Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1513
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 106 times
Been liked: 344 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 17:02
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:40
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:29
 
Whether I have a problem with it is irrelevant. What's relevant, for the purpose of a criminal conviction, is the what is actually meant by the statement and the author's intentions.

 "For all I care" is a very important part of the statement because it completely charges the the intent of everything that comes before and after.

This is primary school level language comprehension, so I see why you're struggling.
 
lets hope all the radical hate clerics don't find out that loophole.
It's also quite ridiculous how you liberal morons alway try to associate a housewife (?)  shitposting on twitter in the aftermath of 3 children being murdered to a radical hate cleric.
house wife, or hate cleric is completely irrelevant, and since you're all about following the law to the letter of course you know that don't you. I used the example because I knew you'd be a hypocrite about it. PS I'm not liberal, I'm just not a fucking cheerleader and a hypocrite when "my side" is in the wrong for once
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:40
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:29
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:15
 
the "for all I care" is a statement that she doesn't think that's going too far, not that she doesnt care either way, you're really are trying too hard not to understand this

OK then, so if a musliim said

set fire to all the fucking primary schools full of western kids for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them"

you wouldn't have a problem with it no?, 
 
Whether I have a problem with it is irrelevant. What's relevant, for the purpose of a criminal conviction, is the what is actually meant by the statement and the author's intentions.

 "For all I care" is a very important part of the statement because it completely charges the the intent of everything that comes before and after.

This is primary school level language comprehension, so I see why you're struggling.
 
lets hope all the radical hate clerics don't find out that loophole.
It's also quite ridiculous how you liberal morons alway try to associate a housewife (?)  shitposting on twitter in the aftermath of 3 children being murdered to a radical hate cleric.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:40
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:29
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:15
 
the "for all I care" is a statement that she doesn't think that's going too far, not that she doesnt care either way, you're really are trying too hard not to understand this

OK then, so if a musliim said

set fire to all the fucking primary schools full of western kids for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them"

you wouldn't have a problem with it no?, 
 
Whether I have a problem with it is irrelevant. What's relevant, for the purpose of a criminal conviction, is the what is actually meant by the statement and the author's intentions.

 "For all I care" is a very important part of the statement because it completely charges the the intent of everything that comes before and after.

This is primary school level language comprehension, so I see why you're struggling.
 
right right, adding "for all I care" at the end of an inflammatory sentence means you're not angry at all, lets hope all the radical hate clerics don't find out that loophole.

"for all I care" is very much used at the end of a statement declaring an outcome you would actually like to see, and if we're playing this game where you pretend to be My Thickie, she said it after the burning hotels things, but notably before the "and take all the politicians with you" so in your interpretation she cares for that part to happen at least then
It doesn't matter if she was angry, it doesn't matter if she'd have enjoyed watching it.

What matters is did she intend to encourage or incite people to do it beyond a reasonable doubt.

The very fact the meaning of the post can be argued creates a reasonable doubt.

As I said, leave it to the grown ups.

Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:29
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:15
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:09
"for all I care" that right there disqualifies the statement as a encouragement. She's not telling people to do it, she's statement how she'd feel if it happened. 

Lack of empathy is not a crime.

The only part of the statement that qualifies as an expression of a desired outcome is "mass deportations now".
 
the "for all I care" is a statement that she doesn't think that's going too far, not that she doesnt care either way, you're really are trying too hard not to understand this

OK then, so if a musliim said

set fire to all the fucking primary schools full of western kids for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them"

you wouldn't have a problem with it no?, 
 
Whether I have a problem with it is irrelevant. What's relevant, for the purpose of a criminal conviction, is the what is actually meant by the statement and the author's intentions.

 "For all I care" is a very important part of the statement because it completely charges the the intent of everything that comes before and after.

This is primary school level language comprehension, so I see why you're struggling.
 
 
right right, adding "for all I care" at the end of an inflammatory sentence means you're not angry at all, lets hope all the radical hate clerics don't find out that loophole.

