AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Crapaqueta
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1524
- Been liked: 369 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Oh and all this after the club supported him bollocks..
The club were protecting their valuable asset who had done nothing wrong, it's not like he did something and they supported him, it was in the club's interest not to lose an at the time £85million asset.
The club were protecting their valuable asset who had done nothing wrong, it's not like he did something and they supported him, it was in the club's interest not to lose an at the time £85million asset.
Re: Crapaqueta
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 07:59fraser wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 01:39GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 20:36What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.I’m not getting this argument, if the FA have caused the (alleged ) mental suffering surely he’d feel better by attacking the ones who caused the problem as soon as he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. Not just accepting the hurt dished out by people at the FA, up sticks and go to Brazil, best therapy is teaching them a lesson, no?
Because seeking revenge and getting stuck in legal battles for more years, when it was the pressure of it all causing him anxiety... So of course he wouldn't want to, who would I wouldn't. Life is too short and he's hated it why would you volunteer for more of the same, the best therapy isn't teaching them a lesson it's letting it go... I bet you couldn't find a professional anywhere that would recommend the path your suggesting as a way to get over it.
-
GBHammer63
- Posts: 478
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 137 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 01:39GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 20:36fraser wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 17:11That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.
I’m not getting this argument, if the FA have caused the (alleged ) mental suffering surely he’d feel better by attacking the ones who caused the problem as soon as he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. Not just accepting the hurt dished out by people at the FA, up sticks and go to Brazil, best therapy is teaching them a lesson, no?
Re: Crapaqueta
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 20:36fraser wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 17:11GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 16:11For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
If something fucks you up mentally you change what's fucked you up mentally, you don't double down and do more of it. So not carrying on doing the thing which caused the damage isn't proof that there wasn't any done.
-
Any Old Iron
- Posts: 714
- Old WHO Number: 10365
- Has liked: 401 times
- Been liked: 197 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I’m very pleased to see the back of this cսnt. I think his behaviour this season has been disgusting, particularly in view of all the support he got from the club during the betting investigation. I lost patience with the self centered git after his disgraceful antics in the Liverpool game.
The bloke was poison and the team will be better without him.
The bloke was poison and the team will be better without him.
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 1045
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 651 times
- Been liked: 453 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Fuuuuuuuuuuucking hell.
When the fuck did we invade the argies?
Think you'd be better off on a Celtic forum, fenian cսnt.
When the fuck did we invade the argies?
Think you'd be better off on a Celtic forum, fenian cսnt.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8548
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
What was troubling him once he'd been officially cleared in the Summer before the season got under way and was then seen chucking imaginary mobiles away beaming like a Cheshire cսnt once he scored a penalty up at the City Ground? Or was promptly leaving this January really more to do with continually playing dogshit deep in a relegation battle he hadn't the stomach for? That also coincided with a public embarrassing display from behaving like a spoilt child getting himself needlessly sent off against Liverpool on the same day of the sad passing of a true West Ham Great of all fucking days.. Don't buy it for a second. The timing of it all stinks.
He only ever thinks about himself and left us right in the lurch when the Club needed him most, practically begged him to stay (including Nuno) till the end of the season after all the Club had done supporting him through his highly suspicious betting scandal in the Stands as well as behind the scenes.
The Club were clearly let down by him with their response which says something in itself being as damning as it was saying thanks for nothing, pal.
He only ever thinks about himself and left us right in the lurch when the Club needed him most, practically begged him to stay (including Nuno) till the end of the season after all the Club had done supporting him through his highly suspicious betting scandal in the Stands as well as behind the scenes.
The Club were clearly let down by him with their response which says something in itself being as damning as it was saying thanks for nothing, pal.
-
GBHammer63
- Posts: 478
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 137 times
Re: Crapaqueta
fraser wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 17:11GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 16:11Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
What so these footballers with massive self belief who have struggled hard to get where they are who’ve had bigger struggles when they are skint, when pushed they want to go home? Not to have nothing to do with football but to play for a different football team when it wasn’t the team that caused the problem?
