1 are you seriously wanting me to do all the leg work for you? Books and the net is your friend they are not to hard to find in this day and age. Don't be lazy. However i will start you off but you will have to do the rest. Anastasio Somoza Debayle, Idi Amin. Enjoy
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 19:27
by Jaan Kenbrovin
Not sure how anyone can argue public opinion holds no weight in politics.
This petition, whilst never likely to achieve its call, is going to shine a light on how awful people think this Labour government have been. Far more so than the rating polls that Starmer is clearly faltering in.
They would have to be even more moronic than I think they are, to just carry on pissing in the face of the majority of voters.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:47
by goose
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:39
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:13
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:02
However you look at it labour will be very nervous and twitchy
Why? What are you expecting to happen?
Did you see Starmer on TV? He basically said as much as you’ve been told…….. it’s not going anywhere.
You alright J1had1? I never said he was going anywhere, i said the people will not tolerate is leadership, whether short term or long term. Labour better make the most of whatever time they have in power, come next election they will be extinct. Yh i saw a clip of the cսnt. As i said evil tyrants don't give up power easily, history has taught us that. What i am expecting his approval rating continue to plummet which will affect his party. Whether they have the bottle to get rid of the commie cսnt, will wait and see. What we will also see is a lot of his mps will lose seats. To either Reform or Consocialists. Don't even know why i am even entertaining your ilk
When and where has history showed us tyrants not giving up power?
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:45
by Mike Oxsaw
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:39
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:13
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:02
However you look at it labour will be very nervous and twitchy
Why? What are you expecting to happen?
Did you see Starmer on TV? He basically said as much as you’ve been told…….. it’s not going anywhere.
You alright J1had1? I never said he was going anywhere, i said the people will not tolerate is leadership, whether short term or long term. Labour better make the most of whatever time they have in power, come next election they will be extinct. Yh i saw a clip of the cսnt. As i said evil tyrants don't give up power easily, history has taught us that. What i am expecting his approval rating continue to plummet which will affect his party. Whether they have the bottle to get rid of the commie cսnt, will wait and see. What we will also see is a lot of his mps will lose seats. To either Reform or Consocialists. Don't even know why i am even entertaining your ilk
Dianne Abbot's waiting in the wings for her big chance...
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:39
by Leavemyarcelona
goose wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:13
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:02
easthammer wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:00
2.5 million votes represent approximately 5% of those registered as eligible to vote. And in case some of you haven't noticed, it means that 95% of those eligible to vote haven't yet signed the petition. And this assumes that all those signing are legitimate voters. I think it has a long way to go before its supporters should get too excited. However, I suspect they will,
However you look at it labour will be very nervous and twitchy
Why? What are you expecting to happen?
Did you see Starmer on TV? He basically said as much as you’ve been told…….. it’s not going anywhere.
You alright J1had1? I never said he was going anywhere, i said the people will not tolerate is leadership, whether short term or long term. Labour better make the most of whatever time they have in power, come next election they will be extinct. Yh i saw a clip of the cսnt. As i said evil tyrants don't give up power easily, history has taught us that. What i am expecting his approval rating continue to plummet which will affect his party. Whether they have the bottle to get rid of the commie cսnt, will wait and see. What we will also see is a lot of his mps will lose seats. To either Reform or Consocialists. Don't even know why i am even entertaining your ilk
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:38
by Massive Attack
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:49
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:32
Context is important when you consider how many and in such an extremely short space of time.
The petition was only set up last Friday I think someone stated and has already over 2.6M in that time. I think you have to prove you have a legitimate Email account and can only vote once. At that rate, I think it speaks volumes about the level of anger across the Country when you look at how widespread it is.
I hear you but with the majority Labour have, they'll just give this the finger and tell everybody to vote them out of office at the next GE.
Absolute contempt for the general population.
They're fucked when the economy doesn't grow fast enough to fund their pet projects and even the NHS will be cast adrift in their attempts to stay "in power".
Oh for sure. It's more about making a big statement than anything that the people really aint happy one bit, which is shocking (for them) considering how early it's gone so sour so quickly.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:13
by goose
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 18:02
easthammer wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:00
2.5 million votes represent approximately 5% of those registered as eligible to vote. And in case some of you haven't noticed, it means that 95% of those eligible to vote haven't yet signed the petition. And this assumes that all those signing are legitimate voters. I think it has a long way to go before its supporters should get too excited. However, I suspect they will,
However you look at it labour will be very nervous and twitchy
Why? What are you expecting to happen?
