AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
US Politics Thread
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 1973
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 393 times
- Been liked: 936 times
US Politics Thread
Seems like the main politics thread is becoming a Yankee-Doodle Trump-fest, so maybe scope here to split them out.
Will see if this one gains any traction ..if it does will move over a few of the million posts from our two protagonists from the other thread.
Yee-haaa!
Will see if this one gains any traction ..if it does will move over a few of the million posts from our two protagonists from the other thread.
Yee-haaa!
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
XKhammer wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 12:26goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 10:04Council Scum" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:59At what point do you decide you are sick of having terrorist attacks on your own soil and retaliate?Which terror attacks on US soil have Iran been responsible for?
They did retaliate by invading Iraq and Afghanistan and that did not go well. "No more foreign wars" was the message Trump was elected on.Iran, specifically through its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), extensively funds, trains, and arms several militant groups across the Middle East to expand its regional influence and pressure rivals. Major groups supported include Lebanon's Hezbollah, Gaza-based Hamas and Palestinian Islamic JihadHouthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria.
Anyone else here think goosestep is a mouthpiece for the mad mullahs
"several militant groups across the Middle East"
there's your answer.
you need to do a better job trying to cut & past from chat GPT joyo son.
there's your answer.
you need to do a better job trying to cut & past from chat GPT joyo son.
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 10:04Council Scum" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:59At what point do you decide you are sick of having terrorist attacks on your own soil and retaliate?Which terror attacks on US soil have Iran been responsible for?
They did retaliate by invading Iraq and Afghanistan and that did not go well. "No more foreign wars" was the message Trump was elected on.
Iran, specifically through its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), extensively funds, trains, and arms several militant groups across the Middle East to expand its regional influence and pressure rivals. Major groups supported include Lebanon's Hezbollah, Gaza-based Hamas and Palestinian Islamic JihadHouthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria.
Anyone else here think goosestep is a mouthpiece for the mad mullahs
Anyone else here think goosestep is a mouthpiece for the mad mullahs
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8230
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4790 times
- Been liked: 2559 times
Re: US Politics Thread
No great surprise. Just air defence systems kicking in automatically with no lives lost.
-
Westham67
- Posts: 1216
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 398 times
- Been liked: 145 times
- Contact:
Re: US Politics Thread
The war on terrorism 2021 to 2021 then the Hamas attacks on Israel 2003 only two years after a 20 years of a war on terrorism so what happens ever happens with Iran wont make a difference, The Sunni Wahhabism is the source of the terrorism ISIS and Al Qaeda Saudi and the UAE (Arabs) .Iranians are Persians and Shia Muslims, There is the Persian Gulf of the Gulf of Arabia
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Council Scum" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:59goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:47Council Scum" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:36US embassy bombing 1983
US Marine bombing 1983
US Embassy bombing 1984
Hijacking of TWA airlines by Hezbollah 1985And do you think the number and scale of Islamist terror attacks has gone up or down since the invasion of Iraq?
at what point do you stop getting involved in a region which culturally and historically doesn't want you getting involved?At what point do you decide you are sick of having terrorist attacks on your own soil and retaliate?
Which terror attacks on US soil have Iran been responsible for?
They did retaliate by invading Iraq and Afghanistan and that did not go well. "No more foreign wars" was the message Trump was elected on.
They did retaliate by invading Iraq and Afghanistan and that did not go well. "No more foreign wars" was the message Trump was elected on.
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 770
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 277 times
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:47Council Scum" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:36US embassy bombing 1983
US Marine bombing 1983
US Embassy bombing 1984
Hijacking of TWA airlines by Hezbollah 1985And do you think the number and scale of Islamist terror attacks has gone up or down since the invasion of Iraq?
at what point do you stop getting involved in a region which culturally and historically doesn't want you getting involved?
At what point do you decide you are sick of having terrorist attacks on your own soil and retaliate?
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Council Scum" wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 09:36US embassy bombing 1983
US Marine bombing 1983
US Embassy bombing 1984
Hijacking of TWA airlines by Hezbollah 1985
And do you think the number and scale of Islamist terror attacks has gone up or down since the invasion of Iraq?
at what point do you stop getting involved in a region which culturally and historically doesn't want you getting involved?
at what point do you stop getting involved in a region which culturally and historically doesn't want you getting involved?
