AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 954
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 53 times
- Been liked: 182 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:35Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:33Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:22Come on then, what is it that you've "found", not "what do I sound like" (to you)?I found the video clip I was looking for. The one explaining the terms of the ECHR treaty. I thought you’d find it useful. It’s what’s currently being referenced to as a reason as to why we can’t deport these savages.
It’s kind of important.So at what point did I (that's me, that is, not you) mention the ECHR and "deporting savages"?
Sorry, I thought we were having a 2 way conversation.
You said that nothing would be achieved by the electorate. I simply gave you your example of Brexit and doubled down with Farage clips on ECHR and his plans on the ECHR referendum as an example of what will change.
Coming out of the ECHR removes the barriers currently being used as an excuse by the UK Gov’t as to why people have to live in fear for their kids and women.
If succesful I’d say that’s a big change and a big win for the people and another big loss for the state. Wouldn’t you?
You said that nothing would be achieved by the electorate. I simply gave you your example of Brexit and doubled down with Farage clips on ECHR and his plans on the ECHR referendum as an example of what will change.
Coming out of the ECHR removes the barriers currently being used as an excuse by the UK Gov’t as to why people have to live in fear for their kids and women.
If succesful I’d say that’s a big change and a big win for the people and another big loss for the state. Wouldn’t you?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4923
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 639 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:33Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:22Come on then, what is it that you've "found", not "what do I sound like" (to you)?I found the video clip I was looking for. The one explaining the terms of the ECHR treaty. I thought you’d find it useful. It’s what’s currently being referenced to as a reason as to why we can’t deport these savages.
It’s kind of important.
So at what point did I (that's me, that is, not you) mention the ECHR and "deporting savages"?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:22Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:18Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:05What, exactly, is it you've "found", and how does it relate to my claim that the state holds all the aces when it comes to actually running the country?You sound like a Democrat talking about the Deep state. I’ve heard it all before mate.
Come on then, what is it that you've "found", not "what do I sound like" (to you)?
I found the video clip I was looking for. The one explaining the terms of the ECHR treaty. I thought you’d find it useful. It’s what’s currently being referenced to as a reason as to why we can’t deport these savages.
It’s kind of important.
It’s kind of important.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:20Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:08Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:01Allow me to correct you.
Whatever flavour of government is in power, it is the state, not the government that actually implements the government's policies - but only if they approve; just look at the effort they put in to getting/trying to get Brexit overturned. They're still smarting like crazy from that one - how very dare the population have a say in how the state runs the country?
If the state (Be it the MoD, MoJ, Home Office, HMRC, etc.) decides to not play along, nothing happens.I disagree, Brexit proves the point. A referendum on the ECHR would be a second example.
Don’t underestimate the power of the people.
Brexit only got through because the people were pissed off with it dominating the headlines.
Boris Johnson caught that sentiment and got into power on the back of it, but even then the state was using every trick in the book - and then some - to try and thwart him; they came pretty close at times, too.
It wasn't "people power" that got Brexit over the line, it was simply a case of media fatigue - nobody wanted to hear about it 24/7 any more - either way.
I doubt that many those being asked to partake in a referendum for leaving the ECHR have the slightest clue as to what it does, so calling one would only create a tsunami of disinformation from both sides and, most probably a result not too dissimilar to the Brexit result and it's following state encouraged shenanigans.
Politicians are not the answer. Curbing the power of the state is.
Wasn’t it the people who voted for Brexit?
Kids are being raped en masse and women murdered and assaulted on a daily basis, I think people will be motivated to put an end to it. Especially parents and women.
According to you all we need is the same game plan of creating media fatigue to get a referendum on leaving the ECHR over line. Shouldn’t be too difficult.
I would think it would be an easy sell to the public. You could call it “Human rights for women and children” as a campaign.
You know Farage won’t back down.
So I disagree with you, completely! I see mass deportations in the future and the human rights of Brits brought to the forefront.
Britain first is long over due. Farage can expect the full backing of the USA too.
Kids are being raped en masse and women murdered and assaulted on a daily basis, I think people will be motivated to put an end to it. Especially parents and women.
According to you all we need is the same game plan of creating media fatigue to get a referendum on leaving the ECHR over line. Shouldn’t be too difficult.
I would think it would be an easy sell to the public. You could call it “Human rights for women and children” as a campaign.
You know Farage won’t back down.
So I disagree with you, completely! I see mass deportations in the future and the human rights of Brits brought to the forefront.
Britain first is long over due. Farage can expect the full backing of the USA too.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4923
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 639 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:18Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:05What, exactly, is it you've "found", and how does it relate to my claim that the state holds all the aces when it comes to actually running the country?You sound like a Democrat talking about the Deep state. I’ve heard it all before mate.
