West Ham Online

Posted: **27 Sep 2025, 13:01**

Not seen anything about whether he's been sacked or not?

Posted: **08 Oct 2025, 14:32**

Oh dear. Comebacks aren't your strong suit, are they? I'll let you have the last word though so fill your boots.

Posted: **08 Oct 2025, 14:25**

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 14:23
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 13:46
I suppose I could always change my username if I ever l make myself look like a dick and got things wrong?

Best change it today then. It's long overdue.

Talk me through the process.

Posted: **08 Oct 2025, 14:23**

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 13:46
I suppose I could always change my username if I ever l make myself look like a dick and got things wrong?

Best change it today then. It's long overdue.

Posted: **08 Oct 2025, 13:46**

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:39
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 "Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings"

then in same paragraph quoting him saying

"he'll be better than that clown Aguerd"
What's that got to do with anything? Aguerd wasn't a new signing at that point was he? I did say he usually ends up hating most of them.
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 If you're looking at who's winning through point scoring with predictions, then surely I'm up there somewhere high on the leader board. Probably CHAMP.
You're definitely up there with Jaan in the ALWAYS being negative about every signing just so I can say "I told you so" camp. Not sure why you'd want to boast about it though.

I suppose I could always change my username if I ever l make myself look like a dick and got things wrong?

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 21:00**

Apparently he ripped it up in Spain as well in the first 10 games, no one wanted to sign him in the end out there though.

Geezer is a melt.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 17:50**

He's a mixed bag for me of sometimes good and sometimes bad but he was also a part of the Team that helped us win a European Trophy, as did Emerson.

I do agree that he was an absolute cսnt for how he behaved in trying to get out the Club which was muggy, regardless of how much of a car crash the Club currently is.

I'm just not surprised that either are doing well when they leave us (just as Aguerd did playing in Spain on loan) which says a lot about how poorly run we are to me than anything.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 17:43**

In fairness, I thought Aguerd was going to be a good signing for us when he first rocked up. It was after a good few games he played that i realised he was utter pony.

I do turn quicker than milk out the fridge once I've seen enough.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 17:39**

Lee Trundle wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 "Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings"

then in same paragraph quoting him saying

"he'll be better than that clown Aguerd"

What's that got to do with anything? Aguerd wasn't a new signing at that point was he? I did say he usually ends up hating most of them.

Lee Trundle wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 If you're looking at who's winning through point scoring with predictions, then surely I'm up there somewhere high on the leader board. Probably CHAMP.

You're definitely up there with Jaan in the ALWAYS being negative about every signing just so I can say "I told you so" camp. Not sure why you'd want to boast about it though.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 17:24**

"Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings"

then in same paragraph quoting him saying

"he'll be better than that clown Aguerd"

If you're looking at who's winning through point scoring with predictions, then surely I'm up there somewhere high on the leader board. Probably CHAMP.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 17:24**

They've played 4 games in the French league, calm down.

Aguerd refused to play for us to force a move. The end.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 17:02**

Talking of Aguerd and Emerson for that matter, they both continue to rip the cսnt out of it playing at Marseille since they left to join them in both the League and Champions League. Marseille had lost 2 of their first 3 games and now cannot stop winning and conceding very few, even beating the Champions League holders in the process.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 16:04**

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 01:45
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑29 Sep 2025, 13:58 Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Ag, like you weren’t all for Lopetegui and the Kilman signing.

Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings or at least willing to give them a chance (even if he usually ends up hating most of them). I'd say that's better than doing what you do, which is ALWAYS say this new player or manager is shit, and then a few months down the line come out with "I told you so", as if being always negative about West Ham makes you some kind of Nostradamus.

For the record I had a look at what Eerie said about Kilman when we signed him. Seems pretty even handed to me:

"Not a signing I particularly wanted us to make, admittedly because of what I'd read Wolves fans saying, and the couple of times I've seen him play I can't say he ever stood out. However, the manager has worked with him and clearly rates him, he comes with a clean slate for me so I'll give him time to see what he's about. I've seen that Ollie Watkins said he's one of the toughest CB's that he's come up against, so let's see. One thing I'll absolutely guarantee, is that he'll be better than that clown Aguerd."

