West Ham Online

For Europe and for Russia?

I'd love to watch a panel of Whoers on Question time. It would be tv gold.

Ready Breck kids :-(

Ark at gumbo calling other people thick.

"You’re pathetic attempts to make sense of world events are none of my concern, Twundle."

"Trump is thick as shit,but never in million years is he thick enough to give Alaska to Russia,but he obviously would love to suck off Putin like Jaan Kremlin and Putinsleftsock"

Hammer and Pickle 7:22 Mon Jan 29 That's not what you said though. You suggested Trump would give Alaska to Putin.

"Meanwhile, in France, the farmers have laid siege to Paris."

"That’s no a radar, Twundle - that’s your headwand. Oh and of course Putin is making a claim on Alaska. It’s not going to make an impression on you and Trump’s pillbilly electorate but beyond that, where people can read and have the right amount of toes to be able to work these things out, people will want a president with a proper foreign policy response."

The nuclear fallout might actually make Pickle better looking.

I was wondering where everyone was from the Hamas Attacks Israel and Ukraine Putin is a cսnt threads?? YOU ARE ALL ON HERE!!!!

"Pickle is shitting a brick in Poland, won't be long until he drags the cabbage patch kids and the karate instructor's bit on the side to England, the cowardly weasel."

"If it goes nuclear, a couple of 50 megatons dropped on Romford and Ilford can only improve the place."

"You're the one shitting your pants over Putin taking Alaska, the last time I checked? It hadn't even registered on my radar until you brought it up and gave me laugh at your expense (again)."

Even the suggestion has freaked you out. Interesting.

Of course I do. But that still doesn't change the fact that you suggesting Trump will give Alaska to Putin is utter nonsense though.

Hold on - do you know Alaska used to be a part of the Russian Empire?

*checks news to see if Putin has taken over Alaska yet*

"Actually, Spambottroll 3, I believe that's true - you really don't think you support Putin or Russia. But the fact is, you are so thick, so ignorant and so resentful of the West that you can't help it. You don't know who your enemy is because you are totally lost and exactly the product of Kremlin propaganda you are supposed to be. And so you really think you don't support Putin when it is perfectly obvious that is exactly what you do. Compulsively, at every opportunity."

"I think it needs to be pointed out that when paying for weapons, if you're country is the supplier of the weapons, all the costs and benefits all go into the same pot. So Ukraine aid, benefits America because Ukraine weapons are bought from American companies. Ukraine aid from America is effectively a loan to be payed back with interest. If Ukraine loses the country (i.e. Russias initial war aims) all American investment is lost. So I think America has to stay the course to realise its investment. Same with all the other European countries involved. I think America's investment needs access to the ports in the south, access to the gas/oil found. Finally a US base in the country. This seems to be the end goal. Personally, I feel like that is the ultimate reason why Russia cant really win this. There's just too much investment from the west now to go back empty handed. I feel like they'll keep the Donetsk and the east and maybe, and thats it, Back to 2014."

"Never once supported Putin or Russia, you thick warmonger."

Jaan Kremlin and putinsleftsock...two good examples of Putin apologists

Jaan Kremlin and putinsleftsock...two good examples of Putin apologists

"So let's keep this simple - as long as NATO governemnts have the sense to keep the Kremlin bogged down in Ukraine, there really is no chance of it posing a threat to any of its members. Glad that's nice and clear for everyone."

"‘ 4:13 Mon Jan 29 Re: If Russia attacks Nato what will the consequences be? Ha ha the only wankers shitting themselves over this remote possibility are the conspiracy theorists nutjobs’ Exactly. Like the US ,UK and German governments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/29/us/politics/europe-nato-russia-trump.html https://www.gbnews.com/news/nato-chief-russia-war-putin-attack-british-army#:~:text=The%20UK%20Government%20has%20warned,military%20response%20to%20counter%20Russia. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12983163/amp/vladimir-putin-nato-attack-five-eight-years-germany-predicts.html Pretty sure you was banging the hysterical ‘Putin will take over Europe’ drum not so long ago as well."

"Zeb The gdp comparison is not really that useful because the economies are geared completely differently. A better comparison would be how much a 152mm shell costs in Russia vs a 155mm shell in the west. At the start of the war the west was paying around 2k USD per shell, the prices quoted today are over 8k USD per shell. Russia is paying nothing like that."