Page 1 of 1
Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 11:08
by LeroysBoots
Would not be surprised at all that Dan Ashworth has been lined up by Brady to replace Steidten.
Potter and Ashworth worked together at Brighton
Ashworth is a free agent since leave the Mancs
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 09 Jan 2025, 21:41
by Full Claret Jacket
Hermit Road" wrote: ↑09 Jan 2025, 08:07
Kilman at £40 million is mind bogglingly stupid.
That has to have been Lopetugui putting his foot though surely, that’s what I assumed with their background as manager and captain at Wolves.
Club backed their manager who wanted him. Same as he wanted Guido Rodriguez who was actually probably a worthwhile gamble on a signing on fee.
We did overpay for Kilman by about 20 mil so we need to work with him to get better from him (he is still only 27) . He's not the worst player we've had but currently not the answer to our frail defense and his positioning and reading of the game leave a lot to be desired at times. Lost count of how many times he's played someone onside for a goal.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 09 Jan 2025, 08:10
by John Coffey
Hermit Road" wrote: ↑09 Jan 2025, 08:07
Kilman at £40 million is mind bogglingly stupid.
That has to have been Lopetugui putting his foot though surely, that’s what I assumed with their background as manager and captain at Wolves.
No other explanation.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 09 Jan 2025, 08:07
by Hermit Road
Kilman at £40 million is mind bogglingly stupid.
That has to have been Lopetugui putting his foot though surely, that’s what I assumed with their background as manager and captain at Wolves.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 09 Jan 2025, 05:09
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Manuel wrote: ↑09 Jan 2025, 04:46
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 16:19
honky cat" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 13:38
I know he is a grubby little dildo man but didn't he bring in the 2 best signings this summer, AWB and Summerville. Maybe he should be left to it?
Yep and it was the so-called expert (dago cսnt) who insisted on spunking £40m on Kilman, and signing the disastrous Guido.
But let's all feel sorry for him! 40 mil on Kilman will be the cunts legacy.
BRADY FC.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 09 Jan 2025, 04:46
by Manuel
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 16:19
honky cat" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 13:38
I know he is a grubby little dildo man but didn't he bring in the 2 best signings this summer, AWB and Summerville. Maybe he should be left to it?
Yep and it was the so-called expert (dago cսnt) who insisted on spunking £40m on Kilman, and signing the disastrous Guido.
But let's all feel sorry for him! 40 mil on Kilman will be the cunts legacy.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 16:19
by Mad Ferret
honky cat" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 13:38
I know he is a grubby little dildo man but didn't he bring in the 2 best signings this summer, AWB and Summerville. Maybe he should be left to it?
Yep and it was the so-called expert (dago cսnt) who insisted on spunking £40m on Kilman, and signing the disastrous Guido.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 15:07
by RBshorty
Ashworth does Brady's job not Seitden. So it would be a surprised if that would happen. Unless her Ladyship is taking a backseat. (There's a pun in there somewhere.!) On top of dealing with The Glorious Leader.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 13:45
by El Scorchio
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 13:41
Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 13:30
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 11:47
OK. Let me put it another way:
Maybe his rancid mates lent him the readies to buy the club in the first case and are refusing to let him pay any such debts off under threat of exposing something highly nefarious.
They now have the gift that keeps on giving.
What do you know?
I know nothing about the transfer strategy at West Ham, but there has to be a reason for Sullivan repeating the same failing tactics time & time again but expecting a different (i.e. successful) outcome each time.
Yeah- he's an idiot who thinks he knows better than all the football experts he has employed, who is too interested in (or sweet talked into) listening to and consequently lining his rancid mates' (and probably his own to an extent) pockets at the expense of building any kind of structure or coherent strategy at the club.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 13:41
by Mike Oxsaw
Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 13:30
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 11:47
OK. Let me put it another way:
Maybe his rancid mates lent him the readies to buy the club in the first case and are refusing to let him pay any such debts off under threat of exposing something highly nefarious.
They now have the gift that keeps on giving.
What do you know?
I know nothing about the transfer strategy at West Ham, but there has to be a reason for Sullivan repeating the same failing tactics time & time again but expecting a different (i.e. successful) outcome each time.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 13:38
by honky cat
I know he is a grubby little dildo man but didn't he bring in the 2 best signings this summer, AWB and Summerville. Maybe he should be left to it?
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 13:30
by Pub Bigot
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 11:47
OK. Let me put it another way:
Maybe his rancid mates lent him the readies to buy the club in the first case and are refusing to let him pay any such debts off under threat of exposing something highly nefarious.
They now have the gift that keeps on giving.
What do you know?
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 12:18
by El Scorchio
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 11:47
OK. Let me put it another way:
Maybe his rancid mates lent him the readies to buy the club in the first case and are refusing to let him pay any such debts off under threat of exposing something highly nefarious.
They now have the gift that keeps on giving.
I love that. Well purely in terms of intrigue rather than the horrific ongoing ramifications for the club.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 11:47
by Mike Oxsaw
OK. Let me put it another way:
Maybe his rancid mates lent him the readies to buy the club in the first case and are refusing to let him pay any such debts off under threat of exposing something highly nefarious.
They now have the gift that keeps on giving.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 11:28
by El Scorchio
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 11:20
After all this time under-achieving in the PL since he bought the club, there must be a very compelling case for him to trust his rancid old mates (
) over the football experts he employs.
Yeah but the problem is that he habitually goes with what his rancid old mates say over what his staff say. So surely a compelling case to just stop fucking doing that. After all, that process is what landed us with the current manager and god knows what else.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 11:20
by Mike Oxsaw
After all this time under-achieving in the PL since he bought the club, there must be a very compelling case for him to trust his rancid old mates (
) over the football experts he employs.
Re: Dan Ashworth
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 11:12
by El Scorchio
Bit fucking weird what went on with him at Man U. What was all that about?
End of the day though, whether it's Stiedten, Lop, Potter, Ashworth is all worth fuck all if Sullivan can't just leave them to fully do the job they've been employed to do without sticking his grubby little fingers in when he chooses, overriding any deals he doesn't fancy or pushing players of his and his preferred agents choice onto his staff.
Just. Fucking. Trust. Your. Experts. And. Not. Your. Rancid. Old. Mates.
