West Ham Online

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 16:18 I think they can only get a max of 2 years (assaulting an emergency worker), and 5 years (ABH), so they likely get less than those 2 idiots who cut down a tree received.

The final act of this sorry story is the sentence the dodgy Judge gives matey. If it's less than Lucy Connolly then it goes back to stinking the Court system out..

It cannot be less or the same as 31 months for breaking the nose and assaulting Police Officers (Emergency Services) as someone with no previous and pleaded guilty straight away to a promptly deleted post online. Eyes are still watching wankers..  

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑29 Jul 2025, 01:33

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑29 Jul 2025, 01:22

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 08:07 Is it true the police transported ANTIFA away from the hotel back to their buses to get them out of the area to de-escalate any confrontation?
Or is it AS CLAIMED they transported them to the hotel to create more aggro for themselves?

I know plod can be a bit dim at times but that seems unlikely
I am happy to be informed of the facts though from our on the scene Epping Warriors 

 Epping ..Plod met them at the station and escorted them in .it' wasn't the other way around you shit stirring cսnt
In Diss.. Plod literally escorted them into the locals ...
and they weren't having it 

STABILIS

 

So, are you suggesting that the "trickle down" from the top level is to engineer an "early" confrontation where they can nick and label those who care for their children (and culture) as far-right radicals, fast-track them through the courts and, hopefully , quell such protests around the country?

Anyone with half a brain can see that opportunity window has long since passed.

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑29 Jul 2025, 01:22

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 08:07 Is it true the police transported ANTIFA away from the hotel back to their buses to get them out of the area to de-escalate any confrontation?
Or is it AS CLAIMED they transported them to the hotel to create more aggro for themselves?

I know plod can be a bit dim at times but that seems unlikely
I am happy to be informed of the facts though from our on the scene Epping Warriors 

 Epping ..Plod met them at the station and escorted them in .it' wasn't the other way around you shit stirring cսnt
In Diss.. Plod literally escorted them into the locals ...
and they weren't having it 

STABILIS

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 08:48

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 08:45

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 08:33 Again, would you have preferred the police to let them move through Epping unhindered or to keep them under control and observed?
Your call , Inspector

 

Yes.  I wouldn't want 2 tier policing.  It wouldn't have happened the other way around.

The other way round the police would have kettled them at the station in full riot gear.

You know it
"You'll never make the station"

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 08:07 Is it true the police transported ANTIFA away from the hotel back to their buses to get them out of the area to de-escalate any confrontation?
Or is it AS CLAIMED they transported them to the hotel to create more aggro for themselves?

I know plod can be a bit dim at times but that seems unlikely
I am happy to be informed of the facts though from our on the scene Epping Warriors 

BRANDED wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 06:50 The gloebalists will let them off

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 14:37 So the reports from local residents who said the violence towards the police wasn’t them who were trying to protest peacefully but outside agitators was a lie?
Glad you have clarified that it was Epping residents attacking the police. So much for peaceful protests by concerned citizens 

You also seem keen to emphasise that anyone who has a different opinion to you should be attacked and beaten in the street

 

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 11:11 When the police were being attacked with bottles & smoke bombs I read that the people of Epping were complaining that they were being blamed for the protests getting out of hand when it was outside groups 
Local residents or opportunistic thugs?

So you are in favour of violent uncontrolled confrontations happening possibly resulting in serious injury on both sides?
Can you understand that that was the fear of the police & they tried to prevent that real possibility?





 

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 15:15

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 14:37 So the reports from local residents who said the violence towards the police wasn’t them who were trying to protest peacefully but outside agitators was a lie?
Glad you have clarified that it was Epping residents attacking the police. So much for peaceful protests by concerned citizens 

You also seem keen to emphasise that anyone who has a different opinion to you should be attacked and beaten in the street



 

No, just ANTIFA. They should be beaten in the street, hospital, church, anywhere really.

I have no idea who did what, nor do you. It's not unlikely (in fact it's probable, given how the left opperates)  that what violence there might have been was instigated by left wing agitators planted inside the peaceful Epping residents to start shit to get the headlines required but the local's had enough sense not to take the bait. It's more plausible than the mythical far right narrative and typical government of  " COINTELPRO " tactics.

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 14:37 So the reports from local residents who said the violence towards the police wasn’t them who were trying to protest peacefully but outside agitators was a lie?
Glad you have clarified that it was Epping residents attacking the police. So much for peaceful protests by concerned citizens 

You also seem keen to emphasise that anyone who has a different opinion to you should be attacked and beaten in the street


 

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jul 2025, 11:11 When the police were being attacked with bottles & smoke bombs I read that the people of Epping were complaining that they were being blamed for the protests getting out of hand when it was outside groups 
Local residents or opportunistic thugs?

So you are in favour of violent uncontrolled confrontations happening possibly resulting in serious injury on both sides?
Can you understand that that was the fear of the police & they tried to prevent that real possibility?