Set pieces and their standing in the game
Posted: 01 Oct 2025, 12:25
I find it very interesting how much talk and emphasis there has been placed on set pieces in the game of late with countless articles and talking heads going all misty eyed about it's genius, and it really feels like a healthy dose of hypocrisy and whataboutism.
It always used to be a backhanded compliment to teams like a Stoke or a Bolton who used set pieces to their maximum advantage to make up the skill gap between them and the top sides. 'Oh, they are good at set pieces. They're just a big physical negative side. You know what you're going to get.' Always viewed as an ugly and non desirable and negative way of playing the game which top teams should never get involved in. Anti football. It was levelled at us a couple of seasons ago when Dawson and Zouma and Soucek were great presences for us from corners.
Now since Arsenal started doing it, it's all of a sudden become romanticised and idealised and something to aspire to, and it's a 'smart' clever and pioneering way of gaining any 'marginal gain' you can when in reality they are just doing the same thing the likes of Tony Pulis had his sides doing 15 years ago and the same people were looking down their noses at it and talking about them scornfully.
Ridiculous really. Just because certain sides are doing it, it now becomes clever and revolutionary instead of uncultured and behind the times.
It always used to be a backhanded compliment to teams like a Stoke or a Bolton who used set pieces to their maximum advantage to make up the skill gap between them and the top sides. 'Oh, they are good at set pieces. They're just a big physical negative side. You know what you're going to get.' Always viewed as an ugly and non desirable and negative way of playing the game which top teams should never get involved in. Anti football. It was levelled at us a couple of seasons ago when Dawson and Zouma and Soucek were great presences for us from corners.
Now since Arsenal started doing it, it's all of a sudden become romanticised and idealised and something to aspire to, and it's a 'smart' clever and pioneering way of gaining any 'marginal gain' you can when in reality they are just doing the same thing the likes of Tony Pulis had his sides doing 15 years ago and the same people were looking down their noses at it and talking about them scornfully.
Ridiculous really. Just because certain sides are doing it, it now becomes clever and revolutionary instead of uncultured and behind the times.