Page 1 of 2
Potts the plodder
Posted: 17 Jan 2026, 19:32
by Mad Ferret
Not involved today and we win. Has generally been exposed lately as not being up to it.
Soucek far the superior option in the middle.
Would be worth getting rid before the end of the window IMO.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 13 Mar 2026, 18:40
by stubbo-admin
stubbo-admin test notificaion
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 12 Feb 2026, 13:29
by scott_d
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑12 Feb 2026, 09:11
scott_d wrote: ↑12 Feb 2026, 08:27
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 10:15
We looked so much better when Magassa came on.
West Ham 1-0 Man Utd
79 - Potts off, Magassa on
West Ham 1-1 Man Utd
Yep, much, much better.
We created umpteen chances when Magassa was introduced.
We just failed to take them.
We also conceded 1 goal, another that was disallowed, and one that was inches past the post.
We could have won the game 3-0 and you'd still be on here digging out Potts.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 12 Feb 2026, 10:14
by cygnet24
Pompey would bite our hands off.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 12 Feb 2026, 09:11
by Mad Ferret
scott_d wrote: ↑12 Feb 2026, 08:27
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 10:15
We looked so much better when Magassa came on.
West Ham 1-0 Man Utd
79 - Potts off, Magassa on
West Ham 1-1 Man Utd
Yep, much, much better.
We created umpteen chances when Magassa was introduced.
We just failed to take them.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 12 Feb 2026, 08:27
by scott_d
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 10:15
We looked so much better when Magassa came on.
West Ham 1-0 Man Utd
79 - Potts off, Magassa on
West Ham 1-1 Man Utd
Yep, much, much better.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 16:22
by twoleftfeet
Don’t feed this Spurs fan, he needs it to thrive.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 10:17
by Far Cough UKunt
You mean when they equalised?
Yeah OK
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 10:15
by Mad Ferret
We looked so much better when Magassa came on.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 09:53
by Tomshardware
The mark of how much Potts has come on, held his own against ratty and co.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 09:10
by Mad Ferret
Rossal wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 08:58
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 08:57
Another game that completely passed him by.
Desperate even by your standards
Did you think he played well?
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 08:58
by Rossal
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 08:57
Another game that completely passed him by.
Desperate even by your standards
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 08:58
by dealcanvey
Have a splendid day Ferret.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 11 Feb 2026, 08:57
by Mad Ferret
Another game that completely passed him by.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 17:27
by twoleftfeet
Ferret is a fisherman, ignore him.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 15:41
by Hammer I am
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 13:35
3 up at HT sans Potts.
Coincidence?
coming on a thread after a great win to chew out a player that wasn't even on the pitch, coincidence?
You loss really hurt last week didn't it
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 15:31
by Mike Oxsaw
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 15:15
You think he has a missus? He lives with his mum
He has both. Same person
I never realised that he has Norfolk ancestry. He's kept that mighty quiet. Give me six, three eyes.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 15:15
by Mad Dog
You think he has a missus? He lives with his mum
He has both. Same person
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 13:35
by Mad Ferret
3 up at HT sans Potts.
Coincidence?
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 12:46
by twoleftfeet
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 12:27
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 19:32
Not involved today and we win. Has generally been exposed lately as not being up to it.
Soucek far the superior option in the middle.
Would be worth getting rid before the end of the window IMO.
If he's not involved today that means he'll be roaring up your missus...yet again.
You think he has a missus? He lives with his mum
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 12:27
by Mike Oxsaw
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 19:32
Not involved today and we win. Has generally been exposed lately as not being up to it.
Soucek far the superior option in the middle.
Would be worth getting rid before the end of the window IMO.
If he's not involved today that means he'll be roaring up your missus...yet again.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 12:20
by Fat, Bald n 50
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑17 Jan 2026, 19:32
Not involved today and we win. Has generally been exposed lately as not being up to it.
Soucek far the superior option in the middle.
Would be worth getting rid before the end of the window IMO.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 18 Jan 2026, 17:56
by twoleftfeet
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 18 Jan 2026, 17:54
by Mad Ferret
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑18 Jan 2026, 17:51
He clearly has mental health issues, I pity him.
That might explain some of his performances, to be fair!
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 18 Jan 2026, 17:51
by twoleftfeet
He clearly has mental health issues, I pity him.
Re: Potts the plodder
Posted: 18 Jan 2026, 17:45
by Mad Ferret
Do wonder if Pompey would be interested in taking him back on a permanent deal.
He might come in handy for their relegation battle, but if they do go down, they’ll have a league 1 standard player there ready to help them get back up.
