Page 358 of 389

Woke watch

Posted: 27 Jul 2021, 12:33
by arsene york-hunt
"There is a very good section on GB news where the ludicrous idiocies of Wokeness are looked at I thought we would should have one for WHO. I'll start with Baptiste on BBC: In Hungary,an ambassador's family are kidnapped by Islamic terrorists and carry out atrocities. At the end of the last episode Baptiste finds out that it is a false flag operation and conveniently, the real culprits are white supremacists who want to stop all immigration. Coronation Street ITV a gay black footballer is stopped by the police, because he is driving an expensive car. He is pushed to the ground during an altercation, and damages his leg threatening his career. Could have been written by Dawn Butler or a BLM activist."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 20 Oct 2021, 14:35
by mashed in maryland
All this shit has reached the UK too... https://twitter.com/WorldOfOrdinary/status/1450756261717368835?s=20

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 20 Oct 2021, 13:44
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Capitol Man 4:27 Mon Oct 18 'For example - is there anything that would stop a non-trans boy from actually walking into a girls' bathroom?' Yes. Not being a massive pervert rapist cսnt would probably do it.

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 20 Oct 2021, 12:39
by bigfrank
Twoleftfeet Na i swerved it and watched millwall instead üòÇ What has he said? And what happened with Jim Davidson

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 20 Oct 2021, 12:34
by lincslink
"What all the white people who over decades have bought blues, soul, motown etc and the ones who voted to give him his fame,"

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 19 Oct 2021, 23:23
by twoleftfeet
Is no one watching Ashley Banjos documentary on ITV about how shit white people are?

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 19 Oct 2021, 22:03
by Crassus
"Blimey - beat this one then ..... Three failed Miss France hopefuls SUE the pageant for selecting beauty queen contestants based on their appearance The plaintiffs argue that the companies are breaking French labour law with discriminatory selection criteria by obliging aspiring beauty queens to be more than 1.70 metres tall, single, and 'representative of beauty'."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 18:08
by Mike Oxsaw
"Somebody forgot to preface their post with ""Note to self:"", it seems."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 18:07
by Eerie Descent
"I'm with you Savage son, I thought the creepy cunts would stick together, but Fritzl has piled in on him!"

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 18:02
by Cabbage Savage
Hammer and Pickle 5:56 Mon Oct 18 I fort you like Capidulzzz. ok i no yu call him the boring kokayne kowboy but he soports Biden??

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 18:02
by Cabbage Savage
Hammer and Pickle 5:56 Mon Oct 18 I fort you like Capidulzzz. ok i no yu call him the boring kokayne kowboy but he soports Biden??

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 17:56
by Hammer and Pickle
"I think its very dull, and very tedious how you come on here with the sole purpose of gobbing off, you sad little specimen. You don't even attempt to be witty and you're nothing but an embarrassing gobshite with nothing at all to say."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 17:15
by Eerie Descent
"Proper showing your true colours here, Capitol Woman son. Very weird, very creepy."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 16:32
by Block
""" no, I'm often wrong -"" Understatement of the century."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 16:27
by Capitol Man
"MrTrentReznor 10:01 Mon Oct 18 Re: Woke watch The point is you don't know the circumstances of this attack. Did the bathroom policy in Loudin have any effect on the case, because that is why it is being talked about. For example - is there anything that would stop a non-trans boy from actually walking into a girls' bathroom? The circumstances around this one are also strange, but given the confidentiality necessary in these cases it's unlikely that there will be many more details coming out. The question here really is, did a ""woke"" bathroom policy lead to an attack and is that being covered up? There is not enough information to make that call and the Daily Wire is alluding to that while other right wing outlets go full out on that claim. Small Cock - no, I'm often wrong - given the crap you post it would appear I'm never wrong in any interaction with you - but that's more about you than me."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 15:38
by Mike Oxsaw
"Capitol Man 3:42 Mon Oct 18 Far better to be identified as someone who is confused rather than someone who will never, ever, admit to being wrong. However, if it is you doing the ""identifying"" it makes no odds either way on account of your true place in the WHO pecking order."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 11:20
by twoleftfeet
I saw that. Scottish National Theatre has banned its use DESPITE the fact no one has complained about it. They say they want to avoid any future problems. Morons.

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 11:04
by Block
Can't say the word spooky anymore.

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 10:01
by MrTrentReznor
"Capitol man, You are focusing on if he was wearing a skirt at the time of the rape, it appears. So is your point if the boy wore a skirt previously & gained access to the girls toilets he was a transgender female on those occasions. However, as it is 'unconfirmed' that the boy was wearing a skirt in the female toilet at the time of the rape then either no rape took place or if one did take place it wasn't perpetrated by a boy pretending to be a girl therefore the integrity of the transgender movement is intact because no male would ever pretend to be a female to gain access to female facilities to take advantage of females."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 03:42
by Capitol Man
Mike Oxsaw 10:14 Sun Oct 17 Re: Woke watch You seem confused yet again small cock. If people make genuine points I’m happy to have a genuine conversation. You get cunted off because of your constant shitty attempts to fish and because you appear to think you are an expert on literally everything. You occasionally stumble upon a valid point but that’s more about being a stopped clock than anything coherent value set.

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 03:25
by Capitol Man
"Fifth - “around who gets to use what bathroom” is the key here”. That’s what there doesn’t seem to be any confirmation of. Seems like the boy should have been kept out of school altogether after the first incident, but the allegation that he was “wearing a skirt” doesn’t seem to be confirmed. Then you have the rather strange line at the end where it says the girl is basically become more progressive because of the school. For context this is the specific at the heart of the culture war on this right now -and that doesn’t seem to have confirmation. States are passing “bathroom laws” about this and then facing corporate boycotts and whthaveyou. There would seem to be more to the case than meets the eye given some other parts of the report as well. As for the school superintendent - there are almost certainly specific guidelines on what he could say."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 02:41
by bigfrank
Twoleftfeet Yeah i saw that. I thought it was only us whiteys that owned slaves. See.....we have always had equality

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 17 Oct 2021, 22:31
by goose
**adds Capitol Mong to the list alongside Willitell**

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 17 Oct 2021, 22:22
by Takashi Miike
"long neck's mate making excuses for a sex case, why am I not surprised?"

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 17 Oct 2021, 22:14
by Mike Oxsaw
"Fifth Column 7:42 Sun Oct 17 Oooh! You're for it now. He'll invoke his Weirdy Way and shout ""Claude's Bib"" at you. Could get spicy."

Re: Woke watch

Posted: 17 Oct 2021, 19:42
by Fifth Column
"Capitol Sorry am I missing something. The article states ""What people did not know is that, weeks prior, on May 28, Smith says, a boy, allegedly wearing a skirt, entered a girls� bathroom at nearby Stone Bridge High School, where he sexually assaulted Smith�s ninth-grade daughter."" I've googled and subsequent to the Daily Wire article, the Police have confirmed: 'The Loudoun County Sheriff confirmed The Daily Wire’s reporting on Tuesday, noting in a statement to media that, “We can confirm a May 28, 2021 case that involved a thorough 2-month-long investigation that was conducted to determine the facts of the case prior to arrest. This case is still pending court proceedings. The Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office is not able to provide any documents that pertain to a pending case.”' So the article does correctly state that the Police have evidence that on 28th May there was a sexual assault of some form. The attorney of the victim has stated that this took place in the bathroom. There has then, according to the report, been a second assault in a classroom. I can't see where you've got ""They have zero evidence of a rape connected to any issue around who gets to use what bathroom."" from? Am I missing something here or have you mis-read the article?"