I'm loving the new banners on the WHO page header

[eusebiovic]

Excellent work. 

That is all.

I drink my tea.

[Stickleback]

Wils - the irony of accusing Stickleback of fishing...

I mean't I hooked him. I was clearly joking in my post he replied to.

It was clearly a joke from the start but I'm very touchy about fishing. 

[Far Cough UKunt]

Banners, emojis, GIFs we've come a long way from ASCII art.

[Manuel]

It's sad that a long time poster like Sir Alf was abused and run off the site by some because he was too 'negative'. Rarely posts now.

Generally don’t like losing posters, but he’s no great loss.

The point is he was bullied off the site, which for me leaves a sour taste for a long-term WHO stalwart that never gave anyone any grief and enjoyed posting on here. 

[wils]

Wils - the irony of accusing Stickleback of fishing...

I mean't I hooked him. I was clearly joking in my post he replied to.

[Mad Ferret]

It's sad that a long time poster like Sir Alf was abused and run off the site by some because he was too 'negative'. Rarely posts now.

Generally don’t like losing posters, but he’s no great loss.

[The Mercernary]

Wils - the irony of accusing Stickleback of fishing...

[wils]

Everything that is wrong with the world is caused by optimists. 

It has been their fault up to now. But in future they will be responsible for everything that is right.

That is a wildly over-optimistic view not born out by history. 

[Stickleback]

Everything that is wrong with the world is caused by optimists. 

It has been their fault up to now. But in future they will be responsible for everything that is right.

That is a wildly over-optimistic view not born out by history. 

[wils]

Everything that is wrong with the world is caused by optimists. 

It has been their fault up to now. But in future they will be responsible for everything that is right.

[Stickleback]

Everything that is wrong with the world is caused by optimists. 

[Manuel]

I prefer his pessimistic approach than those that predict us to win every game then cսnt off others for not doing the same. 

Yep prefer his 'type' than a simple optimistic, the fucking cringebags.

[fraser]

Sir Alf is alright just been worn down into a pessimist by too many years of supporting West Ham. Gets way too much abuse and doesn't bite back.

I prefer his pessimistic approach than those that predict us to win every game then cսnt off others for not doing the same. 

[Gank]

He might not have left, he might still be halfway through typing out one of his enormous posts.

[Manuel]

It's sad that a long time poster like Sir Alf was abused and run off the site by some because he was too 'negative'. Rarely posts now.

[Mad Ferret]

Banners look good.

Now let’s get some more traffic to the site.

[Tomshardware]

Did you save the photo of Ged having a heart attack before you deleted it?

Was it on the previous banner?

It was on A previous banner, I expect Ged put it on there himself when the site became his vanity project. If you have a library of old banners I'll be able to tell you which one it is and draw a circle around his big red penfold head.

He once banned me when I said he looked like character Meggy from 'This is England'.

[Monsieur merde de cheval]

looks good

[Gank]

Did you save the photo of Ged having a heart attack before you deleted it?

Was it on the previous banner?

It was on A previous banner, I expect Ged put it on there himself when the site became his vanity project. If you have a library of old banners I'll be able to tell you which one it is and draw a circle around his big red penfold head.

[stubbo-admin]

As I stated. I visit and post on this site out of habit mainly. If the site suddenly closed I wouldn't lose any sleep over it and would quickly move on. This site is not my life and it's merely just a distraction for me.

If my visiting and posting on this site offends you, then that's your problem. Maybe seek some therapy regarding your obsession with a random person on an internet forum you don't know and have never met.

No it doesn't offend me it amuses me.. It's a forum, someone posts something then someone else responds to it. I think slagging it off at every given opportunity when others have put in their own time to keep it going makes you a rude cսnt. 

If you don't like people replying to you and giving their opinion, and if makes you cry don't give yours in the first place and there'll be nothing to reply to, you donut. 

I have never slagged off the site or the people responsible for building the new site. In fact I have commended them for their efforts building the new site many times in the past.

I simply pointed out that all this work is far too late given the old site was left to rot for many years to the extent that it was largely unusable - particularly on match days when it would regularly crash.

Whilst Wills claims the traffic is increasing etc, the fact is that still only about a dozen people regularly post on here and the site in moribund compared to places like Facebook, Kumb, BBC HYS, X etc.

And yes, I will likely move over to Kumb at some point. I continue to post on here though out of habit and I suppose a sense of loyalty.

48 posters today.  Just FYI. Daily average over the last 3 month...65+.

Not thousands, but not 12 either. And as Wils says it is growing...slowly but surely.