Come on then, what is it that you've "found", not "what do I sound like" (to you)?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4923
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 639 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:08Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:01Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:24Allow me to elaborate:
UK politics is made up of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Bank of England sets monetary policy
autonomously. The Fabian society is not without its influence.
US politics is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Federal Reserve sets monetary policy autonomously. The Deep state is not without its influence.
Both have 3 branches of Gov’t.
If Donald Trump can come in and secure our borders and send Ice agents out in the streets to round up illegals then so can Farage.
And if you are gonna pipe up about the ECHR, you couldn’t ask for a more aggressive anti European entity than Farage.
There is a video of Farage explaining that the ECHR law that was passed clearly states that the UK maintains its sovereignty and control of its laws in this bill as written.Allow me to correct you.
Whatever flavour of government is in power, it is the state, not the government that actually implements the government's policies - but only if they approve; just look at the effort they put in to getting/trying to get Brexit overturned. They're still smarting like crazy from that one - how very dare the population have a say in how the state runs the country?
If the state (Be it the MoD, MoJ, Home Office, HMRC, etc.) decides to not play along, nothing happens.I disagree, Brexit proves the point. A referendum on the ECHR would be a second example.
Don’t underestimate the power of the people.
Brexit only got through because the people were pissed off with it dominating the headlines.
Boris Johnson caught that sentiment and got into power on the back of it, but even then the state was using every trick in the book - and then some - to try and thwart him; they came pretty close at times, too.
It wasn't "people power" that got Brexit over the line, it was simply a case of media fatigue - nobody wanted to hear about it 24/7 any more - either way.
I doubt that many those being asked to partake in a referendum for leaving the ECHR have the slightest clue as to what it does, so calling one would only create a tsunami of disinformation from both sides and, most probably a result not too dissimilar to the Brexit result and it's following state encouraged shenanigans.
Politicians are not the answer. Curbing the power of the state is.
Boris Johnson caught that sentiment and got into power on the back of it, but even then the state was using every trick in the book - and then some - to try and thwart him; they came pretty close at times, too.
It wasn't "people power" that got Brexit over the line, it was simply a case of media fatigue - nobody wanted to hear about it 24/7 any more - either way.
I doubt that many those being asked to partake in a referendum for leaving the ECHR have the slightest clue as to what it does, so calling one would only create a tsunami of disinformation from both sides and, most probably a result not too dissimilar to the Brexit result and it's following state encouraged shenanigans.
Politicians are not the answer. Curbing the power of the state is.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:05What, exactly, is it you've "found", and how does it relate to my claim that the state holds all the aces when it comes to actually running the country?
You sound like a Democrat talking about the Deep state. I’ve heard it all before mate.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 18:01Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:24Allow me to elaborate:
UK politics is made up of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Bank of England sets monetary policy
autonomously. The Fabian society is not without its influence.
US politics is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Federal Reserve sets monetary policy autonomously. The Deep state is not without its influence.
Both have 3 branches of Gov’t.
If Donald Trump can come in and secure our borders and send Ice agents out in the streets to round up illegals then so can Farage.
And if you are gonna pipe up about the ECHR, you couldn’t ask for a more aggressive anti European entity than Farage.
There is a video of Farage explaining that the ECHR law that was passed clearly states that the UK maintains its sovereignty and control of its laws in this bill as written.Allow me to correct you.
Whatever flavour of government is in power, it is the state, not the government that actually implements the government's policies - but only if they approve; just look at the effort they put in to getting/trying to get Brexit overturned. They're still smarting like crazy from that one - how very dare the population have a say in how the state runs the country?
If the state (Be it the MoD, MoJ, Home Office, HMRC, etc.) decides to not play along, nothing happens.
I disagree, Brexit proves the point. A referendum on the ECHR would be a second example.
Don’t underestimate the power of the people.
Don’t underestimate the power of the people.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4923
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 639 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
What, exactly, is it you've "found", and how does it relate to my claim that the state holds all the aces when it comes to actually running the country?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4923
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 639 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:24Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:05Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:02Then you clearly have no concept of the power and influence the state running the UK has accumulated over the last 50 years.You obviously have little regard for the power of the people. Didn’t have you pegged as a defeatist.Allow me to elaborate:
UK politics is made up of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Bank of England sets monetary policy
autonomously. The Fabian society is not without its influence.
US politics is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Federal Reserve sets monetary policy autonomously. The Deep state is not without its influence.
Both have 3 branches of Gov’t.
If Donald Trump can come in and secure our borders and send Ice agents out in the streets to round up illegals then so can Farage.
And if you are gonna pipe up about the ECHR, you couldn’t ask for a more aggressive anti European entity than Farage.
There is a video of Farage explaining that the ECHR law that was passed clearly states that the UK maintains its sovereignty and control of its laws in this bill as written.
Allow me to correct you.
Whatever flavour of government is in power, it is the state, not the government that actually implements the government's policies - but only if they approve; just look at the effort they put in to getting/trying to get Brexit overturned. They're still smarting like crazy from that one - how very dare the population have a say in how the state runs the country?
