West Ham Online

Posted: **09 Sep 2025, 16:48**

Some fairly unpleasant undertones for both Trump and Mandelson in the latest presentation of Epstein information.

Hard not to overly the quoted materials that are in relation to 'birthday notes' from these guys with the trafficking he has been proven to be a part of.

Jeffrey Epstein files and 'birthday book': What we know - BBC News

Mandelson's office saying 'he's said he wishes he never made the connection' is hardly an appropriate response...although the messages being cryptic means they probably count it as enough.

Will it ever all come out? Doubtful...but it's pretty clear that this whole Epstein affair laid bare would have been a disaster for so many public figures, that his convenient death was the best they could do.

What say the sages of WHO?

Posted: **21 Sep 2025, 07:13**

XKhammer wrote: ↑21 Sep 2025, 01:24
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 07:58
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them

Possible but that information, if it exists, has so much potential value it'd be a shame to waste it by dumping it all in the public domain.

If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.

Ohhhh the flat earthers are here ohhhh the freaks and bible bashing morons ohhh

You're R-A-P-E-Y,
You're R-A-P-E-Y,
You know you NONCE, we're sure you NONCE,
You're R-A-P-E-Y.

Posted: **21 Sep 2025, 01:24**

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025, 07:58
Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them

Possible but that information, if it exists, has so much potential value it'd be a shame to waste it by dumping it all in the public domain.

If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.

Ohhhh the flat earthers are here ohhhh the freaks and bible bashing morons ohhh

Posted: **18 Sep 2025, 07:58**

Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them

Possible but that information, if it exists, has so much potential value it'd be a shame to waste it by dumping it all in the public domain.

If Trump can use it to drain swamp is that not a better use? Then, out all these cunts to face justice.

Posted: **18 Sep 2025, 07:09**

MA.

Have to agree there. The Dems went to enough trouble inventing charges to try to stop/jail/bankrupt Trump. Surely if they had evidence that could ruin him they'd have got it into the public domain by now.

Posted: **18 Sep 2025, 00:05**

Leavemyarcelona wrote: ↑17 Sep 2025, 23:49 Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them

I had thought for a while now that Trump isn't trying to protect himself, it's others who he likes he's trying to protect as much as he can. Could even be a surprise like Bill Clinton because Trump loves his Country and might not like the idea of him being officially outed embarrassing a Former President like that, if it can be at all helped. Or someone like that has been my hunch. He doesn't look fazed at all if it was just to protect himself, he always looks totally relaxed about it being him.

It's things like the previous Democrat administrations that have had the opportunity to fuck Trump over good and proper if they had discovered real dirt on Trump involving the Epstein Files but never did. That's a big indicator for me. Could even be Hollywood stars like say a Clint Eastwood or the like he'd want to protect.

Posted: **17 Sep 2025, 23:49**

Personally think there are people higher up then trump on the list and he is terrified of them

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 13:09**

I wonder how many votes of no confidence letters have gone in already on the quiet... 🗳

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 13:00**

It's the political equivalent of the football manager's kiss of death.

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 12:59**

Luckily he only has Badenoch on the other side
Very low ebb for both parties

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 12:56**

It's the fact he publicly backs him in PMQs yesterday and then sacks the twat the next morning, on top of everything else falling apart around him since the return back from their school break.

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 12:29**

Not sure many in the Labour Party were happy at Mandelson being in a senior role so not sure many tears will be shed
Mandelson seemed popular with Trump
Maybe reminiscing over their good times in the old days on Epstein Island

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 12:21**

I think he's done, too. I think this'll escalate rapidly into a Labour feeding frenzy which I think will be amusing to see.

It's becoming untenable.

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 12:10**

Fuck me. Starmer backs Mandy yesterday then sacks him today. When even Bad Enoch is making mince meat of him, he's really is on the rocks.

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 11:00**

Not really.

Trump is an elected President.

Maddie has been sacked time and time again for being a wrongun who obviously possesses pictures of goats

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 10:59**

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 10:55 Mandelson sacked
Maybe we will see others with inappropriate connections to the paedo similarly sacked
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER

A hattrick of sackings for him.

I wonder what this "new information" that came to light, was all about?

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 10:55**

Mandelson sacked
Maybe we will see others with inappropriate connections to the paedo similarly sacked
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 08:57**

Starmer is floundering badly
With Starmer Sunak Truss Johnson & Cameron we have had the 5 worst PM’s since Thatcher. In a row!
Badenoch Farage & Lammy are the leaders next in line aren’t they so not getting any better

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 08:39**

he's also doing a fine job of dragging Starmer down with him.

Posted: **11 Sep 2025, 06:10**

Mandelson is on his way out
Position is untenable
Needs to be asked whether Epstein provided him with underage boys

Posted: **10 Sep 2025, 13:34**

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 13:06 Was reading that this Trump note was in a 238 page scrapbook that Ghislaine Maxwell put together for Epstein’s 50th
Maxwell obviously thinks there is a pardon coming once Trump can push this hoax line a bit further
Not sure what her explanation for a Donald Trump note not by Donald Trump in the scrapbook is but am sure they are working on it
Have abandoned the ‘Trump was working for the FBI to keep an eye on Epstein’ story though

Problem is nobody knows what to believe after all the crying wolf of the last 4 years. It’s all been engineered and fallen Flat so the reasoned assumption is that this is just another gotcha that’s going nowhere.

Posted: **10 Sep 2025, 13:06**

Was reading that this Trump note was in a 238 page scrapbook that Ghislaine Maxwell put together for Epstein’s 50th
Maxwell obviously thinks there is a pardon coming once Trump can push this hoax line a bit further
Not sure what her explanation for a Donald Trump note not by Donald Trump in the scrapbook is but am sure they are working on it
Have abandoned the ‘Trump was working for the FBI to keep an eye on Epstein’ story though

Posted: **10 Sep 2025, 12:53**

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 10:21
Council Scum" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 09:34 Ghislaine Maxwell has also stated that Prince Andrew was set up and didn't do anything wrong.

All you have to do these days is be photographed with a criminal/paedo/murderer, and you are as guilty as them on social media.

Hmmm

Lets have it right, that wasn't even needed, anyone who has worked in or around the BBC knows exactly what a sex pest he has been to women over the years.

As well as the odd dead hooker ALLEGEDLY

Posted: **10 Sep 2025, 10:21**

Council Scum" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 09:34 Ghislaine Maxwell has also stated that Prince Andrew was set up and didn't do anything wrong.

All you have to do these days is be photographed with a criminal/paedo/murderer, and you are as guilty as them on social media.

Hmmm

Posted: **10 Sep 2025, 10:14**

The work of a time traveller is a more credible explanation.

Where can I get hold of a supply of your tin foil?

Posted: **10 Sep 2025, 09:43**

zebthecat wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 09:16
Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 07:15 I would be more inclined to believe Trump wrote those birthday messages to Epstein had the messages been more neutral in tone. The 'we have a lot in common' comment and allusion to 'secrets' is too clumsy in my opinion. Sounds like a hoaxer trying just a bit too hard.

If so said hoaxer was playing a very long game.

...or forged more recently?

West Ham Online

Epstein latest disclosures

Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures

Re: Epstein latest disclosures