AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Crapaqueta
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8549
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
In his last 94 matches in 2 and a half seasons he has made 7 assists and just 3 of those games we won - Luton, Wolves and Ten Hags woeful Man Utd. That's not just bad, it's horrific end product.
As good as he was for that 1 excellent assist in the ECL Final against Fiorentina (look where they are now), it's a myth he's some kind of quality creative goal making Footballer at the top level.
Living off hype and showboating style rather than substance to go with it. The likes of Di Canio and Payet could actually back up their flair with consistent end product. Paqueta does it once in a blue moon years apart.
Re: Crapaqueta
he's the type of luxury player that we can do without right now. Yes he can make passes that score you goals and win you games but we need him to work hard and keep the ball and not lose it and put a brittle defence like ours under pressure by losing it, especially given out predicament. We should have sold him in retrospect. I wonder if there is any legal blowback on the FA whose years long dithering on his betting scandal has seen his value likely plummet to under half what Man City were once going to pay. I reckon we'd be lucky to get 20M for him in a relegation fire sale.
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2372
- Has liked: 1536 times
- Been liked: 815 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Not the sort you need in a relegation dog fight.
Flatters to deceive most of the time...and a fucking liability a lot of the time.
Braindead cսnt
Flatters to deceive most of the time...and a fucking liability a lot of the time.
Braindead cսnt
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8549
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 3024
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 130 times
- Been liked: 708 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Tomshardware wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:39twoleftfeet wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:28 Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space.Frustrating as his mistake was you can't really accuse him of being anonymous.
That was slightly harsh of me. He did try but he just doesn’t seem to have a pass or goal in him anymore. I think a fresh start is best for all parties.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 1373
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 749 times
- Been liked: 343 times
Re: Crapaqueta
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:28 Oh come on he was anonymous the whole game! Waste of fucking space.
Frustrating as his mistake was you can't really accuse him of being anonymous.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8549
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
So a moment that didn't count is the best we can now hope for from Paqueta against a moment that did for Villa? Time to sell and get what we can and move on from him.
He's become a serious liability in the side now, if it aint gifting the opposition equalisers, it's getting himself suspended, not just once but twice after just 13 League games as soon as he just came back.
Re: Crapaqueta
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 20:23 I've become increasingly disillusioned with him over the pasty couple of seasons.
I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores
If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.
That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.
He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays
Hard to argue against that, although if we understand his frustration at the FA and refs who almost ruined his life, I won't let the occasion of Liverpool affect my judgement of him as he's a young Brazilian bloke, he won't have appreciated the gravity of Bonds' death.
I'm probably too old school to use West Ham forums (fora?) these days, I support West Ham for love and entertainment and really loved our time in the Championship so risky flair players letting us down and getting us off our seats in equal measures is as important to me as the grafters whereas tourists and the sort of West Ham supporters who live on the internet these days would be happier with those same grafters I value but swapping the flair players for a load of cloggers and ball holders if it guaranteed survival.
Nobody likes Sullivan but he does get an easy ride by sanctioning more Igor Julio's and Max Kilmans than Paolo Di Canios and Lucas Paquetas
I'm probably too old school to use West Ham forums (fora?) these days, I support West Ham for love and entertainment and really loved our time in the Championship so risky flair players letting us down and getting us off our seats in equal measures is as important to me as the grafters whereas tourists and the sort of West Ham supporters who live on the internet these days would be happier with those same grafters I value but swapping the flair players for a load of cloggers and ball holders if it guaranteed survival.
Nobody likes Sullivan but he does get an easy ride by sanctioning more Igor Julio's and Max Kilmans than Paolo Di Canios and Lucas Paquetas
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 3024
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 130 times
- Been liked: 708 times
-
Gary Strodders shank
- Posts: 1048
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 22 times
- Been liked: 198 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I've become increasingly disillusioned with him over the pasty couple of seasons.
I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores
If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.
That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.
He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays
I'm not convinced his heart is in it with us despite all the badge stuff when he scores
If it wasn't for the betting probe he would be at Man city and now his stock has fallen further he won't be attracting the kind of elite clubs he clearly thought he was destined for a couple of seasons ago.
That is his frustration with refs and the FA and for me his actions against Liverpool were disrespectful to the occasion the club and it's fans.
He is player who divides opinion and clearly has the ability but simply doesn't show it enough plus his decision making and temperament make him a liability for me nowadays
Re: Crapaqueta
He also played the most impressive pass of the entire match, the through ball to Bowen who lazily didn't bother getting onside properly so the goal was chalked off, which will have delighted you and your assist stats for Paqueta.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8549
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
He certainly defended well for the Team needlessly gifting back possession to Villa in our half of the pitch that then led to Rogers 1st goal and Villas equaliser to get them back in the game just after half time. Nothing responsible and playing for the Team about that costly error showboating.
Re: Crapaqueta
Anyone who was actually there today will have appreciated the tremendous work rate of this bloke, by far our hardest working player today. You just won't see that on the telly.
He puts a shift in trying to defend as well, he's just not great at it.
Some of the risks he takes are frustrating but that's what you get from technically brilliant flair players.
He puts a shift in trying to defend as well, he's just not great at it.
Some of the risks he takes are frustrating but that's what you get from technically brilliant flair players.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8549
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
*Correction - He was involved in Villa’s Rogers goal by getting caught dicking about on the ball gifting it back to them
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8549
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Yet another game is fails to create an assist, his 60th consecutive match in a row and not involved in either goal. Carrying the waste of space these days.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 3024
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 130 times
- Been liked: 708 times
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2649
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 441 times
-
eusebiovic
- Posts: 738
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 1256 times
- Been liked: 253 times
Re: Crapaqueta
It's become a running joke with Paqueta now...He does it so often that other teams actively press and target him for that very reason.
Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Costs us yet another goal and potentially 2 points.
Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
Re: Crapaqueta
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:35fraser wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:33Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 11:26Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocksYou're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Yep and we also didn't lose or won the previous times we played the same opposition with him in the team therefore the results didn't improve..
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really
