"We're gonna have a British George Floyd now innit. The BLM mob are gonna be all over this. Expect a load of shoe shops to be looted as a ""protest"". This country's gone to the fucking dogs."
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 23:48
by Mike Oxsaw
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:50
It was posted to a local community group with 5k members.
It was posted after the Southport riots, far as I’m aware nobody who read it blew up a mosque.
I would suspect that those 5k members of said community group would have trouble blowing up a balloon, let alone a mosque.
One of them , though, is a shit-stiring grass.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 20:50
by goose
It was posted to a local community group with 5k members.
It was posted after the Southport riots, far as I’m aware nobody who read it blew up a mosque.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 20:49
by MaryMillingtonsGhost
Did her post appear on your social media account?
If it did (and you can pop up a copy as proof) I'll accept the "all & sundry" argument, otherwise I suspect somebody/bot was actively looking for such content to "highlight" and stir more shit.
No it didn't.
The point I was trying to make is it wasn't that difficult to find, if you were ACTIVELY looking for posts that'd hurt an individuals feels.
I'd be more worried about the motives of the snide who grassed her up, to be honest.
No one needs to grass her up, when it's there for all and sundry to see (read).
A soft nick for the old bill with practically zero work invloved. Just the way they appear to like it.
Did her post appear on your social media account?
If it did (and you can pop up a copy as proof) I'll accept the "all & sundry" argument, otherwise I suspect somebody/bot was actively looking for such content to "highlight" and stir more shit.
I'd be more worried about the motives of the snide who grassed her up, to be honest.
No one needs to grass her up, when it's there for all and sundry to see (read).
A soft nick for the old bill with practically zero work invloved. Just the way they appear to like it.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 20:11
by Mike Oxsaw
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:10
Wow, Goosey loosey can't see anything wrong with terrorism now. What a complete wrong 'un.
Many seem to assume that because a post on social media can be read by everyone on that platform, then it is (and instantly acted upon) by all who could read it.
Fuck me! How simple is that?
It's like saying something posted on here is read and acted upon by every single West Ham fan, no matter where in the world they live, let alone whether or not they have an account on here.
I'd be more worried about the motives of the snide who grassed her up, to be honest.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 19:21
by goose
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 19:10
Wow, Goosey loosey can't see anything wrong with terrorism now. What a complete wrong 'un.
Terrorism?? Haha you minge.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 19:10
by One Sunny Day
Wow, Goosey loosey can't see anything wrong with terrorism now. What a complete wrong 'un.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 19:06
by goose
Here’s what she actually posted to a local community group on facebook:
“It’s absolutely ridiculous. Don’t protect the mosques. Blow the mosque up with the adults in it.”
yeh stick her in prison
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 18:57
by goose
OSD - you’re a massive fanny for being scared of living next door to a middle aged woman who poses no threat to society.
But you’d happily have known criminals released from prison to make room for her. And guess what? It turns out that real criminals commit real crimes, not idle threats on FB that nobody actually reads.
Id happily kick your teeth in, should I go to prison as well?
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 18:42
by Nurse Ratched
360 - why do you keep changing your username?
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 18:41
by One Sunny Day
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 18:13
Because 50 year old woman who say stupid things on Facebook are much less of a danger than 30 something ex convicts.
As he proved by immediately sexually assaulting someone on day 1 of his release.
Once again, you're conveniently trying to down play pleading guilty to and being convicted of death threats, to "saying stupid things." And also weirdly trying to say she shouldn't go to jail because a man sexually assaulted someone and immediately got thrown in prison for it, while awaiting trial.
You are a bizarre individual who lacks basic critical thinking ability and makes no sense.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 18:13
by goose
Because 50 year old woman who say stupid things on Facebook are much less of a danger than 30 something ex convicts.
As he proved by immediately sexually assaulting someone on day 1 of his release.
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 15:59
It’s okay you got sexually assaulted love, if it wasn’t you it’d be someone else.
as for the 50 something year old woman, do you honestly believe her FB post was used by anyone as motivation to commit a crime? I doubt it.
given the option, she’s much less of a danger to the public than some of the people released to make room for her.
It would be lovely if we could accurately predict crimes in the future and punish people before they did them. Meanwhile, in the real world, you can only punish someone after they actually broke the law.
Yes, clearly all those rioters who committed crimes up and down the country, for the same false reason, all came to that line of thought and decision, at the same time, all independent of each other, including the people who exactly followed up on what she said and tried to murder people by arson. Very naive of you to think otherwise. I certainly wouldn't feel safe living next door to such an unhinged individual whose first thought of some rumour she heard is murder by fire.
Ahhh bless, does the 50 something woman with the bad words scare you?
i think I’d rather her as a neighbour than ex convict and now charged with sexual assault Amari Ward.
What's your deal with keep banging on about her being in her 50s as some sort of weird reason that's she's not dangerous? Let me guess, if her name was Aabidah, she was aged 50 and tweeting people to burn down churches with people in them, during an Islamic terrorist attack, you'd feel perfectly safe having her live next door to you and she definitely shouldn't go to prison for hurty words on the internet, right?