Re: Crapaqueta
GBHammer63 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 16:11Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
That makes no sense at all, so what you're saying is if it's seriously taken a massive toll on him all the scrutiny and court cases the way to make him self feel better and recover isn't going home having a fresh start and putting it all behind him, but no the way to recover mentally from 2 years of it is to engage himself in it for what would probably be the rest of his career.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
But he just wants to play football get away from it and put it behind him, that sounds way more logical if his mental health is suffering.
-
GBHammer63
- Posts: 478
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 229 times
- Been liked: 137 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.
For what it’s worth I absolutely agree, if it’s genuinely fucked Paqueta up mentally in either a major or minor way he should be standing his ground and going after the FA big time given his verdict not skulking away at the first opportunity and dressing it up as going home. Everyone is different but I’d have thought pretty much everyone would want retribution.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4546
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 1354 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I'd be tempted to. We don't owe the player anything now so if us digging for that puts him back in the shit, well then who fucking cares any longer?
It would be a very Sullivan thing to do as well. Moneygrab.
It would be a very Sullivan thing to do as well. Moneygrab.
-
Fortunes Hiding
- Posts: 88
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I think if you compare Tommy with Pacqueta.
Obviously different players. When Pacqueta had “ hurt” his back during a game …can’t remember who it was against, and Pacqueta goes down injured and referee waves play on, Pacqueta half gets up.
Would Tommy have done that? I remember one game where Tommy got a kick to the head , had a cut and still tried to head the ball.
Tommh will be remembered at West Ham long after we’ve stopped talking about Pacqueta.
Obviously different players. When Pacqueta had “ hurt” his back during a game …can’t remember who it was against, and Pacqueta goes down injured and referee waves play on, Pacqueta half gets up.
Would Tommy have done that? I remember one game where Tommy got a kick to the head , had a cut and still tried to head the ball.
Tommh will be remembered at West Ham long after we’ve stopped talking about Pacqueta.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4709
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 218 times
- Been liked: 612 times
Re: Crapaqueta
I wouldn't go as far as Rossal, and think the fee we got for him has possibly tempered the dislike/hate towards him. Add to that he's gone home (bless him) so it's not like he has joined another PL club.
However, what he is (was) is a massive drama queen, a man-child, and a one person soap opera, but he was never good enough to warrant such attention. Maradona, he most certainly isn't.
Do I wish him well? Nope. I'm just glad that he's down the road and the whole saga that follows him around is finally over.
The statement put out by the club says it all about how they feel about him, and on this occasion I would side with them.
However, what he is (was) is a massive drama queen, a man-child, and a one person soap opera, but he was never good enough to warrant such attention. Maradona, he most certainly isn't.
Do I wish him well? Nope. I'm just glad that he's down the road and the whole saga that follows him around is finally over.
The statement put out by the club says it all about how they feel about him, and on this occasion I would side with them.
Re: Crapaqueta
Paqueta is a cսnt end of.
We stood by him for years over the betting shit. Betting shit which seems to much of a massive coincidence not to have any truth of it. Years of underperforming, tantrums and suspensions whilst paying him a fortune and he can't even see the season out to try and get us out the mess he was part of creating.
'I never refused to play or ask to leave' What a load of bollocks that is. Saying that he has fell out of love with it etc, pathetic excuses. Could of shown a bit of loyalty and also could of been available while it was being sorted out.
An absolute rat, who given the fee we are getting, i'll drive him to the airport myself. Just hope he is replaced and will have a big smile on my face if he misses out on the world cup squad.
We stood by him for years over the betting shit. Betting shit which seems to much of a massive coincidence not to have any truth of it. Years of underperforming, tantrums and suspensions whilst paying him a fortune and he can't even see the season out to try and get us out the mess he was part of creating.
'I never refused to play or ask to leave' What a load of bollocks that is. Saying that he has fell out of love with it etc, pathetic excuses. Could of shown a bit of loyalty and also could of been available while it was being sorted out.
