West Ham Online

Watch out for big revelations in the Sundays.

Cabbige Savage" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 21:11 brexsit is a big fuck

it fuck Picjkles job doing the UK benny fit claim forms for bench crew

It fuck Picjkle selling the cheap cigarets back in to london.

It fuck Picjkle getting rent on hes cowncil flat in camberwell

brexsit is a big fuck

it fuck Picjkles job doing the UK benny fit claim forms for bench crew

It fuck Picjkle selling the cheap cigarets back in to london.

It fuck Picjkle getting rent on hes cowncil flat in camberwell

Ah the sovereignty argument - there really is no arguing with it if the EU is seen as a power colonising its members, which is of course arrant nonsense. 

I’ll give up now as we really are not on the same page.

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:05 Sorry but what was Brexit for if it wasn't supposed to at least reduce immigration?

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:26

Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:21

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:05 Sorry but what was Brexit for if it wasn't supposed to at least reduce immigration?

We did it just to annoy you.

No shortage of success in that department, I’ll give you that.

Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:21

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:05 Sorry but what was Brexit for if it wasn't supposed to at least reduce immigration?

We did it just to annoy you.

I've been away, did I miss something in 'the Sundays' or was it just some Guido/Dan Wooton fantasy?

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 17:05 Sorry but what was Brexit for if it wasn't supposed to at least reduce immigration?

Sorry but what was Brexit for if it wasn't supposed to at least reduce immigration?

Brexit was never going to solve illegal immigration.  By definition that was already immigration we had legal control over and Brexit didn't add anything too (other than making some previously legal migration, now illegal based on country of origin). 

It was also never going to put a stop on legal migration, since we already had legal power over non-European legal migration, and were choosing to do next to nothing to stem it.

So technically we now have additinal control over previusly legal, European migration, and some of this would now be deemed 'illegal' migration. Brexit has delivered that.  

The 'con' is that no one in power (those that 'serve' us) has any real appetite to do anything about it.  It's all soundbites to play to the crowd, and lets people think everyone is on the same page about slowing the influx, but the reality is the powers that have been available for long before Brexit were not being exercised, so why would new powers to control legal influx from an additional area of the world be used any more effectively?

Swiss. wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 13:56

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 13:17

Swiss. wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 12:54

Can't be true. I mean after Brexit we took back control of our borders didn't we. What a bunch of fucking mugs you are. Can you all give me you mum's maiden's name, DOB and first pet's name please ? 

We have got back control of the borders but the massive government clusterfuck AFTER Brexit in implementing that control, and therefore not actually a symptom of Brexit itself, is why we are now where we are.

However, remainers still seem to cling to the mistaken belief that Brexit, and not the follow-on  government incompetence is the sole cause of illegal immigration.

I strongly suspect that the number of illegals arriving in the UK is about the same as it was before Brexit, but now there are border checks & inspections, many of those illegals are now forced to take the more scenic, photogenic route over, rather than arrive, undetected, in and on freight transport.

Oxbore and yes the while reason why I voted against Brexit. One thing is having an idea but implementing it is another. I'd like to have a threesome with Megan Fox and Margot Robbie. As to how I can implement this situation is another thing. That's why the Scots rejects Independence. Nice idea but no logistics. 

 

Turns out he's Boris Johnson in a Thin suit.*

*Which explains why he needs so much money from others for his wardrobe.

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 13:17

Swiss. wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 12:54

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 12:51

Incompetent liberal Politicians. 

Can't be true. I mean after Brexit we took back control of our borders didn't we. What a bunch of fucking mugs you are. Can you all give me you mum's maiden's name, DOB and first pet's name please ? 

We have got back control of the borders but the massive government clusterfuck AFTER Brexit in implementing that control, and therefore not actually a symptom of Brexit itself, is why we are now where we are.

However, remainers still seem to cling to the mistaken belief that Brexit, and not the follow-on  government incompetence is the sole cause of illegal immigration.

I strongly suspect that the number of illegals arriving in the UK is about the same as it was before Brexit, but now there are border checks & inspections, many of those illegals are now forced to take the more scenic, photogenic route over, rather than arrive, undetected, in and on freight transport.

