Fab to return.
Posted: 08 Sep 2025, 21:22
Fodringham leaving.
According to Ex.
Improves the squad no doubt.
According to Ex.
Improves the squad no doubt.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
Fab to return.
Page 1 of 2
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 12 Sep 2025, 00:44
Send in the fucking clowns and not because I have anything against Fab. He was great for us, but if he still had value for us (which he well may) then why the fuck did we let him go four months ago only to resign now. This only goes to show how poorly we are run and nothing will get better until we change the board, not that any of that was in doubt but fuck me does this get tedious after awhile. The board live their lives without shame.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 14:03
Didn't see that article.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 13:59
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 13:10Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:17Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 06:31Fabianski just replaces Foderingham as no.3 keeper.
We’ve actually strengthened.That's an interesting way to look at it. Perhaps you're right, if you're going to have three goalkeepers out of those four, it's Foderingham you'd ditch. I'd sooner have a young goalie as third choice but being optimistic I suppose we have strengthened, yeah.Foderingham is leaving anyway mate, just not confirmed yet.
This is a quote from the Fab interview on the OS:
Welcome back, Łukasz! How does it feel to be a Hammer again?
“This is a nice surprise for me, if I’m honest, because everything happened so quick. I found out about the whole situation [with Wes Foderingham potentially departing] just at the end of last week."
Foderingham departing was confirmed on the OS yesterday.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 13:10
Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 12:17Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 06:31Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 01:53 We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.Fabianski just replaces Foderingham as no.3 keeper.
We’ve actually strengthened.That's an interesting way to look at it. Perhaps you're right, if you're going to have three goalkeepers out of those four, it's Foderingham you'd ditch. I'd sooner have a young goalie as third choice but being optimistic I suppose we have strengthened, yeah.
Foderingham is leaving anyway mate, just not confirmed yet.
This is a quote from the Fab interview on the OS:
Welcome back, Łukasz! How does it feel to be a Hammer again?
“This is a nice surprise for me, if I’m honest, because everything happened so quick. I found out about the whole situation [with Wes Foderingham potentially departing] just at the end of last week."
This is a quote from the Fab interview on the OS:
Welcome back, Łukasz! How does it feel to be a Hammer again?
“This is a nice surprise for me, if I’m honest, because everything happened so quick. I found out about the whole situation [with Wes Foderingham potentially departing] just at the end of last week."
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 12:17
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 06:31Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 01:53 We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.Fabianski just replaces Foderingham as no.3 keeper.
We’ve actually strengthened.
That's an interesting way to look at it. Perhaps you're right, if you're going to have three goalkeepers out of those four, it's Foderingham you'd ditch. I'd sooner have a young goalie as third choice but being optimistic I suppose we have strengthened, yeah.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 07:19
Would never be a keeper but ageing keeper is a pretty cushy job.
Play til you are near 40 on a decent wage … when I say play I mean train with the keepers & then go home
Foderingham has had a nice holiday but I guess playing a bit in the Cyprus sunshine becomes more appealing than sitting on your arse after a while
Play til you are near 40 on a decent wage … when I say play I mean train with the keepers & then go home
Foderingham has had a nice holiday but I guess playing a bit in the Cyprus sunshine becomes more appealing than sitting on your arse after a while
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 06:31
Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 01:53 We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.
Fabianski just replaces Foderingham as no.3 keeper.
We’ve actually strengthened.
We’ve actually strengthened.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 02:19
Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 01:53 We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.
Foderingham has gone?
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 01:53
We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 21:39
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 18:48
Foderingham is going to Cyprus where the transfer window is still open
Is Saudi still open? Can they PLEASE take Rodriguez if so
Said last season that even at 40 Fabianski looked capable of playing another season as no2
There wasn’t a massive difference between him & Areola when he played last season
Is Saudi still open? Can they PLEASE take Rodriguez if so
Said last season that even at 40 Fabianski looked capable of playing another season as no2
There wasn’t a massive difference between him & Areola when he played last season
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 18:29
I’m actually surprised no one snapped up Fab over the summer.
Maybe he was being selective, as he wanted to stay in London.
Maybe he was being selective, as he wanted to stay in London.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 18:27
Was foderingham not under contract ? Since he left after window had closed .
why didnt we just keep fabianski in the first place ?
i suppose Sullivan has saved 3 months salary since.
what a fucking clown act
why didnt we just keep fabianski in the first place ?
i suppose Sullivan has saved 3 months salary since.
what a fucking clown act
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 17:57
the coming of gary" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 17:31 on telly i saw a fat, washed up, ex - manager called Wayne Rooney
Still, he's younger than Fabianski
.
Rooney’s younger than Ronaldo, who’ll be starting CF for Portugal at the World Cup next summer.
A shame Rooney didn’t look after himself better, as he could’ve surely had a good couple of extra seasons before hanging up his boots.
A shame Rooney didn’t look after himself better, as he could’ve surely had a good couple of extra seasons before hanging up his boots.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 17:31
on telly i saw a fat, washed up, ex - manager called Wayne Rooney
Still, he's younger than Fabianski
.
Still, he's younger than Fabianski
.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 17:02
Antonio and Carlton Cole double announcement.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 16:46
How many weeks before Antonio is announced?
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 16:32
Haha you couldn't make it up.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 16:29
The poor man was bawling his eyes out 2 months ago. What a shitshow. I reckon he'll be No1 by the end of October.
Im genuinely pleased he's back tho'
Im genuinely pleased he's back tho'
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 10 Sep 2025, 16:05
He's confirmed as returned on the OS.
What a shambles of a club. Very circus like.
What a shambles of a club. Very circus like.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 09 Sep 2025, 13:05
Payet is on the freebie list?
Just saying like.
Just saying like.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 09 Sep 2025, 12:15
Yes. It wouldn't surprise me.
What a circus the club is under Sullivan, Brady, Noble and the rest of the board.
What a circus the club is under Sullivan, Brady, Noble and the rest of the board.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 09 Sep 2025, 11:12
Stanley Matthews played top flight football in his fifties, Stoke I think?
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 09 Sep 2025, 11:04
Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑09 Sep 2025, 11:00 The club done this before with Carlton Cole, under the stewardship of the two geniuses, so it’s not a surprise.
He should have been given another year or two anyway. People are fitter and stronger than ever, and it won’t be long before you see players playing up to 50. I reckon Ronaldo will do it.
Ain’t there a Jap stiker who’s about 50 odd still playing.
Re: Fab to return.
Posted: 09 Sep 2025, 11:00
The club done this before with Carlton Cole, under the stewardship of the two geniuses, so it’s not a surprise.
He should have been given another year or two anyway. People are fitter and stronger than ever, and it won’t be long before you see players playing up to 50. I reckon Ronaldo will do it.
He should have been given another year or two anyway. People are fitter and stronger than ever, and it won’t be long before you see players playing up to 50. I reckon Ronaldo will do it.