AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1492
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 106 times
- Been liked: 336 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 641
- Has liked: 381 times
- Been liked: 166 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Westside wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 15:41, wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
Yes, I wish we had had one. It would be much better than that referendum on switching to AV, a watered down and complicated version of first past the post, that we had in 2011.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
how the Lib-Dems betrayed their values when they teamed-up with the Tories, especially Nick Clegg... another 'nose in the troth' cսnt, went on to earn multi-millions with Meta/Facebook.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5525
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 104 times
- Been liked: 796 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:59 Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
We KNOW the current lot are not fit to govern under the Labour party mandate (through experience). We KNOW the previous lot are not fit to govern under the Tory party mandate (through experience).
We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
We have no experience of how Reform UK will perform as we have no experience of them either way. Surely that alone is a better reason for voting them in than continuing with either of the previous governmental parties who we KNOW are not up to the task.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
, wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
If only we'd had a referendum on PR, so people could their feelings be known on the subject...
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1213
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 706 times
- Been liked: 696 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
, wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:53 It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
So you'd like us to move to proportional representation instead of FPTP, Mr Comma? You've kept that quiet 
(Of course you'd prefer PR - it's the only way the Lib Dems would get a sniff of power)
(Of course you'd prefer PR - it's the only way the Lib Dems would get a sniff of power)
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4599
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 683 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Change is fine
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
If it’s a change to competence
What makes you think Nigel and a bunch of failed Tories who created a lot of the mess is a useful and successful change?
A cabinet of Nigel , Tice, Zahawi , Jenrick, Cruella Braverman & Liz Truss … do you have confidence in them?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It’s no surprise that people want change when our present government took power with a mandate from a minority of the electorate. If we change government though because of the FPP system we will still be governed by a party that most of us will have voted against.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
Unless or until we adopt a system at Westminster which proportionally represents the way people vote the UK is going to continue in this downhill route to chaos and oblivion.
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1213
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 706 times
- Been liked: 696 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 14:05Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi
But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter
![]()
See what I mean?? His head is far too big for his haircut! This man is not right. Makes my jeebs heeb.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5525
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 104 times
- Been liked: 796 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi
But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter
You can smell the fear here, even online. The country NEEDS a change of people and policy in the elected administration.
The state and media will do all they can to prevent that change, but better by far that it happens by ballot, even, if, like Brexit, that ballot doesn't deliver what the state and media hierarchy feel they (and fuck everybody else) "justifiably" are entitled to.
The state and media will do all they can to prevent that change, but better by far that it happens by ballot, even, if, like Brexit, that ballot doesn't deliver what the state and media hierarchy feel they (and fuck everybody else) "justifiably" are entitled to.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8548
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 13:51 As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi
But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4599
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 80 times
- Been liked: 683 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
As they say … not every Reform supporter is a racist, fascist or Nazi
But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter
But every racist, fascist & Nazi is a Reform supporter
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8548
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Principled move by Torbitt who I've long respected for speaking fairly and a lot of the time wirh common sense even though he's on the Left.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 641
- Has liked: 381 times
- Been liked: 166 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If Reform are going to win this Gorton and Denton by-election, it would probably help if they could find the right fucking place to campaign in! 
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/reform-mp-lee ... ccounter=1
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/reform-mp-lee ... ccounter=1
-
Fat, Bald n 50
- Posts: 84
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 15 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
They're sniffing possible Cabinet jobs in 2029, some will even be considering a challenge to Farage as a lot of people agree with what Reform want to offer but the thought of Farage will push them towards the Greens or Lib Dems.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 4301
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 1353 times
- Been liked: 1730 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 12:21 coma we get it, you're labour if you're talking nastiness ask the farmers how they feel about labour and the pensioners that had their WFA stopped, (now reversed due to the outcry), they're fucking scum mate.
All of them, ignore the colour of the fucking tie
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2354
- Has liked: 644 times
- Been liked: 1010 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
coma we get it, you're labour if you're talking nastiness ask the farmers how they feel about labour and the pensioners that had their WFA stopped, (now reversed due to the outcry), they're fucking scum mate.
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 647
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 132 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yusuf was only criticising the Tories a few months ago for the secret Afghan asylum leak. Braverman was the home secretary at the time, Jenrick immigration minister.
Shadow cabinet chums now.
