Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

A.Villa v West Ham United

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3383
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 689 times

Villa A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

Massive match Sunday and we need to take something but a win will take and keep us out of the bottom three. 

Hopefully Summerville is back and if he is just one decision for Nuno to make and that is which of the centre backs misses out... Really tough decision for him as Disasi has been great since arriving, Dinos and Todibo were both outstanding against City. 

If Summerville isn't fit I'm guessing he'll go for another midfielder and hope he does as I'd prefer not to go three at the back again. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3383
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 689 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

BoleynGone wrote: 20 Mar 2026, 09:13 It was easier for us to get a point at home against City,having just got thumped by Real, than for us to win at 4th Placed,Q/F of EL  Aston Villa.
It's fucking simple Fraser you dork.
We'll get a point,just.but if we sit back and allow Villa to shoot then we won't even get a point.
We have the players to get a point but not if Nuno goes to negative,there's no way we be able to do the same again. Mavro won't have a face left...
So as usual with you it's contradiction form doesn't matter until it suits you.. So because City lost to multiple times European champions Real Madrid it makes it easier than Villa who beat a bang average French side. Leeds drew at Villa, Brentford won at Villa, Chelsea thrashed Villa at Villa but they're harder to get a point against than Man City who regularly thrash us.. Go have a look at the bookies odds for both fixtures and I guarantee you that the odds for a draw against City were longer than the odds for a draw against Villa... Your logic is all over the place

Just looked we're 3/1 to beat Villa we were longer to beat City ... Villa aren't even odds on to win they're just over evens

Oh and you didn't say a win would be harder than a point at home you said 

A point here will be great,harder than against City.
BoleynGone
Posts: 319
Has liked: 119 times
Been liked: 57 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post BoleynGone »

It was easier for us to get a point at home against City,having just got thumped by Real, than for us to win at 4th Placed,Q/F of EL  Aston Villa.
It's fucking simple Fraser you dork.
We'll get a point,just.but if we sit back and allow Villa to shoot then we won't even get a point.
We have the players to get a point but not if Nuno goes to negative,there's no way we be able to do the same again. Mavro won't have a face left...
the exile
Posts: 483
Old WHO Number: 15875
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 23 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post the exile »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 12:17 Personally, I'd play Todibo right back instead of the give away a goal a game AWB. The top teams do it a lot with CB's, Arsenal are gonna win the league doing it. Gives us more stability, bit more arieally, and we won't be constantly targeted there. I also think he's quick enough and good on the ball to get forward at times, and he'll be over their winger like a rash.
Totally agree - really good shout. Makes sense tactically and makes good use of players in form. An extra threat at set pieces too, attack and defence, which could be invaluable.
scott_d
Posts: 727
Location: Essex
Old WHO Number: 11453
Has liked: 54 times
Been liked: 166 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post scott_d »

fuck Villa, on a run of the worst form they've been in for a while, a big contrast to when we played them last when they were in the best form they've probably ever had and we were still shit.

We owe them a beating.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3383
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 689 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

Manuel wrote: 20 Mar 2026, 07:27
fraser wrote: 20 Mar 2026, 07:23 Harder than city? 

They've won one of their last eight league games 3 league defeats on the bounce. 
You really are into past form recently, rolling out stats all the while. Just saying.
Well yes as it makes them definitely not a harder game than City now when we played them when they were on their run of 12 wins or whatever it was and they were flying and we were doing the opposite it was a massive ask and they beat us then but they weren't that good. 

It's not past form it's current form, Wolves are bottom and playing really well so you also have to take in how they're playing in their last 5 they've drawn with Arsenal beat Villa and Liverpool and drawn with Brentford so you wouldn't say they were an easy game because they're bottom. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8514
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4954 times
Been liked: 2662 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Massive Attack »

All considered this is a good fixture to have at just the right time. We need to capitalise on it. Be very disappointed wirh a loss having done most of the hard work getting to this point. We can definitely get a decent result out of this and really hoping we can win it which is very possible. Poor League form coupled with less rest because of Europe as we've had plenty can make all the difference, especially after our confidence boosting draw against City as well.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4705
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 218 times
Been liked: 612 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Manuel »

fraser wrote: 20 Mar 2026, 07:23 Harder than city? 

They've won one of their last eight league games 3 league defeats on the bounce. 
You really are into past form recently, rolling out stats all the while. Just saying.
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1371
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 747 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Tomshardware »

They will have had less than 3 day rest, we will have had nearly 8. We need to make it count. I agree with Boleyn this will be a tough game.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3383
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 689 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

Harder than city? 

