West Ham Online

It IS a complete dog's breakfast of an act which will protect absolutely no one.

The intentions are admirable but the implementation is the equivalent of trying to run an electric car on lumps of coal.

It's the IT equivalent of HS2: poorly defined requirements, inadequately researched problems/potential solutions and every "interested" party pulling it every which way.

The best that can be said of it is that it's the digital equivalent of putting jazz mags on the top shelf of a newsagent - and I'm sure, despite that restriction, every 100% straight person (on here, at least) saw a porno mag before they were legally entitled to.

But, hey! You just freely hand over all and any information you're asked for; I'm sure there a few hundred Nigerians waiting for Mr. Stupid to freely pass over the last bit of the jigsaw to complete their profile of him.

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:45

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:42

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:32

Dry your eyes you ginger nonce

Scouse loving soap dodging Eyetie 

 

underage cambodian noncing ginger div.
(note the word "again")

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:42

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:32

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:28

 

You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 

Dry your eyes you ginger nonce

Scouse loving soap dodging Eyetie 

 

Happy Friday everyone!

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:40

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:35

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:26

Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?

Projection; when someone attributes their thoughts, feelings or behaviours on to another person.

Braindead ThickClit 

 

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:32

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:28

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:20

reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.

 

You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 

Dry your eyes you ginger nonce

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:35

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:26

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:18

It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.

Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?

Projection; when someone attributes their thoughts, feelings or behaviours on to another person.

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:26

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:18

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 14:04 I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to

It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.

Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?

, wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:27 For millions and millions of us this online safety act is making no difference to our daily use so what’s the fuss?

 

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:28

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:20

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:14

Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom

reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.

 

You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:20

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:14

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 11:43 The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?

Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom

reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.

 

For millions and millions of us this online safety act is making no difference to our daily use so what’s the fuss?

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:18

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 14:04 I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to

It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.

XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 15:14

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 11:43 The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?

Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑31 Jul 2025, 14:04 I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to

goose wrote: ↑01 Aug 2025, 11:43 The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?

The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?

I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to

Starmer's trolling the Nation, sure of it...

Because it's all just about protecting kids from suicide, porn, paedos... and pizza.

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 18:58 So … Labour bloke calling Farage a PAEDO : Bad free speech
The bloke who owns Twitter saying everyone should say what they want (including Hitler was a good bloke : Free speech champion!

Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 18:58 So … Labour bloke calling Farage a PAEDO : Bad free speech
The bloke who owns Twitter saying everyone should say what they want (including Hitler was a good bloke : Free speech champion!

Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me

 

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 18:58
Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me