Did you see Starmer on TV? He basically said as much as you’ve been told…….. it’s not going anywhere.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:02
by Leavemyarcelona
easthammer wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:00
2.5 million votes represent approximately 5% of those registered as eligible to vote. And in case some of you haven't noticed, it means that 95% of those eligible to vote haven't yet signed the petition. And this assumes that all those signing are legitimate voters. I think it has a long way to go before its supporters should get too excited. However, I suspect they will,
However you look at it labour will be very nervous and twitchy
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 18:01
by Leavemyarcelona
mallard wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:54
Have 2.5 million people really signed it?Ultimately, it's impossible to say. However, based on petition data, it is likely at least some of the signatures are not real - particularly given people appear to have signed it from places such as North Korea and the Antarctic.To sign a government petition, you need a valid email address and a postcode - but there are no clear checks on this, meaning it is open to abuse. The petition data, at the bottom of the page breaks down the number of supposed signatures by county and UK constituency. But this isn't necessarily accurate. For example, the petition data shows that nine people from the British Antarctic Territory have signed - and while around 30 people live at scientific research centres in the territory during the winter, it would seem quite a leap that the petition has found a strong foothold with almost a third of the population there.That said, the data shows an overwhelming number of signatures appear to be from the UK - around 2.52 million of the 2.54 million total, as of 7.45am on 26 November.If accurate, the petition data would indicate that a large number of signatures come from people in constituencies that elected a Conservative MP in July, although several Labour seats including Hexham, North Northumberland and Bishop Aukland have also seen thousands of people seemingly sign it.”
Looking at uk data over 2million have signed it from uk
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 17:54
by mallard
Have 2.5 million people really signed it?Ultimately, it's impossible to say. However, based on petition data, it is likely at least some of the signatures are not real - particularly given people appear to have signed it from places such as North Korea and the Antarctic.To sign a government petition, you need a valid email address and a postcode - but there are no clear checks on this, meaning it is open to abuse. The petition data, at the bottom of the page breaks down the number of supposed signatures by county and UK constituency. But this isn't necessarily accurate. For example, the petition data shows that nine people from the British Antarctic Territory have signed - and while around 30 people live at scientific research centres in the territory during the winter, it would seem quite a leap that the petition has found a strong foothold with almost a third of the population there.That said, the data shows an overwhelming number of signatures appear to be from the UK - around 2.52 million of the 2.54 million total, as of 7.45am on 26 November.If accurate, the petition data would indicate that a large number of signatures come from people in constituencies that elected a Conservative MP in July, although several Labour seats including Hexham, North Northumberland and Bishop Aukland have also seen thousands of people seemingly sign it.”
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 17:51
by WHU(Exeter)
Who are the Zambian women’s and Orlando Pride’s women’s team kit manufacturers and why isn’t there an outcry against them that Barbra Banda’s shirt isn’t flooding the likes of JD Sports?
she sounds that popular and they’d be able to make a killing over Christmas.
Hands up anyone who hasn’t got anyone on their Christmas list, who would love more than anything else a Barbra Banda Zambian or Orland Pride shirt, complete with name and number? Now she’s got that BBC award and all,,,
Its prejudice gone mad.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 17:49
by Mike Oxsaw
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑26 Nov 2024, 17:32
Context is important when you consider how many and in such an extremely short space of time.
The petition was only set up last Friday I think someone stated and has already over 2.6M in that time. I think you have to prove you have a legitimate Email account and can only vote once. At that rate, I think it speaks volumes about the level of anger across the Country when you look at how widespread it is.
I hear you but with the majority Labour have, they'll just give this the finger and tell everybody to vote them out of office at the next GE.
Absolute contempt for the general population.
They're fucked when the economy doesn't grow fast enough to fund their pet projects and even the NHS will be cast adrift in their attempts to stay "in power".
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 17:32
by Massive Attack
Context is important when you consider how many and in such an extremely short space of time.
The petition was only set up last Friday I think someone stated and has already over 2.6M in that time. I think you have to prove you have a legitimate Email account and can only vote once. At that rate, I think it speaks volumes about the level of anger across the Country when you look at how widespread it is.
Re: Woke watch
Posted: 26 Nov 2024, 17:00
by easthammer
2.5 million votes represent approximately 5% of those registered as eligible to vote. And in case some of you haven't noticed, it means that 95% of those eligible to vote haven't yet signed the petition. And this assumes that all those signing are legitimate voters. I think it has a long way to go before its supporters should get too excited. However, I suspect they will,