An absolute rat, who given the fee we are getting, i'll drive him to the airport myself. Just hope he is replaced and will have a big smile on my face if he misses out on the world cup squad.
-
dealcanvey
- Posts: 647
- Old WHO Number: 212132
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 132 times
Re: Crapaqueta
Can’t blame him for wanting to take his family home. Could have waited until the end of the season though. Does feel as if he has jumped a sinking ship as soon as possible.
great on his day which was about 3 games a season but most of the time he was a maverick. Was about him and him only rather than the team. We won’t miss him as we can’t afford to carry him in our situation.
great on his day which was about 3 games a season but most of the time he was a maverick. Was about him and him only rather than the team. We won’t miss him as we can’t afford to carry him in our situation.
Re: Crapaqueta
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 05:02 It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.
Then your hatred must have blinded you.. If you couldn't see what was right in front of your eyes, the crying against the cunts the breakdown when he got sent off... After 2 years of being persecuted you don't think that would get to him and it was all an act.
No need to answer it's a rhetorical question
Maybe Soucek was lying and just seeking attention it's not like he's been through what Paqueta has... I don't actually think that but how typical of you that a player you love comes out with it and you're full of sympathy and admiration... One you dislike does and he's lying and making it up..
Same goes for Sullivan and the club don't trust him he's lying..
It's Paqueta... Must be him can't be Sullivan
No need to answer it's a rhetorical question
Maybe Soucek was lying and just seeking attention it's not like he's been through what Paqueta has... I don't actually think that but how typical of you that a player you love comes out with it and you're full of sympathy and admiration... One you dislike does and he's lying and making it up..
Same goes for Sullivan and the club don't trust him he's lying..
It's Paqueta... Must be him can't be Sullivan
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8548
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4969 times
- Been liked: 2669 times
Re: Crapaqueta
It's because I don't believe a word of it conveniently hiding behind mental health that fucks me off about him when it suits, just as I don't believe he had nothing to do with the betting scandal.
Re: Crapaqueta
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 21:03simons wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:54 No animosity, but I’m only interested in players who want to play for us.
Mental elf is an easy cop out nowadays. Not that it might not be true, but It’s literally a free pass for being a bit of a cսnt in any walk of life.
Souček will never have the quality that Paquetá undoubtedly has, but he’s twice the man he’ll ever be, and I’m much happier seeing him pull on a shirt, with a smile on his face, even if he’s battling his own demons too.
Note to club : stay away from South Americans in the future. They’re generally agg in the long run.
And Souceks mental health is well documented now although at the time he was struggling he kept it to himself and never used as an excuse during that period or use it as an excuse to get away from the Club. If anything he used it to inspire him to do better and to come back fighting. Like you say, twice the man than Paqueta.
Someone coping with their mental health differently to someone else makes him less of a man?
There's a thread at the top of this forum maybe you should read it and stop being a cսnt, go and tell some of them how they're not a man.
Seriously for someone who doesn't rate him at all you're very bitter about him and can hardly post anything without mentioning him
Now if Kilman was accused of refusing to play I'd be delighted and grateful I wouldn't be making constant bitter posts about him I'd just be relieved he's gone now..
There's a thread at the top of this forum maybe you should read it and stop being a cսnt, go and tell some of them how they're not a man.
Seriously for someone who doesn't rate him at all you're very bitter about him and can hardly post anything without mentioning him
Now if Kilman was accused of refusing to play I'd be delighted and grateful I wouldn't be making constant bitter posts about him I'd just be relieved he's gone now..
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2372
- Has liked: 1536 times
- Been liked: 815 times
Re: Crapaqueta
smartypants wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 19:36 We all just need to remember that he was off to City 2 years ago, if he’d had his way.
This
Re: Crapaqueta
Imagine hating the English but loving an English football team and always cunting off it's English fans
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2372
- Has liked: 1536 times
- Been liked: 815 times