AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
A.Villa v West Ham United
A.Villa v West Ham United
Massive match Sunday and we need to take something but a win will take and keep us out of the bottom three.
Hopefully Summerville is back and if he is just one decision for Nuno to make and that is which of the centre backs misses out... Really tough decision for him as Disasi has been great since arriving, Dinos and Todibo were both outstanding against City.
If Summerville isn't fit I'm guessing he'll go for another midfielder and hope he does as I'd prefer not to go three at the back again.
Hopefully Summerville is back and if he is just one decision for Nuno to make and that is which of the centre backs misses out... Really tough decision for him as Disasi has been great since arriving, Dinos and Todibo were both outstanding against City.
If Summerville isn't fit I'm guessing he'll go for another midfielder and hope he does as I'd prefer not to go three at the back again.
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
honky cat" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 14:18 Id rather push Diouf forward if Jimmy's out, than have that monster inflatable anywhere near it.
I think Pablo, only got taken off last week as he was coming back from that injury.
If Jimmy's out I expect they'll start same as v Man City
Wouldnt be against this and playing Mayers LB. He has looked solid and think they play Bailey or Buendia wide right who he is capable of taking care of
-
honky cat
- Posts: 1815
- Has liked: 1067 times
- Been liked: 732 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Id rather push Diouf forward if Jimmy's out, than have that monster inflatable anywhere near it.
I think Pablo, only got taken off last week as he was coming back from that injury.
If Jimmy's out I expect they'll start same as v Man City
I think Pablo, only got taken off last week as he was coming back from that injury.
If Jimmy's out I expect they'll start same as v Man City
-
Leonard Hatred
- Posts: 2765
- Old WHO Number: 209880
- Has liked: 194 times
- Been liked: 297 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
WE WILL DEFEAT ASTON VILLA BY TWO GOALS TO ONE.
YOU CAN TAKE THAT STRAIGHT TO THE BANK.
STAND ON ME.
YOU CAN TAKE THAT STRAIGHT TO THE BANK.
STAND ON ME.
-
honky cat
- Posts: 1815
- Has liked: 1067 times
- Been liked: 732 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
fraser wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 09:42Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide leftI thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 2631
- Has liked: 222 times
- Been liked: 435 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
stubbo wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 13:02 The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make. CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.
It's a tough call.
Not like @Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
Fucking hell son, rent free or what.
Fwiw, how many people you see putting Potts in their predicted lineups these days? He's been shown to be utter gash.
Fwiw, how many people you see putting Potts in their predicted lineups these days? He's been shown to be utter gash.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 1365
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 744 times
- Been liked: 343 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 12:17 Personally, I'd play Todibo right back instead of the give away a goal a game AWB. The top teams do it a lot with CB's, Arsenal are gonna win the league doing it. Gives us more stability, bit more arieally, and we won't be constantly targeted there. I also think he's quick enough and good on the ball to get forward at times, and he'll be over their winger like a rash.
That's a good shout, Todibo is also pretty good with the ball as well. I like AWB but he has been at fault for goals quite a lot this season.
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
stubbo wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 13:02 The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make. CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.
It's a tough call.
Not like @Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
Just seen he has and Scarles got the treatment lower down!
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make. CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.
It's a tough call.
Not like Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
It's a tough call.
Not like Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8504
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4951 times
- Been liked: 2660 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Can't shift out Mavropanos after that obscene herculean effort. 1st name on the team sheet! 
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1432
- Has liked: 256 times
- Been liked: 685 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Personally, I'd play Todibo right back instead of the give away a goal a game AWB. The top teams do it a lot with CB's, Arsenal are gonna win the league doing it. Gives us more stability, bit more arieally, and we won't be constantly targeted there. I also think he's quick enough and good on the ball to get forward at times, and he'll be over their winger like a rash.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4531
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 1346 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Manuel wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:39El Scorchio" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:24Not sure we could, for the absolute pittance we paid. We didn't even use our second loan slot in the end after sending Igor back. That tells a story about the state of things.Possibly, think he's on 70k. There is always someone out there, christ even Lingard would have been better, but yea fair shout on the second loan slot.
Agree on the wages but I suppose that's the going rate now mad as it is- especially when you're desperate. The deal at least was 1 mill and then fuck all obligation if we go down which is good as we wouldn't be lumbered in the champ. I don't remember if there were any obligations if we stay up, though. The option of an extra year? Which I should think we wouldn't take. It is at least better than deals we've made in the past where from desperation we've signed similar players at similar situations and been stuck with them for 3-5 years. Hello Danny Ings, Luis Boa Morte and a truck load of others! I guess there was no-one better for that sort of favourable deal who was willing to come to a club who looked certs for relegation at the time.