They've won one of their last eight league games 3 league defeats on the bounce. 
BoleynGone
Posts: 319
Has liked: 119 times
Been liked: 57 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post BoleynGone »

Villa rested quite a few, expect Mings,Cash and Konsa to start in defence.Watkins and Buendi too. Harvey Elliot must have triggered the permanent clause now,very strange use of him. He'll surely be an option to replace Rogers more often if required.
A point here will be great,harder than against City.They'll be buoyant and now that 5th place has been secured as a CL place have two fronts for qualification there.
Need to start strong . Mavro assist 1-1 
wingdamage
Posts: 55
Has liked: 41 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post wingdamage »

Hoping for Lille to score and extra time. They'll be knackered and if we start strong as we have been doing of late we can control the game. Wishful and doable. 
John Drake
Posts: 222
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post John Drake »

Villa’s poor form coincided with injuries to Tielemans, Kamara and McGinn. Only McGinn is back by now. On top of that Watkins has played like a donkey for most of the season and they only have Abrahams in reserve. The main threat will be Rogers – any chance of an injury tonight?
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3383
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 281 times
Been liked: 689 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post fraser »

nychammer wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 22:57 tough this one. What we wouldn't give for a win but a Villa side smarting from defeat against Man Utd and probably needing to win to keep CL qualification on track will be a tough prospect.  Think we'll play ok but realistically will be defeated 2-1 in this one. It's going to go to the wire......
They've lost 4 of their last 6 league games only Forest and Spurs are in worse form over the last 10... It isn't just Man U who have beaten them. 
nychammer
Posts: 2242
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 81 times
Been liked: 347 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post nychammer »

tough this one. What we wouldn't give for a win but a Villa side smarting from defeat against Man Utd and probably needing to win to keep CL qualification on track will be a tough prospect.  Think we'll play ok but realistically will be defeated 2-1 in this one. It's going to go to the wire......
Nutsin
Posts: 3685
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 268 times
Been liked: 444 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Nutsin »

I think we will come home with all 3 points. I’m going for a 2-0
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1990
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 357 times
Been liked: 311 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Mex Martillo »

If Summerville is fit it's back to our winning 4-4-2 for me.

Hermansen
Wan Bissaka, Mavropanos, Disasi, Diouf
Bowen, Soucek, Fernandes, Summerville
Tatty, Pablo

We can win this. Form says we should win this!
Rossal
Posts: 1012
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 25 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Rossal »

honky cat" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 14:18 Id rather push Diouf forward if Jimmy's out, than have that monster inflatable anywhere near it.

I think Pablo, only got taken off last week as he was coming back from that injury.

If Jimmy's out I expect they'll start same as v Man City 
Wouldnt be against this and playing Mayers LB.  He has looked solid and think they play Bailey or Buendia wide right who he is capable of taking care of 
honky cat
Posts: 1820
Has liked: 1069 times
Been liked: 733 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post honky cat »

Id rather push Diouf forward if Jimmy's out, than have that monster inflatable anywhere near it.

I think Pablo, only got taken off last week as he was coming back from that injury.

If Jimmy's out I expect they'll start same as v Man City 
Leonard Hatred
Posts: 2767
Old WHO Number: 209880
Has liked: 194 times
Been liked: 300 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Leonard Hatred »

WE WILL DEFEAT ASTON VILLA BY TWO GOALS TO ONE. 

YOU CAN TAKE THAT STRAIGHT TO THE BANK.

STAND ON ME. 
honky cat
Posts: 1820
Has liked: 1069 times
Been liked: 733 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post honky cat »

fraser wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:42
Takashi Miike" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 09:36 I agree, it worked for City but we need that extra body higher up the pitch. Fingers crossed for a Jimmy recovery, if not put the Sumo wide left
I thought he was fucking awful when he came on against City a short sprint then looked fucked. 
 
On that 'behind the scenes' film, he looked fucked by the time he reached the carpet, jogging from the dressing room. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2643
Has liked: 222 times
Been liked: 441 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Mad Ferret »

stubbo wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 13:02 The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make.  CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.

It's a tough call.

Not like @Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
Fucking hell son, rent free or what.

Fwiw, how many people you see putting Potts in their predicted lineups these days? He's been shown to be utter gash.
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1371
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 747 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Tomshardware »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 12:17 Personally, I'd play Todibo right back instead of the give away a goal a game AWB. The top teams do it a lot with CB's, Arsenal are gonna win the league doing it. Gives us more stability, bit more arieally, and we won't be constantly targeted there. I also think he's quick enough and good on the ball to get forward at times, and he'll be over their winger like a rash.
That's a good shout, Todibo is also pretty good with the ball as well.   I like AWB but he has been at fault for goals quite a lot this season.
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 667
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 195 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post stubbo »

stubbo wrote: 18 Mar 2026, 13:02 The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make.  CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.

It's a tough call.

Not like @Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
Just seen he has and Scarles got the treatment lower down! 
User avatar
stubbo
Posts: 667
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 195 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post stubbo »

The conversation about defence on this thread so far shows how difficult this call will be to make.  CBs at RB, Mavro out despite that performance, Mavro in but who to leave out.

It's a tough call.

Not like Mad Ferret not to have chimed in by now to suggest anything is fine as long as Potts isn't in the Club.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8514
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4954 times
Been liked: 2662 times

Re: A.Villa v West Ham United

Post Massive Attack »

Can't shift out Mavropanos after that obscene herculean effort. 1st name on the team sheet! 😆
Post Reply