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 770
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 277 times
Re: US Politics Thread
US embassy bombing 1983
US Marine bombing 1983
US Embassy bombing 1984
Hijacking of TWA airlines by Hezbollah 1985
US Marine bombing 1983
US Embassy bombing 1984
Hijacking of TWA airlines by Hezbollah 1985
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
The first gulf war was 1990 and started a pathway to 9/11. Bin Laden said as much.
and how have things gone since the second Iraq war and invasion of Afghanistan? Do you think they've got better or worse?
and how have things gone since the second Iraq war and invasion of Afghanistan? Do you think they've got better or worse?
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 770
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 277 times
Re: US Politics Thread
World trade centre bombing 1993
CIA Head quarters shooting 1993
Brooklyn Bridge shooting 191994
Bojinka Plot 1995 (Foiled)
Empire States Building bombiing 1997 (Foiled)
Riyadh Bombing 1995 on Us Military
CIA Head quarters shooting 1993
Brooklyn Bridge shooting 191994
Bojinka Plot 1995 (Foiled)
Empire States Building bombiing 1997 (Foiled)
Riyadh Bombing 1995 on Us Military
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 06:29Nutsin wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 03:24goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:24They wouldn’t be dead if this ‘war’ hadn’t started. What happened to no more foreign wars?
The US’s own intelligence said that Iran was not actively pursuing a bomb and was years away from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Day 1 of this war and the USA had a terror attack on its own soil.Only a total cսnt would blame a president for what a terrorist did to innocent people.
So who was to blame for the bombing at a kids concert in Manchester?
You don’t think UK or US foreign policy has any part to play?
How many terrorist attacks were there pre Iraq?
9/11???
-
Westham67
- Posts: 1216
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 398 times
- Been liked: 145 times
- Contact:
-
Westham67
- Posts: 1216
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 398 times
- Been liked: 145 times
- Contact:
Re: US Politics Thread
The Manchester bomber was removed from Libya by the UK government on a British warship as a privileged refugee
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Nutsin wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 03:24goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:24Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:19
It's war, casualties are always highly likely, you can't be that naive to think there wouldn't be any? The devastation of their Regime Epic Fure Operation itself is what's so impressive. To destroy so much of their top command, nuclear and missile capability since last June to now is going to neuter them long term for the betterment of everyone.
You would have preferred the old Islamic Rep Regime to exist continuing on with their proxy wars and terror?They wouldn’t be dead if this ‘war’ hadn’t started. What happened to no more foreign wars?
The US’s own intelligence said that Iran was not actively pursuing a bomb and was years away from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Day 1 of this war and the USA had a terror attack on its own soil.Only a total cսnt would blame a president for what a terrorist did to innocent people.
So who was to blame for the bombing at a kids concert in Manchester?
You don’t think UK or US foreign policy has any part to play?
How many terrorist attacks were there pre Iraq?
How many terrorist attacks were there pre Iraq?
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:59goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:13Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:07
Botched by different Administrations for a start although the problem for all the region was the Iranian sponsored input to destabilising it all, hence why this is so important in strangling Irans capability to continue their terror once and for all. What's noticeable is allies in the Region are preferring to back the US on going ahead with it rather than siding with the Islamic Rep Regime because they too also realise how destabilising they are. Many who don't support them are sick and tired of the same old evil Regime and like many (if not yourself) across the world as well as in the entire region there welcomes it.
They also had their chance after chance after chance to play ball with America who were willing to come to table but alas they had no intention for genuine diplomacy and instead continue on waging their wars by proxy. Long overdue and more than happy to see it being followed through after making such a significant targetted impact last year.So is it regime change to free the people or is it about nuclear capability?
Both, which only goes to show how important this all is, for all of us.
The US intelligence contradicts the second point.
The first point we’ve been here before with many other countries and it’s never worked out well. Why is this time going to be different?
The first point we’ve been here before with many other countries and it’s never worked out well. Why is this time going to be different?
- goose
- Posts: 6258
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 565 times
- Been liked: 1098 times
Re: US Politics Thread
Nutsin wrote: ↑02 Mar 2026, 03:45OK_Guy wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:31both would be good for the people of Iran & the World... would you not agree the World would be a safer place?
when you consider the Israelis have lived under daily threat from not only Iran but their proxies as well (Hamas, Hezbollah & Houthi's) for decades and, the people of Iran get murdered in their ten's of thousands if they protest against the regime. By your previous comments one would believe that you would prefer the status quo, killing of Iranians & Jews must be ok in your book.