I'm certainly not going to pretend he's made an impact at all aside from that first half against Brentford, but at least we can cut ties quickly and easily at the end of the season.
I'm certainly not going to pretend he's made an impact at all aside from that first half against Brentford, but at least we can cut ties quickly and easily at the end of the season.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 8504
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4951 times
- Been liked: 2660 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Think it will be a draw and be happy enough with that but my god if we win it it'll turbo charge our survival chances and set us up nicely to stay up.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4689
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 215 times
- Been liked: 605 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
El Scorchio" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:24Not sure we could, for the absolute pittance we paid. We didn't even use our second loan slot in the end after sending Igor back. That tells a story about the state of things.
Possibly, think he's on 70k. There is always someone out there, christ even Lingard would have been better, but yea fair shout on the second loan slot.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1474
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 106 times
- Been liked: 331 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Yes, absolutely massive game and we are due a win at Villa.
They are on an awful run of form and still have loads of key players out injured. It's about time we bloody did them!
They are on an awful run of form and still have loads of key players out injured. It's about time we bloody did them!
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 3018
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 129 times
- Been liked: 707 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Stop Rogers, stop Villa.
Simple as that.
At our place he was the difference between the 2 sides.
Simple as that.
At our place he was the difference between the 2 sides.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4531
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 1346 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Manuel wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:12fraser wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 09:42Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide leftI thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked.He is quickly running out of time now to justify all the 'fuss' Nuno made with him, in fact I've almost given up on him being of much use at this point. Not a big deal financially, but we could have brought someone else in instead.
Not sure we could, for the absolute pittance we paid. We didn't even use our second loan slot in the end after sending Igor back. That tells a story about the state of things.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4531
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 272 times
- Been liked: 1346 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
We need more attacking impetus against Villa than we did against City, and their midfield being their strength, we need to get more in there to counter it particularly if they have players coming back from injury. (Just our luck if so)
Two at the back, and then pop Summerville back in if he's fit, if he's not then it's either Traore (although I suspect he'll be kept for later in the game) or an extra CM. It's a real shame we don't have that natural 10/AM player.
Two at the back, and then pop Summerville back in if he's fit, if he's not then it's either Traore (although I suspect he'll be kept for later in the game) or an extra CM. It's a real shame we don't have that natural 10/AM player.
-
Council Scum
- Posts: 785
- Old WHO Number: 19891
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 287 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Manuel wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:14stubbo-admin wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:09 I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.
It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).
Mavropanos was our best player last game. Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable. And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.
I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.
My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).Fwiw, if he did leave a CB out I fancy it would be Todibo.
Agreed
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
stubbo-admin wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:09 I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.
It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).
Mavropanos was our best player last game. Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable. And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.
I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.
My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
If Jimmy is fit he has to start, when Taty and Pablo are pressing from the front is when he needs to be on the pitch to take advantage of the chaos especially as he will still be match fit it would only be 2 weeks
- Manuel
- Posts: 4689
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 215 times
- Been liked: 605 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
stubbo-admin wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 10:09 I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.
It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).
Mavropanos was our best player last game. Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable. And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.
I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.
My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
Fwiw, if he did leave a CB out I fancy it would be Todibo.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4689
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 215 times
- Been liked: 605 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
fraser wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 09:42Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide leftI thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked.
He is quickly running out of time now to justify all the 'fuss' Nuno made with him, in fact I've almost given up on him being of much use at this point. Not a big deal financially, but we could have brought someone else in instead.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 2013
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 404 times
- Been liked: 963 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
I think this is a tricky selection, whether Summerville is available or not.
It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).
Mavropanos was our best player last game. Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable. And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.
I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.
My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
It could be argued the centre backs (all three of them) are currently our form players, and anyone we bring in will be inferior to them (Traore, Lamadrid, Kante, Wilson, etc).
Mavropanos was our best player last game. Disasi has been our best player in recent times in defence and is undroppable. And Todibo replaced Mavropanos twoleague games ago.
I like others would like to see Summerville back in, and 2 at the back...but it becoes very hard to know who to leave out.
My guess is even if Summerville is back, he'll start from the bench ("coming back from injury") and we'll start with a 3 at the back setup (same line up as last game).
- Manuel
- Posts: 4689
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 215 times
- Been liked: 605 times
Re: A.Villa v West Ham United
Massive game, with one eye on the other fixture too. I agree that he won't go 3 at the back again regardless of Jimmy, we have to go for the win here, running out of games. I also wouldn't be shocked if Wilson gets a start.
