WHO slurps
Posted: 25 Jun 2025, 18:29
Swiss. wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 15:58Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 10:27 Grown-up's playground, grown-up's rules.
Rocket science it isn't.
On something I agree with you on.
dumb ass ....
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
WHO slurps
Page 1 of 3
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 05 Jul 2025, 05:39
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 05 Jul 2025, 05:04
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 13:51Obviously not as smart as Swiss, as assumed you were the reincarnation of NormanNoMates.
Unless..........
I was millhoose officer
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 03 Jul 2025, 14:38
No they weren't, Stop lying. Is this really the only story you have as it seems you are obsessed with it. That and the fact you seemed to be paying so much attention to me shows how sad you are.
Get back on your meds.
Get back on your meds.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 16:12
You're one of lifes losers , but if you feel it makes a difference lying about how you interacted with people for your own self esteem, crack on.
Those who were there, were laughing at you.
Those who were there, were laughing at you.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 15:58
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025, 10:27 Grown-up's playground, grown-up's rules.
Rocket science it isn't.
On something I agree with you on.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 15:57
Not true you dumb ass. It was my first slurps and I was getting know people and there wasn't a corner as you put it as we were outside. You were also not at the other 2 at which I spoke to loads of people as posters will confirm.
So take you rotten, ugly, dumb big depressed head off this forum because you know you can't take it.
So take you rotten, ugly, dumb big depressed head off this forum because you know you can't take it.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 15:53
aye aye
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 15:51
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 15:48
Headbutting a bird wasn't a fine moment on the WHO slurps.
And ark at Swiss thinking he was heavily involved in it all, the prick stood on his own saying fuck all!
And ark at Swiss thinking he was heavily involved in it all, the prick stood on his own saying fuck all!
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 11:43
"He who has not sinned cast the first stone"
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 10:27
Grown-up's playground, grown-up's rules.
Rocket science it isn't.
Rocket science it isn't.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 09:59
Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 09:46(He was on Easy Paul at the time, he had to change regularly)
Easy Paul wasn't a Millhouse account. I think that's what you're suggesting there.
The beauty for me was the video that was put together afterwards to 'Creep' by Radiohead. Absolute gold that was.
The beauty for me was the video that was put together afterwards to 'Creep' by Radiohead. Absolute gold that was.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 02 Jul 2025, 01:06
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 13:45 It's not a crime* for a man to want to get his leg over. It's what men have been trying to do since the dawn of man. It's the biological imperative. 'Sliding into DMs', to use a ghastly modern phrase, is just the current version of sidling up to a woman in the pub and trying to chat her up. Men are either good at that or they're not. They can try their luck with high quality/attractive women, fail, and eventually either change their approach or find their level. This is how it's supposed to work. The market decides.
Have we now become so 'enlightened' (de-dicked) that only attractive and charismatic men are allowed to approach women? There's a lid for every pot and all that.
We're used to hearing ball-breaking feminists parroting the line that all/most men are perverts/potential rapists, but it's sad to hear centrist dads taking that view.
*yet.
I respect you trying to see the nice in people but Milly really is a danger to women, far more than you realise. The full transcript of his messages with "Julia" went beyond white lies to try and get his leg over.
Oh, and to end the speculation, Millhouse is definitely leavemyarsealona, right now.
Oh, and to end the speculation, Millhouse is definitely leavemyarsealona, right now.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 16:51
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 13:45
We're used to hearing ball-breaking feminists parroting the line that all/most men are perverts/potential rapists
Many of them sound like they're harbouring on here the way conversations flow at times. 
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 16:47
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 16:42
I went to 3 . O'Neil's Mansion House, Then The Old Bank of England and lastly The Railway Pub , Liverpool Street.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 14:18
Only met you once CS, when Millwall were playing us in an early kick off, we were in the George pub in Wanstead.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 14:16
I remember going to a WHO drinks back in 1999 in the city, can't believe how long ago that was. My son had just been born.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 13:51
Unless..........