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 14:22**

SHOOOOOOOCKEEEEERRRRR.!

In other breaking news. Scientists discover. Water is wet.!

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 13:29**

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 01:45
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑29 Sep 2025, 13:58 Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Ag, like you weren’t all for Lopetegui and the Kilman signing.

Rather than make stuff up, go and find what I said, and post it up, instead of this lying rat behaviour.

Being prepared to give players & managers a chance when they first rock up, is not being all for them. Try again.

Posted: **07 Oct 2025, 13:13**

Ahahahahaha,
The inevitable has happened where 'a club source' has said potter and Macauley had nothing to do with Diouf or Fernandes (i.e. the signings that have had the most upside so far) despite what was written at the time.

Fancy that. Who could have seen that coming?

Posted: **30 Sep 2025, 01:45**

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑29 Sep 2025, 13:58 Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Ag, like you weren’t all for Lopetegui and the Kilman signing.

Posted: **30 Sep 2025, 01:28**

what about the aromatherapy coach..?

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 13:59**

Guilty as charged.

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 13:58**

Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 13:47**

Fuck the wasteful cսnt off along with Potter. £40M for Fernandes, £20M for Hermansen, this the same chap that scouted and wanted Mudryk for £89M at Chelsea.

He aint the answer to our recruitment strategy especially when he also seeked new Full Backs we didn't need at the expense of getting in a young quality Striker with that money. That as well as clog up pathways for our own Academy players to progress.

Can't wait to see the back of him along with his useless pal Potter.

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 10:38**

On Hammers Chat didn't Geo say that he's gone all the rest of Potter's hangers on.

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 08:54**

Guess because we paid compensation it would be embarrassing to bin him off 5 mins later
Imagine once Nuno gets his feet under the table & his connections in place I imagine he will quietly leave

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 08:51**

Nuno uses Jorge Mendes as his preferred agent and a lot of players are recruited that way. Could Macaulay work on the analytics and scouting side alongside? I suppose if he answers to Nuno it would be another way to identify and recruit players and his stats/ analysis coukd even be used by Nuno to validate players being suggested by Mendes? But more likely he will move on at some point soon you would guess?

Posted: **29 Sep 2025, 07:33**

Vexed wrote: ↑28 Sep 2025, 23:05
honky cat" wrote: ↑28 Sep 2025, 22:06 Hes still listed as staff on the website. He'd be fucking stupid to resign his well paid job over cock piss going, he probably helped push him under the bus. The club would be stupid to sack him, as i think hes done ok so far. Everyone has known for a couple of years a complete rebuild is needed, but will take probably 3, 4, 5 transfer windows. Potters job was to play to our strengths in the meantime and he couldnt do it.

He's done OK? How the fuckin hell can his zero contribution constitute OK? Look at the signings, hardly unknowns were they? Macaulay is basically expensive chat GPT. The geezer should fuck off with his silly fucking beige cardboard cսnt mate.

ok sorry

Posted: **28 Sep 2025, 23:05**

honky cat" wrote: ↑28 Sep 2025, 22:06 Hes still listed as staff on the website. He'd be fucking stupid to resign his well paid job over cock piss going, he probably helped push him under the bus. The club would be stupid to sack him, as i think hes done ok so far. Everyone has known for a couple of years a complete rebuild is needed, but will take probably 3, 4, 5 transfer windows. Potters job was to play to our strengths in the meantime and he couldnt do it.

He's done OK? How the fuckin hell can his zero contribution constitute OK? Look at the signings, hardly unknowns were they? Macaulay is basically expensive chat GPT. The geezer should fuck off with his silly fucking beige cardboard cսnt mate.

West Ham Online

McCauley

McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley

Re: McCauley