Oxbore and yes the while reason why I voted against Brexit. One thing is having an idea but implementing it is another. I'd like to have a threesome with Megan Fox and Margot Robbie. As to how I can implement this situation is another thing. That's why the Scots rejects Independence. Nice idea but no logistics. 

Swiss. wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 12:54

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 12:51

Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2024, 10:03

Quite staggering considering we are an island off Europe. How is this even possible?

Incompetent liberal Politicians. 

Can't be true. I mean after Brexit we took back control of our borders didn't we. What a bunch of fucking mugs you are. Can you all give me you mum's maiden's name, DOB and first pet's name please ? 

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2024, 12:51

Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2024, 10:03

BRANDED wrote: ↑07 Oct 2024, 06:50 Britain is home to more illegal migrants than any other European nation, a new study has found.

There are up to 745,000 illegal migrants in the UK, accounting for one in 100 of the population, according to the research led by Oxford University experts.

This is more than double the 300,000 in France and ahead even of the upper estimate of 700,000 in Germany, which has the second-largest population of illegal migrants in Europe.

The figures were disclosed as the Home Office said 973 migrants in 17 small boats crossed the English Channel on Saturday, the biggest daily number this year.

The total number of people to cross in 2024 is 26,612, up five per cent on 2023 at the same stage, but 21 per cent behind the record 33,611 at this point in 2022.

Quite staggering considering we are an island off Europe. How is this even possible?

Incompetent liberal Politicians. 

Russ of the BML" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2024, 10:03

BRANDED wrote: ↑07 Oct 2024, 06:50 Britain is home to more illegal migrants than any other European nation, a new study has found.

There are up to 745,000 illegal migrants in the UK, accounting for one in 100 of the population, according to the research led by Oxford University experts.

This is more than double the 300,000 in France and ahead even of the upper estimate of 700,000 in Germany, which has the second-largest population of illegal migrants in Europe.

The figures were disclosed as the Home Office said 973 migrants in 17 small boats crossed the English Channel on Saturday, the biggest daily number this year.

The total number of people to cross in 2024 is 26,612, up five per cent on 2023 at the same stage, but 21 per cent behind the record 33,611 at this point in 2022.

Quite staggering considering we are an island off Europe. How is this even possible?

I'm sure it doesn't need saying, but I'm going to anyway:

To the one idiot,

Under no circumstances post anything on this forum regarding revelations.

it's like trying to find a seat on a packed train and all ending up standing up in the smoking carriage at the end.

BRANDED wrote: ↑07 Oct 2024, 06:50 Britain is home to more illegal migrants than any other European nation, a new study has found.

There are up to 745,000 illegal migrants in the UK, accounting for one in 100 of the population, according to the research led by Oxford University experts.

This is more than double the 300,000 in France and ahead even of the upper estimate of 700,000 in Germany, which has the second-largest population of illegal migrants in Europe.

The figures were disclosed as the Home Office said 973 migrants in 17 small boats crossed the English Channel on Saturday, the biggest daily number this year.

The total number of people to cross in 2024 is 26,612, up five per cent on 2023 at the same stage, but 21 per cent behind the record 33,611 at this point in 2022.

Losing your chief of staff would usually be considered a big revelation, mate. Were you expecting something more?

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑04 Oct 2024, 10:24 Watch out for big revelations in the Sundays.

Britain is home to more illegal migrants than any other European nation, a new study has found.

There are up to 745,000 illegal migrants in the UK, accounting for one in 100 of the population, according to the research led by Oxford University experts.

This is more than double the 300,000 in France and ahead even of the upper estimate of 700,000 in Germany, which has the second-largest population of illegal migrants in Europe.

The figures were disclosed as the Home Office said 973 migrants in 17 small boats crossed the English Channel on Saturday, the biggest daily number this year.

The total number of people to cross in 2024 is 26,612, up five per cent on 2023 at the same stage, but 21 per cent behind the record 33,611 at this point in 2022.

A super-injunction has closed down the gay stuff for a while, but 2TK's foot in mouth continues. Sue Gray goes. Her reward for failure? A made up sinecure on the same money.

Someone open the window please. There is an air of jilted-lover homoerotic frustration in here.

Well it's Sunday now. What is it or is this the usual tabloid desperate scrabbling around with "beergate" or "Starmer had a girlfriend in the 90s before he got married"  again?