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 18:01
by ,
What disturbs me is not an individual using bad words ( inciting people to deeds that can be fatal ) rather it is the attitude that saying things like this in isolation is insignificant enough to be ignored.
if the peak of a pyramid is hatred sufficient to kill the base of that construct comprises loads of “bad words” from which the urge to carry out is nurtured, justified and enacted.
The individual who groped almost immediately upon conditional release is back in jail, serves him right. The women who texted bad words being banged up has got what she deserved too. Let’s hope that nobody feels encouraged by what she said sufficient to act on her words.
Hate speech needs curbing whichever group is the target.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 17:35
by Nurse Ratched
Fuck my old boots!
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 17:35
by WHU(Exeter)
Nurse, my sister used to insist on having that Beauty and the beast thing on. Also used to leave the room. There were things about that programme I really disliked, without being able to put my finger on them.
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 15:59
It’s okay you got sexually assaulted love, if it wasn’t you it’d be someone else.
as for the 50 something year old woman, do you honestly believe her FB post was used by anyone as motivation to commit a crime? I doubt it.
given the option, she’s much less of a danger to the public than some of the people released to make room for her.
It would be lovely if we could accurately predict crimes in the future and punish people before they did them. Meanwhile, in the real world, you can only punish someone after they actually broke the law.
Yes, clearly all those rioters who committed crimes up and down the country, for the same false reason, all came to that line of thought and decision, at the same time, all independent of each other, including the people who exactly followed up on what she said and tried to murder people by arson. Very naive of you to think otherwise. I certainly wouldn't feel safe living next door to such an unhinged individual whose first thought of some rumour she heard is murder by fire.
Ahhh bless, does the 50 something woman with the bad words scare you?
i think I’d rather her as a neighbour than ex convict and now charged with sexual assault Amari Ward.
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 15:59
It’s okay you got sexually assaulted love, if it wasn’t you it’d be someone else.
as for the 50 something year old woman, do you honestly believe her FB post was used by anyone as motivation to commit a crime? I doubt it.
given the option, she’s much less of a danger to the public than some of the people released to make room for her.
It would be lovely if we could accurately predict crimes in the future and punish people before they did them.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 17:10
by Nurse Ratched
WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 16:39
Murder she wrote.
what a terrible programme that was.
That stirred a memory of blandly offensive American TV series from the 1980s. My mum used to watch something called 'Beauty and the Beast'. I couldn't sit in the room when she had it on. It appeared to be a mawkish tale of romance between Sarah Connor and what looked like the cowardly lion from The Wizard of Oz, but he was all dark and mysterious and brooding an' shit. There was a bit of crime fighting and justice seeking along the way. I think he lived in the sewers or something and she was a lawyer. I've made it sound better than it was.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 16:39
by WHU(Exeter)
Murder she wrote.
what a terrible programme that was.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 16:34
by One Sunny Day
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 15:59
It’s okay you got sexually assaulted love, if it wasn’t you it’d be someone else.
as for the 50 something year old woman, do you honestly believe her FB post was used by anyone as motivation to commit a crime? I doubt it.
given the option, she’s much less of a danger to the public than some of the people released to make room for her.
It would be lovely if we could accurately predict crimes in the future and punish people before they did them. Meanwhile, in the real world, you can only punish someone after they actually broke the law.
Yes, clearly all those rioters who committed crimes up and down the country, for the same false reason, all came to that line of thought and decision, at the same time, all independent of each other, including the people who exactly followed up on what she said and tried to murder people by arson. Very naive of you to think otherwise. I certainly wouldn't feel safe living next door to such an unhinged individual whose first thought of some rumour she heard is murder by fire.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 16:11
by Nurse Ratched
goose wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 15:59
It’s okay you got sexually assaulted love, if it wasn’t you it’d be someone else.
as for the 50 something year old woman, do you honestly believe her FB post was used by anyone as motivation to commit a crime? I doubt it.
given the option, she’s much less of a danger to the public than some of the people released to make room for her.
I think it was churlish of her to report the fact he sexually assaulted her. What a buzz-kill on his first day of freedom. Bloody lesbian, probably.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 15:59
by goose
It’s okay you got sexually assaulted love, if it wasn’t you it’d be someone else.
as for the 50 something year old woman, do you honestly believe her FB post was used by anyone as motivation to commit a crime? I doubt it.
given the option, she’s much less of a danger to the public than some of the people released to make room for her.
one of the 1750 prisoners released early has been charged with a sexual assault committed on the day of his release.
but at least that 50 year old woman is banged up for saying something hateful on FB.
Bit more than saying something hateful, isn't it? She was inciting murder with racist intent in the middle of a racist riot.
As for the guy released early, he wasn't in for a sex offence or he wouldn't have been eligible for early release. A large percentage of released prisoners reoffend within a year of being released. Hardly anything to do with early release. Seriously doubt spending a couple more months inside would have made him less likely to commit sexual assault when he got out. Keeping someone banged up indefinitely incase they reoffend is unrealistic.
At least the guy is straight back to prison where he belongs for doing that. As well as the racist and dangerous cսnt of a woman who belongs in prison too.