Goose wants to wait until Iran becomes an imminent threat of nuclear war. Let that sink in! That’s what you are arguing with.
If that’s the issue why haven’t the US been bombing North Korea?
Re: US Politics Thread
OK_Guy wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:31both would be good for the people of Iran & the World... would you not agree the World would be a safer place?
when you consider the Israelis have lived under daily threat from not only Iran but their proxies as well (Hamas, Hezbollah & Houthi's) for decades and, the people of Iran get murdered in their ten's of thousands if they protest against the regime. By your previous comments one would believe that you would prefer the status quo, killing of Iranians & Jews must be ok in your book.
Goose wants to wait until Iran becomes an imminent threat of nuclear war. Let that sink in! That’s what you are arguing with.
Re: US Politics Thread
A week in Pattaya for me and the Mrs, managed luckily to book flights Sunday on Eva. No seats available now for quite a few days and flights were going for silly money. We did OK got ours for normal price.. Mrs has to take a week's unpaid leave though... But the weather is nice and the beers are cheap..
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:24Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:19
It's war, casualties are always highly likely, you can't be that naive to think there wouldn't be any? The devastation of their Regime Epic Fure Operation itself is what's so impressive. To destroy so much of their top command, nuclear and missile capability since last June to now is going to neuter them long term for the betterment of everyone.
You would have preferred the old Islamic Rep Regime to exist continuing on with their proxy wars and terror?They wouldn’t be dead if this ‘war’ hadn’t started. What happened to no more foreign wars?
The US’s own intelligence said that Iran was not actively pursuing a bomb and was years away from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Day 1 of this war and the USA had a terror attack on its own soil.
Only a total cսnt would blame a president for what a terrorist did to innocent people.
So who was to blame for the bombing at a kids concert in Manchester?
So who was to blame for the bombing at a kids concert in Manchester?
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:37Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:27 Third and final time I ask, you would have preferred the Status Quo?Absolutely. As would the families of the 3 dead soldiers & the people killed in Texas today.
Iran wasn’t a threat to Europe or the US.
Has there been any recent examples of regime changes in the Middle East which have gone well?
Since when have you cared about the victims?
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 20:44Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 20:32
It's not the same situation. Conflicts in the past were never going to make material change in the region like crushing this one. This is the head of the beast which needed toppling the most.The entire point of Afghanistan was to topple the Taliban - and look who ended up replacing them.
There's dozens of other crazy Islamic clerics lined up to take over......... are you happy to commit troops into Iran to oversee change to the 'right' one?
Actually the entire point of Afghanistan was its mineral wealth. They have an abundance of lithium, iron ore and rare earths and others. They have been labelled the Saudi Arabia of minerals, they’d be a very rich country if we could get our hands on it.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8230
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4790 times
- Been liked: 2559 times
Re: US Politics Thread
goose wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:13Massive Attack" wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:07
Botched by different Administrations for a start although the problem for all the region was the Iranian sponsored input to destabilising it all, hence why this is so important in strangling Irans capability to continue their terror once and for all. What's noticeable is allies in the Region are preferring to back the US on going ahead with it rather than siding with the Islamic Rep Regime because they too also realise how destabilising they are. Many who don't support them are sick and tired of the same old evil Regime and like many (if not yourself) across the world as well as in the entire region there welcomes it.
They also had their chance after chance after chance to play ball with America who were willing to come to table but alas they had no intention for genuine diplomacy and instead continue on waging their wars by proxy. Long overdue and more than happy to see it being followed through after making such a significant targetted impact last year.So is it regime change to free the people or is it about nuclear capability?
Both, which only goes to show how important this all is, for all of us.
Re: US Politics Thread
both would be good for the people of Iran & the World... would you not agree the World would be a safer place?
when you consider the Israelis have lived under daily threat from not only Iran but their proxies as well (Hamas, Hezbollah & Houthi's) for decades and, the people of Iran get murdered in their ten's of thousands if they protest against the regime. By your previous comments one would believe that you would prefer the status quo, killing of Iranians & Jews must be ok in your book.
when you consider the Israelis have lived under daily threat from not only Iran but their proxies as well (Hamas, Hezbollah & Houthi's) for decades and, the people of Iran get murdered in their ten's of thousands if they protest against the regime. By your previous comments one would believe that you would prefer the status quo, killing of Iranians & Jews must be ok in your book.