The question should be that if you've got kids/grandkids of that age, do you want a society in which malodorous perverts such as this are allowed to flourish?
The authorities (and/or individuals within) should be held to account over this - it is they, and only they, that allowed society to move in this direction.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 19:38
by happygilmore
52 years is enough
IF ..he lives for the 52 yrs and is tortured and suffers excruciating pain every single day.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 18:34
by Mad Dog
Killing 3 young girls and attempting to kill more?
Or to put in another way, the calculated assassination of 3 children
No 52 years isn't enough.
Hopefully it won't matter and they'll get to the cսnt
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 16:41
by One Sunny Day
No, 52 years isn't enough but I seriously doubt he'll ever be released, so I'm not worrying about it. cսnt is locked away for life so can never murder little kids again.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:59
by THUNDERCLINT
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 08:43
Some people are just born evil. Did you see that picture of him? It looked like something Stephen King might have wrote about.
Born evil or not people knew what this creature was all about, especially it's parents. In the US they've prosecuted a parent for purchasing the firearm used by a school shooter, there's negligence or culpability here on the part of the parents that needs investigation and most likely criminal charges.
If the races were reversed here we all know Kweer Starmer would be bringing the exhumed bones of the great-great grandparents for questioning and spining far right fairytales.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:58
by Far Cough UKunt
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 08:55
For goodness sake, Cough. Even Stevie Wonder's seen that bloody photo.
Nursey:
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:55
by Nurse Ratched
For goodness sake, Cough. Even Stevie Wonder's seen that bloody photo.
I don't disagree that some people are born evil. I'm not arguing with that idea at all.
I am taking exception to the idea that there is nothing his parents could have done to restrict his activities while he was a minor still living under their roof. He was still their responsibility aĺl the time he was cooking up ricin, buying weapons on the Internet, looking at stuff on the dark web, buying terrorist manuals, attacking the kids at hs school, engaging in a litany of violent and antisocial behaviour. They didn't do enough. They were shit parents. They share the blame.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:43
by Far Cough UKunt
Some people are just born evil. Did you see that picture of him? It looked like something Stephen King might have wrote about.
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 08:18
Oh, and money. Where did the money come from to pay for his weapons, etc? Let's not dwell on how a 17 year old boy gets to spend money on stuff like that with nobody intervening.
Tips from his choir singing?
Ha! Who knows? But hey, it's not the job of 'Miyagi of Kigali' to monitor and intervene on ALL of his 17 year old son's murderous intentions. He dragged him out of a cab. He's done his bit.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:21
by Lee Trundle
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 08:18
Oh, and money. Where did the money come from to pay for his weapons, etc? Let's not dwell on how a 17 year old boy gets to spend money on stuff like that with nobody intervening.
Tips from his choir singing?
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:18
by Nurse Ratched
Oh, and money. Where did the money come from to pay for his weapons, etc? Let's not dwell on how a 17 year old boy gets to spend money on stuff like that with nobody intervening.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 08:03
by Nurse Ratched
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 07:48
And the parents knew what he was capable of so why they're in protective custody instead of on remand is a question the government need to answer.
Apparently his sainted father pulled him out of a cab when his ugly slug son was trying to go to his old school to commit a massacre. Nowhere is it reported that the father brought this incident to the authorities' attention, but still. And I'm sure that the parents, who, looking over 18, would have had to sign for the receipt of those knives, were just busy or something, so forgot to ask the slug why age-restricted packages were coming to their home and what was in them. I'm sure there's also a very good reason why salt-of-the-earth-church-going ma and pa failed to question the cooking up of ricin in their kitchen. Or the stockpiled knives and arrows in his room. Gotta give a teenage boy his privacy. It's a bit draconian to refuse a teenager private access to his own computer or smartphone, even if he has shown a strong past history of violence and psychopathic behaviour. So let's not prevent or closely monitor his Internet use, either. Let's blame Amazon and THE AUTHORITIES.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 07:48
by THUNDERCLINT
And the parents knew what he was capable of so why they're in protective custody instead of on remand is a question the government need to answer.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 07:45
by THUNDERCLINT
It's too long. The general public has now got to pay to feed, clothe and shelter this savage for at least 52 years at which point it will either be detained in jail or paroled and in both scenarios will still have to pay to feed, clothe and shelter it.
It's of no benefit to society to prolong it's existence on this Earth..
The death penalty needs to be returned immediately.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 05:50
by Chip Shop Charlie
Personally I'd like to see him 'crucified' maybe sounds inhumane but fits his crimes.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 03:31
by Monsieur merde de cheval
The shithouse will be do a few months down the block where he's been ...then sectioned and quietly sent packing to BROADMOOR or RAMPTON.
for the establishments sake ...not his .
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 20:11
It wasn't The System's job to raise him.
Yeah, let's string up Jon Venables parents whilst we're at it.
Some cunts are just born wrong, their brain wired incorrectly. Fuck all to do with their upbringing.
And for clarity, NO, I'm not defending the sick cսnt.
I'm sorry mate ..but I'm not having that.
As soon as the details of this horrific slaughter broke in the media..WE ALL KNEW THE PROFILE .
WE DONT DO BARBARIC SAVAGERY.
THATS WHY WE KNEW.
DAVID AMISS
MANCHESTER ARENA
BOROUGH MARKET
WESTMINSTER BRIDGE
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 01:10
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Gank wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 00:34
He won’t make Christmas
Hes protected by the peaceful brotherhood ...for now
but we have time on our side ..it only takes one second of one day to get served up good and proper...
Unfortunately I fink he'll top himself ...like the coward weasel he is.
All I know is ..tonight ...I feel a lot emotions...none good.
bewilderment at how and why our once great islands has come to this.
But my overriding emotion tonight is just a gut wrenching sadness
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 24 Jan 2025, 00:34
by Gank
He won’t make Christmas
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 23 Jan 2025, 22:40
by zebthecat
He'll never get out.
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 23 Jan 2025, 21:36
by Pi Alpha Nu
He'd probably get done in jail hopefully or will get such a hard time he'll end up topping himself.
the dad stopped him going to his school to stab people, why wasn’t anything done then?
Re: is 52 years long enough?
Posted: 23 Jan 2025, 20:53
by MaryMillingtonsGhost
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2025, 20:11
It wasn't The System's job to raise him.
Yeah, let's string up Jon Venables parents whilst we're at it.
Some cunts are just born wrong, their brain wired incorrectly. Fuck all to do with their upbringing.
And for clarity, NO, I'm not defending the sick cսnt.