If the state (Be it the MoD, MoJ, Home Office, HMRC, etc.) decides to not play along, nothing happens.
Whatever flavour of government is in power, it is the state, not the government that actually implements the government's policies - but only if they approve; just look at the effort they put in to getting/trying to get Brexit overturned. They're still smarting like crazy from that one - how very dare the population have a say in how the state runs the country?
If the state (Be it the MoD, MoJ, Home Office, HMRC, etc.) decides to not play along, nothing happens.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I think I addressed that about an hour ago. Zzzzzzzzzzz!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Congrats on not being able to tell the difference between illegal immigrants and British citizens via birth.
bravo.
bravo.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2321
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 545 times
- Been liked: 795 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I skip past the on line love affair between goose and nutsin most days as it is dull, juvenile and ridiculous.
However, the absolute TENACITY on display in not giving a millimeter is to be admired.
Them guns are being stuck to!
However, the absolute TENACITY on display in not giving a millimeter is to be admired.
Them guns are being stuck to!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Wrong again.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:05Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:02Then you clearly have no concept of the power and influence the state running the UK has accumulated over the last 50 years.You obviously have little regard for the power of the people. Didn’t have you pegged as a defeatist.
Allow me to elaborate:
UK politics is made up of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Bank of England sets monetary policy
autonomously. The Fabian society is not without its influence.
US politics is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Federal Reserve sets monetary policy autonomously. The Deep state is not without its influence.
Both have 3 branches of Gov’t.
If Donald Trump can come in and secure our borders and send Ice agents out in the streets to round up illegals then so can Farage.
And if you are gonna pipe up about the ECHR, you couldn’t ask for a more aggressive anti European entity than Farage.
There is a video of Farage explaining that the ECHR law that was passed clearly states that the UK maintains its sovereignty and control of its laws in this bill as written.
UK politics is made up of the House of Commons and House of Lords. Bank of England sets monetary policy
autonomously. The Fabian society is not without its influence.
US politics is made up of the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Federal Reserve sets monetary policy autonomously. The Deep state is not without its influence.
Both have 3 branches of Gov’t.
If Donald Trump can come in and secure our borders and send Ice agents out in the streets to round up illegals then so can Farage.
And if you are gonna pipe up about the ECHR, you couldn’t ask for a more aggressive anti European entity than Farage.
There is a video of Farage explaining that the ECHR law that was passed clearly states that the UK maintains its sovereignty and control of its laws in this bill as written.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:03Just what I thought you have nothing!
guess that makes two of us.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 17:02Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:53Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:44"A landslide Reform victory in the next election that’ll go a long way to fixing a lot of it."
Absolute balderdash. The state will never allow Reform to introduce a single one of it's policies.
If you don't understand that simple fact, you don't understand British politics.I completely disagree with you! There will be change. You’ll see!Then you clearly have no concept of the power and influence the state running the UK has accumulated over the last 50 years.
You obviously have little regard for the power of the people. Didn’t have you pegged as a defeatist.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Just what I thought you have nothing!
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4923
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 37 times
- Been liked: 639 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:53Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:44Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:26A landslide Reform victory in the next election that’ll go a long way to fixing a lot of it.
I’m concerned yes, very concerned for the kids and the women. There’s a real problem there. Not ashamed to admit it, every life lost or ruined is an unnecessary travesty.
But once again you don’t have any concern for the victims. You told us you don’t like animals, how about women and children do you not like them too!"A landslide Reform victory in the next election that’ll go a long way to fixing a lot of it."
Absolute balderdash. The state will never allow Reform to introduce a single one of it's policies.
If you don't understand that simple fact, you don't understand British politics.I completely disagree with you! There will be change. You’ll see!
Then you clearly have no concept of the power and influence the state running the UK has accumulated over the last 50 years.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I can read something which doesn't solve the problem. Nowhere have reform said they will deport british citizens by birth.
You may as well say you're waiting for Mickey Mouse to get elected because its about as relevant.
You may as well say you're waiting for Mickey Mouse to get elected because its about as relevant.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I already told you, can’t you read?
Now what’s your solution?
Now what’s your solution?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:52goose wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:29Nutsin wrote: ↑13 Nov 2025, 16:26A landslide Reform victory in the next election that’ll go a long way to fixing a lot of it.
I’m concerned yes, very concerned for the kids and the women. There’s a real problem there. Not ashamed to admit it, every life lost or ruined is an unnecessary travesty.
But once again you don’t have any concern for the victims. You told us you don’t like animals, how about women and children do you not like them too!When have said anything other than punishment for anyone committing those crimes?
Reform won't be deporting british citizens so thats not going to fix your problem. Try again.Just out of curiosity, what is your solution? Or don’t you have one?
so you dont know how to fix it?