Page 1 of 1
Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 01:19
by Gank
Released by Manchester United. Don't overreact to that, Rice was released by Chelsea.
If Macaulay is behind this, I'm starting to think he might be worth keeping around and that his remit for signing young players with potential to grow into either saleable assets or first team players is wholly independent of who the manager is.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 14:23
by Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Yeah, it's pretty telling that in the last 15 years, we've made a loss on nearly all the 1st team players we've bought except Payet and Kudus, while young players that cost us nothing like Fletcher, Diangana and Rice have paid off. Yet for years Sullivan didn't want to invest anything in the academy because he thought it was a complete waste of money.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 13:36
by Gank
Yep, it does seem that way but since it's low risk, I like the idea of it. We can have an almost unlimited number of these and only one has to come good to fund all the others.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 13:21
by Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Yeah, maybe so. Hard to tell. The fact that he's only on a 1 year contract with 1 year option suggests that the club don't have much faith in him though.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 13:07
by Gank
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 09:38
Much as I admire the positivity, being released at 20 is quite a bit different to being released at 14. I don't imagine anyone's expecting him to end up as a premier league player, but we needed a replacement when we loaned out 2 of our other U21 keepers. We also brought in another 20 year old keeper, Reece Byrne.
I don't imagine Macaulay had anything to do with either signing, unless he's been scouting non league matches.
I get your point about being released at 20 rather than 14 but another way to look at it is that Manchester United saw first team potential in this kid for 6 years in a row after he was 14 and it was only at the very time he should have been knocking on the first team door that they drew the line.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 11:48
by Swiss.
I'd prefer Bertie
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 11:35
by Far Cough UKunt
Did we get any dosh for that Man U hooligan we signed Ravel Morrison or summat?
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 10:15
by THUNDERCLINT
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 09:56
We sold Ashley Fletcher to Boro for £6.5m (one of only a handful of players we've made a decent profit on during Sullivan's reign), so he's actually a very good example of a saleable asset.
Well we spunked that on Jaanai Gordon and Danny Whitehead...Mipo Odubeko...
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 09:56
by Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
We sold Ashley Fletcher to Boro for £6.5m (one of only a handful of players we've made a decent profit on during Sullivan's reign), so he's actually a very good example of a saleable asset.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 09:51
by THUNDERCLINT
Gank wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 01:19
Released by Manchester United. Don't overreact to that, Rice was released by Chelsea.
If Macaulay is behind this, I'm starting to think he might be worth keeping around and that his remit for signing young players with potential to grow into either saleable assets or first team players is wholly independent of who the manager is.
Ashley Fletcher, David Bellion and a bunch of other non league destined cunts whose names even their parents can't remember say hi.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 09:38
by theaxeman
Sauce?
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 09:38
by Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Much as I admire the positivity, being released at 20 is quite a bit different to being released at 14. I don't imagine anyone's expecting him to end up as a premier league player, but we needed a replacement when we loaned out 2 of our other U21 keepers. We also brought in another 20 year old keeper, Reece Byrne.
I don't imagine Macaulay had anything to do with either signing, unless he's been scouting non league matches.
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 09:29
by Far Cough UKunt
eusebiovic wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 09:12
Good genetics if his father Bertie is anything to go by...
Hahahaha
Re: Tom Wooster signed
Posted: 30 Sep 2025, 09:12
by eusebiovic
Good genetics if his father Bertie is anything to go by...