Shadow cabinet chums now.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
With the drift of MPs from the conservatives to Reform we can see that many of those individuals were from the nasty wing of their party. In essence these leavers are helping sanitise Badenoch’s Tory remainers whilst at the same time ensuring that Reform retains its basic nastiness level.
There is now a problem brewing within Reform whereby candidates who stood for them in the last election, and run lots of close calls, are being pushed aside by Farage so that twerps like Rosindell stand. Romford constituency is a case in point where the conservatives are enraged about Rosindell’s defection and the Reformers want to retain their candidate who they canvassed for and nearly won with last time out.
What this undoubtedly shows is that Farage is no different to any other politician in the way he treats people within his party. And incidentally looking at the calibre of these defectors it’s as if Reform were a PL team it is taking the worst, not the best, players from a relegated team.
There is now a problem brewing within Reform whereby candidates who stood for them in the last election, and run lots of close calls, are being pushed aside by Farage so that twerps like Rosindell stand. Romford constituency is a case in point where the conservatives are enraged about Rosindell’s defection and the Reformers want to retain their candidate who they canvassed for and nearly won with last time out.
What this undoubtedly shows is that Farage is no different to any other politician in the way he treats people within his party. And incidentally looking at the calibre of these defectors it’s as if Reform were a PL team it is taking the worst, not the best, players from a relegated team.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2354
- Has liked: 644 times
- Been liked: 1010 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If Reform is going to turn into Tory Lite, what's the fucking point?
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 4301
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 1353 times
- Been liked: 1730 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 07:25 Reform now has Boris Johnson’s… - chancellor (Zahawi) - communities sec (Jenrick) - culture sec (Dorries) - attorney general (Braverman) - political sec (Kruger) - skills minister (Jenkyns) - Northern powerhouse minister (Berry) - health minister (Caulfield) - parliamentary private sec (Nici) - assistant whip (Holloway) - Scottish minister (Offord)
I thought the point of voting Reform was because the two main parties fucked up and we need to try something new?
correct, a collective of cunts. led by a tory loving snake oil salesman called nigel. politics, and the state of the self serving pigs in suits, is at an all time low
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2679
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 669 times
- Been liked: 1043 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
ED.
Yea,its a shame the 'big hitters' on the center right couldn't settle their differences and work together to make changes that really matter.
Again,have to agree with you re Rupert Lowe.
In an ideal world, he'd run the show,he has the right blend of common sense and ruthlesness to really make a difference.
Yea,its a shame the 'big hitters' on the center right couldn't settle their differences and work together to make changes that really matter.
Again,have to agree with you re Rupert Lowe.
In an ideal world, he'd run the show,he has the right blend of common sense and ruthlesness to really make a difference.
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1433
- Has liked: 257 times
- Been liked: 687 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Agreed Bill. If I had my way, I'd have Advance UK in, but it's not going to happen. I'm not expecting miracles from Reform, but at the very least some common sense ideas to running the country. Supporting businesses, working people, clearing out the hotels (£53 BILLION a year on security alone FFS) and scrapping Net Zero.
That would be a start.
That would be a start.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2679
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 669 times
- Been liked: 1043 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Its been said before but its worth saying again.
The BLOB will see to it that whatever policies Reform try to implement, the civil service will find a way of stalling/ignoring them. Any real change will only happen if a sledgehammer approach is taken and a massive clearout takes place.
The BLOB will see to it that whatever policies Reform try to implement, the civil service will find a way of stalling/ignoring them. Any real change will only happen if a sledgehammer approach is taken and a massive clearout takes place.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5525
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 104 times
- Been liked: 796 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I agree.
I've said many times that I feel it's an election too soon for them to take power. I still feel this even if they bring in people with experience of governing (albeit very badly) the country.
They still need to be getting their undercurrent of direction out to the people/voters and acting on any feedback; they need to be seen as the party that listens because all (ALL) previous governments have demonstrated that they're weapons-grade past-masters at ignoring what the public want and giving what they need the public to want (to keep themselves in power).
I've said many times that I feel it's an election too soon for them to take power. I still feel this even if they bring in people with experience of governing (albeit very badly) the country.
They still need to be getting their undercurrent of direction out to the people/voters and acting on any feedback; they need to be seen as the party that listens because all (ALL) previous governments have demonstrated that they're weapons-grade past-masters at ignoring what the public want and giving what they need the public to want (to keep themselves in power).