"for all I care" is very much used at the end of a statement declaring an outcome you would actually like to see, and if we're playing this game where you pretend to be My Thickie, she said it after the burning hotels things, but notably before the "and take all the politicians with you" so in your interpretation she cares for that part to happen at least then
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:15
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:09
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:24
 
 
I think you're being deliberately obtuse:

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them" is not in the same ballpark as "go to hell", especially as people were quite willing to take the first statement at face value 
"for all I care" that right there disqualifies the statement as a encouragement. She's not telling people to do it, she's statement how she'd feel if it happened. 

Lack of empathy is not a crime.

The only part of the statement that qualifies as an expression of a desired outcome is "mass deportations now".
 
the "for all I care" is a statement that she doesn't think that's going too far.
You've just created reasonable doubt. You're saying she's expressing an opinion about it not an instruction to do it.

I told you a someone with the IQ of a sponge could defend her.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:25
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:21
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:18
well she pleaded guilty for a start
Out of fear of a longer sentence and mostly likely tainted legal advice.
That cant be true, you said someone a brief with an IQ of a sponge would have got her off.
Well it can be true because I suggested her brief was at best, politically motivated, at worst, bent, not stupid.

You should really leave this to the grown ups.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:15
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:09
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:24
 
 
I think you're being deliberately obtuse:

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them" is not in the same ballpark as "go to hell", especially as people were quite willing to take the first statement at face value 
"for all I care" that right there disqualifies the statement as a encouragement. She's not telling people to do it, she's statement how she'd feel if it happened. 

Lack of empathy is not a crime.

The only part of the statement that qualifies as an expression of a desired outcome is "mass deportations now".
 
the "for all I care" is a statement that she doesn't think that's going too far, not that she doesnt care either way, you're really are trying too hard not to understand this

OK then, so if a musliim said

set fire to all the fucking primary schools full of western kids for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them"

you wouldn't have a problem with it no?, 
 
 
Whether I have a problem with it is irrelevant. What's relevant, for the purpose of a criminal conviction, is the what is actually meant by the statement and the author's intentions.

 "For all I care" is a very important part of the statement because it completely changes the the intent of everything that comes before and after.

This is primary school level language comprehension, so I see why you're struggling.
Last edited by THUNDERCLINT on 26 Dec 2025, 16:37, edited 1 time in total.
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:21
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:18
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:14
Who do you know personally that was incited to act on that comment? Yourself? Those nearest & dearest to you who share a common mindset? Your postman? The bloke stacking shelves at your local supermarket? The homeless in your area? Those among your acquaintances who care about their country?
well she pleaded guilty for a start
Out of fear of a longer sentence and mostly likely tainted legal advice.
That cant be true, you said someone a brief with an IQ of a sponge would have got her off.

You didn't answer my question, if an iman at a mosque say used exactly the same words, but just substituted the word hotel for schools, you wouldn't see that as some sort of incitement?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:18
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:14
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:25
I gave far cough the benefit of the doubt he was being deliberately thick, with you I'm not so sure
Who do you know personally that was incited to act on that comment? Yourself? Those nearest & dearest to you who share a common mindset? Your postman? The bloke stacking shelves at your local supermarket? The homeless in your area? Those among your acquaintances who care about their country?
well she pleaded guilty for a start
Out of fear of a longer sentence and mostly likely tainted legal advice.
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:14
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:25
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:22
" Eat shit and die" now carries a charge of administering a noxious substance and attempted murder.
I gave far cough the benefit of the doubt he was being deliberately thick, with you I'm not so sure
Who do you know personally that was incited to act on that comment? Yourself? Those nearest & dearest to you who share a common mindset? Your postman? The bloke stacking shelves at your local supermarket? The homeless in your area? Those among your acquaintances who care about their country?
well she pleaded guilty for a start
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 16:09
Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:24
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
 
 
I think you're being deliberately obtuse:

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them" is not in the same ballpark as "go to hell", especially as people were quite willing to take the first statement at face value 
"for all I care" that right there disqualifies the statement as a encouragement. She's not telling people to do it, she's statement how she'd feel if it happened. 

Lack of empathy is not a crime.