And we have plans to keep it growing. What we could really do with is people promoting the site on those other channels.  As forums go, from a function and features perspective this is pretty much as good as anything else out there or better now and getting better all the time.

We just need to re-spread the word. We have some plans in place to get back towards what it was at one point...the place to go for West Ham info....the space is very fragmented now with lots of different channels and mediums to consume.

We'll try and make this somewhere you can get the overview of all that stuff and then discuss it cohesively (instead of being fragmented all over the place)...but it's a process.

Will take time....but we're working on it.

As you were.

[MaryMillingtonsGhost]

I continue to post on here though out of habit and I suppose a sense of loyalty.

 

 

[Come On You Irons]

I called you an attention seeking whore actually, you post on a site most days while calling it shit and wishing it died, you're also a bit dim if you can't see that. You often dig people out (as we all do) but when anyone engages with you and disagrees they're a stalker. 
You have your  opinion of the site and were blunt I gave my blunt opinion of your blunt opinion. 
​​

As I stated. I visit and post on this site out of habit mainly. If the site suddenly closed I wouldn't lose any sleep over it and would quickly move on. This site is not my life and it's merely just a distraction for me.

If my visiting and posting on this site offends you, then that's your problem. Maybe seek some therapy regarding your obsession with a random person on an internet forum you don't know and have never met.

No it doesn't offend me it amuses me.. It's a forum, someone posts something then someone else responds to it. I think slagging it off at every given opportunity when others have put in their own time to keep it going makes you a rude cսnt. 

If you don't like people replying to you and giving their opinion, and if makes you cry don't give yours in the first place and there'll be nothing to reply to, you donut. 

I have never slagged off the site or the people responsible for building the new site. In fact I have commended them for their efforts building the new site many times in the past.

I simply pointed out that all this work is far too late given the old site was left to rot for many years to the extent that it was largely unusable - particularly on match days when it would regularly crash.

Whilst Wills claims the traffic is increasing etc, the fact is that still only about a dozen people regularly post on here and the site in moribund compared to places like Facebook, Kumb, BBC HYS, X etc.

And yes, I will likely move over to Kumb at some point. I continue to post on here though out of habit and I suppose a sense of loyalty.

[Massive Attack]

there's a site very suitable for cunts like you, begins with a K

 

Knobjockey.com ??

KarensRUs?

[MaryMillingtonsGhost]

there's a site very suitable for cunts like you, begins with a K

 

 

Knobjockey.com ??

[fraser]

Who have I abused? You're the one who abused me by calling me an "attention seeking cսnt". Oh the irony.

I called you an attention seeking whore actually, you post on a site most days while calling it shit and wishing it died, you're also a bit dim if you can't see that. You often dig people out (as we all do) but when anyone engages with you and disagrees they're a stalker. 
You have your  opinion of the site and were blunt I gave my blunt opinion of your blunt opinion. 
​​

As I stated. I visit and post on this site out of habit mainly. If the site suddenly closed I wouldn't lose any sleep over it and would quickly move on. This site is not my life and it's merely just a distraction for me.

If my visiting and posting on this site offends you, then that's your problem. Maybe seek some therapy regarding your obsession with a random person on an internet forum you don't know and have never met.

No it doesn't offend me it amuses me.. It's a forum, someone posts something then someone else responds to it. I think slagging it off at every given opportunity when others have put in their own time to keep it going makes you a rude cսnt. 

If you don't like people replying to you and giving their opinion, and if makes you cry don't give yours in the first place and there'll be nothing to reply to, you donut. 

[Come On You Irons]

Ha ha oddball stalkers, you spend your whole time on here picking holes in everything, the hard work Stubbo and Wil have put into resurrecting the site, thread titles lots of other stuff yet hate the place but can't help yourself abusing others. 

Yet when someone questions you they're a stalker, Come on You Can't see the Irony. 

Who have I abused? You're the one who abused me by calling me an "attention seeking cսnt". Oh the irony.

I called you an attention seeking whore actually, you post on a site most days while calling it shit and wishing it died, you're also a bit dim if you can't see that. You often dig people out (as we all do) but when anyone engages with you and disagrees they're a stalker. 
You have your  opinion of the site and were blunt I gave my blunt opinion of your blunt opinion. 
​​

As I stated. I visit and post on this site out of habit mainly. If the site suddenly closed I wouldn't lose any sleep over it and would quickly move on. This site is not my life and it's merely just a distraction for me.

If my visiting and posting on this site offends you, then that's your problem. Maybe seek some therapy regarding your obsession with a random person on an internet forum you don't know and have never met.