West Ham Online

Her Pakistani father and step-mother have been found guilty of her murder today. They get sentenced on Tuesday.

This is one of the sickest crimes in recent years. There really should be retributive justice in these cases (i.e. the state to inflict brutal pain and punishment upon the perpetrators).

Two years of sick abuse they subjected that poor girl to before murdering her, all under the noses of social services. What a sick and fucked up country the UK has become.

Read that the father came to the UK to 'study' and married the girl's Eastern European mother in 2009. The guy went on to have six children. This kind of thing is happening up and down the country, with Mohammed now officially the top boys name at birth in the UK.

Somewhat unsurprisingly, this thread is descending into a mud-slinging, insult laden shit fest. 

For that reason it's locked and shut down.  How depressingly predictable.

It has also gone hopelessly off topic and is no longer discussing the case the originating topic was about.

You had your arse handed to you, prick. And now you’re trying a feeble bait-and-bluster trick. 

It’s all there in the thread.
 

So that's a no, you won't answer it, then. Caught yourself out in your load of old bollocks posting, I see.

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 13:13

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 13:11

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 12:50

Fair's fair. Offer it to all inmates serving 5 years or more. How about starting with this one -
 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c878p3l93rqo

 

I'd have offered it to the nonces first but I understand why you didn't...

Nice bit of "look a squirrel" posting. Come on, would you like it made law that someone who tried to set fire to some asylum seekers should be encouraged and offered assistance to top himself, or not?

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 13:11

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 12:50

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 08:51

I'm sure Whitehall could cost it pretty quickly. Some of the shortfall could also be diverted from reduced prison costs (offering assisted death to all foreign inmates serving 5 years or more ). Reductions in new arrivals would reduce asylum processing costs which would also help fund it. The 8 millions a day luxury hotel bill etc. In fact the overall net cost would likely be negligible or even return a surplus.

Fair's fair. Offer it to all inmates serving 5 years or more. How about starting with this one -
 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c878p3l93rqo

 

I'd have offered it to the nonces first but I understand why you didn't...

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 12:50

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 08:51

 

I'm sure Whitehall could cost it pretty quickly. Some of the shortfall could also be diverted from reduced prison costs (offering assisted death to all foreign inmates serving 5 years or more ). Reductions in new arrivals would reduce asylum processing costs which would also help fund it. The 8 millions a day luxury hotel bill etc. In fact the overall net cost would likely be negligible or even return a surplus.

Fair's fair. Offer it to all inmates serving 5 years or more. How about starting with this one -
 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c878p3l93rqo

 

One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 12:50

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 08:51

 

I'm sure Whitehall could cost it pretty quickly. Some of the shortfall could also be diverted from reduced prison costs (offering assisted death to all foreign inmates serving 5 years or more ). Reductions in new arrivals would reduce asylum processing costs which would also help fund it. The 8 millions a day luxury hotel bill etc. In fact the overall net cost would likely be negligible or even return a surplus.

Fair's fair. Offer it to all inmates serving 5 years or more. How about starting with this one -
 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c878p3l93rqo

Don't see anybody here suggesting bias in the implementation of their proposals.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 08:51

 

I'm sure Whitehall could cost it pretty quickly. Some of the shortfall could also be diverted from reduced prison costs (offering assisted death to all foreign inmates serving 5 years or more ). Reductions in new arrivals would reduce asylum processing costs which would also help fund it. The 8 millions a day luxury hotel bill etc. In fact the overall net cost would likely be negligible or even return a surplus.

How long does it take to train enough social workers to meet the demand of such services to deal with cases such as this in the UK?

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 12:16 Yep - got you bang to rights. Ta rah twat.

Yep - got you bang to rights. Ta rah twat.

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 12:05

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 11:59 Your tactic? You total clown. You took bait so absurd that only a handful of the most deranged liberals (but definitely you )  wouldn't see the hook, then ignored everything that was problematic with it and argued it would be too expensive and only benefit financial the 1%.

You're a pseudo-intellectual mess as well as a bit of a nazi.

No, to take your pathetic bate I would have had to agree with what I described as a total abortion of a policy on principle but then merely question it on cost. What I did was focus on the aspect that would most clearly illustrate its utterly corrupt nature. As for you, I’ll think twice before I attempt to engage with the deliberately disingenuous political invertebrate you have just shown yourself up to be. I guess you reckon yourself as some sort of a Labour Party activist.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 11:59 Your tactic? You total clown. You took bait so absurd that only a handful of the most deranged liberals (but definitely you )  wouldn't see the hook, then ignored everything that was problematic with it and argued it would be too expensive and only benefit financial the 1%.

You're a pseudo-intellectual mess as well as a bit of a nazi.

Your tactic? You total clown. You took bait so absurd that only a handful of the most deranged liberals (but definitely you )  wouldn't see the hook, then ignored everything that was problematic with it and argued it would be too expensive and only benefit financial the 1%.

You're a pseudo-intellectual mess as well as a bit of a nazi.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 11:28

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 10:06 Just answer the basic question your own abortion of a policy proposal throws up. Or can’t you even take responsibility for that? 

I'm more interested how you can argue costs before you address the idea that a government could intern, what would be millions of people ( of colour) without cause, seize their assets and forcibly deported them. Makes you sound a bit of a nazi to be honest.

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 10:06 Just answer the basic question your own abortion of a policy proposal throws up. Or can’t you even take responsibility for that? 

Vexed

ag ag ag

Pickled's replies are like a badly programmed AI response most of the time.

violator wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 10:45

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 10:06 Just answer the basic question your own abortion of a policy proposal throws up. Or can’t you even take responsibility for that? 

Pickle asking someone to "just answer the basic question"...ag ag ag

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 10:06 Just answer the basic question your own abortion of a policy proposal throws up. Or can’t you even take responsibility for that? 

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑11 Dec 2024, 23:20

Vexed wrote: ↑11 Dec 2024, 18:56 COYI is the product of hamster rape perpetrated by a tramp called Mohammed. This is the only way to explain the mental block this poor little amoeba is experiencing. Have a heart and give a couple of quid to cunts like this at Christmas rather than reminding him what a hopeless unloved creature he and his entire bloodline are. 

I know your  sort only to well.
A  gob shite  jack cսnt who lets his oppo dig  the shellscrape.
When it comes on top ...on his fuckin toes

Just answer the basic question your own abortion of a policy proposal throws up. Or can’t you even take responsibility for that? 

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:42

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:20

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:12

I’m sorry, but are you still advocating this as policy? You’re doing an absolute hatched job on it!

Did you mean a hatchet job (which, btw means "a false accusation of an offense or malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions" ) you buffoon?

 

Yes. Thanks for picking up on my typo as well. Which public school boy clique do you expect will benefit most from said outsourced application-handling contracts? Apart from the Israelis of course.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:20

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:12

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑12 Dec 2024, 09:09

Whitehall can cost it. Obviously application would be outscorced to private contractors as is the norm for this type of thing. Bound to be an Israeli venture capital fund that would be all over this.

I’m sorry, but are you still advocating this as policy? You’re doing an absolute hatched job on it!

Did you mean a hatchet job (which, btw means "a false accusation of an offense or malicious misrepresentation of someone's words or actions" ) you buffoon?