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 13:49
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 13:45 'Sliding into DMs', to use a ghastly modern phrase, is just the current version of sidling up to a woman in the pub and trying to chat her up
You have WHOmail, Nurse.
*unzips*
*unzips*
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 13:45
It's not a crime* for a man to want to get his leg over. It's what men have been trying to do since the dawn of man. It's the biological imperative. 'Sliding into DMs', to use a ghastly modern phrase, is just the current version of sidling up to a woman in the pub and trying to chat her up. Men are either good at that or they're not. They can try their luck with high quality/attractive women, fail, and eventually either change their approach or find their level. This is how it's supposed to work. The market decides.
Have we now become so 'enlightened' (de-dicked) that only attractive and charismatic men are allowed to approach women? There's a lid for every pot and all that.
We're used to hearing ball-breaking feminists parroting the line that all/most men are perverts/potential rapists, but it's sad to hear centrist dads taking that view.
*yet.
Have we now become so 'enlightened' (de-dicked) that only attractive and charismatic men are allowed to approach women? There's a lid for every pot and all that.
We're used to hearing ball-breaking feminists parroting the line that all/most men are perverts/potential rapists, but it's sad to hear centrist dads taking that view.
*yet.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 13:25
Well I respect all three of you, but I entirely disagree with you on this matter.
If this incel before it was invented slithered into your Sister/Daughter/Niece/Grand Daughters DMs now like he did then you would soon change your tune.
And with that I am out. Already allowed myself to be drawn on the subject much more than I wanted to.
It's a weakness of mine.
If this incel before it was invented slithered into your Sister/Daughter/Niece/Grand Daughters DMs now like he did then you would soon change your tune.
And with that I am out. Already allowed myself to be drawn on the subject much more than I wanted to.
It's a weakness of mine.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 13:08
Moncurs Putting Iron" wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025, 12:52 Thanks Nurse, honest and erudite as always.
I have to say in the proceeding months a large part of me hoped for a redemption story from it for Millhouse and I know for a fact that others who attended that slurps felt the same.
Unfortunately whether it was due to the sheer scale of the set up or the character flaws of the mark this was not meant to be.
As you have quite rightly pointed out the humour and pisstakes were always with a glint in the eye and a SWT implied, perhaps that was the beginning of the end of that.
I feel this detracts from the fun that was Slurps. The thing I took from it was having a mental image of people and then either having it verified or completely blown out of the water.
Where is Johnson these days? IS he too embarrassed to come on nhere after his namesake and hero eneded up being a total incompetent, lying baffoon. He was one of the architects. I actually think it was a bad thing to do to a fellow hammer. Also the people who did it are sad cases with too much time on their hands, Should get a life.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 12:59
Largely down to the muse that.
Re: WHO slurps
Posted: 01 Jul 2025, 12:52
Thanks Nurse, honest and erudite as always.
I have to say in the proceeding months a large part of me hoped for a redemption story from it for Millhouse and I know for a fact that others who attended that slurps felt the same.
Unfortunately whether it was due to the sheer scale of the set up or the character flaws of the mark this was not meant to be.
As you have quite rightly pointed out the humour and pisstakes were always with a glint in the eye and a SWT implied, perhaps that was the beginning of the end of that.
I feel this detracts from the fun that was Slurps. The thing I took from it was having a mental image of people and then either having it verified or completely blown out of the water.
I have to say in the proceeding months a large part of me hoped for a redemption story from it for Millhouse and I know for a fact that others who attended that slurps felt the same.
Unfortunately whether it was due to the sheer scale of the set up or the character flaws of the mark this was not meant to be.
As you have quite rightly pointed out the humour and pisstakes were always with a glint in the eye and a SWT implied, perhaps that was the beginning of the end of that.
I feel this detracts from the fun that was Slurps. The thing I took from it was having a mental image of people and then either having it verified or completely blown out of the water.