The only part of the statement that qualifies as an expression of a desired outcome is "mass deportations now".
 
 
the "for all I care" is a statement that she doesn't think that's going too far, not that she doesnt care either way, you're really are trying too hard not to understand this

OK then, so if a musliim said

set fire to all the fucking primary schools full of western kids for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them"

you wouldn't have a problem with it no?, 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5534
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 802 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:25
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:22
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
" Eat shit and die" now carries a charge of administering a noxious substance and attempted murder.
I gave far cough the benefit of the doubt he was being deliberately thick, with you I'm not so sure
Who do you know personally that was incited to act on that comment? Yourself? Those nearest & dearest to you who share a common mindset? Your postman? The bloke stacking shelves at your local supermarket? The homeless in your area? Those among your acquaintances who care about their country?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:25
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:22
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
" Eat shit and die" now carries a charge of administering a noxious substance and attempted murder.
I gave far cough the benefit of the doubt he was being deliberately thick, with you I'm not so sure
And yet I'm sure about you.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:24
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
 
 
I think you're being deliberately obtuse:

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them" is not in the same ballpark as "go to hell", especially as people were quite willing to take the first statement at face value 
"for all I care" that right there disqualifies the statement as a encouragement. She's not telling people to do it, she's statement how she'd feel if it happened. 

Lack of empathy is not a crime.

The only part of the statement that qualifies as an expression of a desired outcome is "mass deportations now".
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 15:22
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
" Eat shit and die" now carries a charge of administering a noxious substance and attempted murder.
I gave far cough the benefit of the doubt he was being deliberately thick, with you I'm not so sure
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
 
 
 
 
I think you're being deliberately obtuse:

“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care, while you’re at it take the treacherous government and politicians with them" is not in the same ballpark as "go to hell", especially as people were quite willing to take the first statement at face value 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 14:02 So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
" Eat shit and die" now carries a charge of administering a noxious substance and attempted murder.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2368
Has liked: 652 times
Been liked: 1026 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

So if I say "go to hell" will I get charged for inciting eternal damnation?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1538
Been liked: 369 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hammer I am" wrote: 26 Dec 2025, 13:09 We all know things have gone too far with police getting involved with social media but if that isn't inicitement of violence I don't know what is, care to explain why it isn't Surface?
Essentially it comes down to intent. Did she intend to encourage or provoke others into committing violent acts.

A brief with the IQ of a sponge could create enough reasonable doubt in less than a quater of an hour to get most of these cases tossed, and why Kweer wants rid of juries.

She was overcharged from the beginning it was never more than a caution.
Hammer I am
Posts: 410
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 101 times
Been liked: 104 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

We all know things have gone too far with police getting involved with social media but if that isn't inicitement of violence I don't know what is, care to explain why it isn't Surface?
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4614
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 80 times
Been liked: 689 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

‘Set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards’

Nothing to see there 
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 911
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 169 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

Fauxstralian wrote: 24 Dec 2025, 17:57
I understood you thought Tory woman inciting mass murder should have received no penalty
Factually untrue, you pathetic, limp-wristed, Muslim-loving, anti-Semitic cսnt.

Lucy Connolly NEVER incited anything.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6465
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 590 times
Been liked: 1127 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 25 Dec 2025, 14:58 That was easy 🎣🎣🎣🎣🎣🎣🎣
Nothings easy in your life joyo son, comes from being poor & thick.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6465
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 590 times
Been liked: 1127 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 25 Dec 2025, 13:42
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: 25 Dec 2025, 05:56
goose wrote: 23 Dec 2025, 15:44
that's lucy connolly again you pillock.
I'm having  goose for dinner  today ..never had it  before .. going by the pong my day is off to a tricky start.
.
Merry  fookin Christmas  one and all..
men /woman  /resident n17 

Having goose for dinner?
Has his missus kicked him out or you doing volunteer work at a soup kitchen?
 
There he is, joyo cratchet. Which disabled child did you wake up with this morning?

hopefully someone gave you a tenner for Xmas so you can finally afford that train to broxbourne.
Post Reply