Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Eye ties

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2754
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 452 times

Eye ties

Post Mad Ferret »

Will they miss out on another WC? Forced to ET by Bosnia, and down to 10 🤞🏻

Also, Potter leads Sweden to the WC.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4641
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 285 times
Been liked: 1390 times

Re: Eye ties

Post El Scorchio »

Rossal wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 14:20 Can't be having Gordon LW. His form there for club and country has been atrocious for well over a year.  
It's really not very dissimilar to Rashford's with the caveat Rashford plays for Barcelona with a spell at a relatively high flying Villa after being frozen out for being a cock at Man U and Gordon only plays for Newcastle but hasn't caused any issues at all. Gordon is younger and more reliable.

There's not loads between them but I'd rather have Gordon, especially with a less reliable player on the right flank.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8771
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 5092 times
Been liked: 2739 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Massive Attack »

If you look at it, quite a few players have been out of form but little other options. Pickford, Kane, O'Reilly, Rogers have hit regular form but many including Bowen have been off it. Sometimes it's a case of hoping players find that form at the right time and play through it and there's a few that appear to be in that situation all at once. 
Rossal
Posts: 1025
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Rossal »

Can't be having Gordon LW. His form there for club and country has been atrocious for well over a year.  
Swiss.
Posts: 2264
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 345 times
Been liked: 467 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Swiss. »

I was happy about all the results last night except maybe a Denmark losing as I have some Danish ancestry, However I did work in Prague for  15 months and lived in Stockholm for 3 years and have family links to Turkey so all good.

Can't stand the Italians. 
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4641
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 285 times
Been liked: 1390 times

Re: Eye ties

Post El Scorchio »

Pickford

toss up between Hall and O'Reilly. I think we are weak here and this position will be our weak link
Stones
Guehi
James

Rice
Bellingham
Anderson if Bellingham is the 10, Palmer if Bellingham is the 8. JB is a cսnt but he's better than Rogers.

Gordon
Kane
Saka (yes, over Bowen reluctantly. Bowen won't go hiding but Saka just has that little bit more pace and fear factor for defenders and with the security of Gordon on the other side it's needed. If Rashford started I'd be very tempted with Bowen on the right.)
happygilmore
Posts: 960
Old WHO Number: 34065
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 76 times

Re: Eye ties

Post happygilmore »

the coming of gary" wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 09:50 Last night was a laugh, but If i'm honest i think all previous winners should be given automatic qualification.

its only eight places out of forty - eight these days. And its better if Brazil Italy, Argentina are all there

Anyone who disagrees can watch Bosnia v Qatar on June 24th !!
.
Expanded WC, you get hammered home and away by Norway, then an easy play off route via Northern Ireland and Bosnia and you fuck it up, you don't deserve to be there.
It's not the fucking Eurovision!
I'll probably only watch the Q/Fs onwards with any serious interest. I'm sure the Yanks will ham it up
onsideman
Posts: 1700
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 425 times
Been liked: 296 times

Re: Eye ties

Post onsideman »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 11:48 My starting XI for the first England game at the WC would be:

Pickford

Livramento
Stones
Maguire
Shaw

Rice
Anderson
Palmer

Bowen
Kane
Gordon

That team would do well.
So, "Come on you whites"?? Interesting
Rossal
Posts: 1025
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Rossal »

                Pickford 

James Konsa Guehi Hall 
  
         Rice   Anderson 

Palmer   Bellingham  Rashford 

               Kane 

that would be my thinking, would require Palmer to pick up some form though for Chelsea.  Maguire may start over Konsa aswell as such a threat at set pieces.   Rodgers, Wharton, O' Reilly could also force themselves into the 11 between now and end of season for me. 

That RW spot is probably the most open, although would be surprising if Saka doesnt start against Croatia. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8771
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 5092 times
Been liked: 2739 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Massive Attack »

I was in two minds about Saka initially going with Bowen but found both in indifferent form this season and Saka does have the experience in Tournaments that made me think I'd start him ahead of him. I'd be fine with Bowen starting though, yet cannot see Tuchel taking him the way he thinks of him as an afterthought.
Council Scum
Posts: 822
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 320 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Council Scum »

Massive Attack" wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 11:54 If all fit my best starting England XI would be..


Pickford

James Stones Guehi Hall

Rice Bellingham 

Saka Palmer Gordon

Kane




 
Wouldn't have Saka anywhere near the team, rest looks ok though. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8771
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 5092 times
Been liked: 2739 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Massive Attack »

If all fit my best starting England XI would be..


Pickford

James Stones Guehi Hall

Rice Bellingham 

Saka Palmer Gordon

Kane



 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1561
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 107 times
Been liked: 367 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Come On You Irons »

My starting XI for the first England game at the WC would be:

Pickford

Livramento
Stones
Maguire
Shaw

Rice
Anderson
Palmer

Bowen
Kane
Gordon

That team would do well.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4641
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 285 times
Been liked: 1390 times

Re: Eye ties

Post El Scorchio »

Yup it's got to be Watkins. Who else is there? DCL for a big physical alternative to throw on if we need a change of plan or a goal? If you give Watkins chances, he will finish them. Rashford will go as he's seen as versatile and can play 2-3 positions. Trouble is he's either a match winner or he's shit. England have too many of those in contention to start games. You can't have 2-3 boom or bust players in the same side at this level because they will let you down in key moments. You need a guaranteed level of performance which the likes of Rashford or Madueke don't give you. If you're playing a Madueke you need a Gordon on the other side rather than a Rashford, IMO.

It's a shame Bellingham is clearly an ego and a cսnt, really. I'd like him nailed on for the 10 or the 8 as he's clearly a better player than the rest of them. It's a shame to see such talent not playing.
User avatar
Tomshardware
Posts: 1404
Old WHO Number: 266280
Has liked: 775 times
Been liked: 350 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Tomshardware »

Gaffer58 wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 11:16 Without Kane up front there’s no purpose, May as well play Wilson then what he’s experimented with, whats Watkins done wrong, at least he’s a decent backup to Kane, who is not going to manage many 90 minutes in the summer heat.
Agreed, Watkins is still a decent alternative and has proven he can score goals at that level.  I'd pick him over Rashford.
Gaffer58
Posts: 327
Old WHO Number: 292526
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Gaffer58 »

Without Kane up front there’s no purpose, May as well play Wilson then what he’s experimented with, whats Watkins done wrong, at least he’s a decent backup to Kane, who is not going to manage many 90 minutes in the summer heat.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 4641
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 285 times
Been liked: 1390 times

Re: Eye ties

Post El Scorchio »

Italy are a total basket case. Complete boom or bust with them. Still a crying shame we lost on pens to them in 2021. That really was a golden chance which we should have taken. Don't think that prick Saka has missed one since has he?

Glad to see our Czech mates qualified for the first time in 20 years
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 8771
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 5092 times
Been liked: 2739 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Massive Attack »

Bosnia are ranked 65th in the World as well which rubs salt into injury. 😬

As for Japan (19th), they're actually a half decent side now these days with some quality that can do damage. Quality goal once Pamler gifted it to them in their half. We had many missing but still no excuse to lose and one to take on the chin. 

 
the coming of gary
Posts: 459
Old WHO Number: 14200
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 134 times

Re: Eye ties

Post the coming of gary »

Last night was a laugh, but If i'm honest i think all previous winners should be given automatic qualification.

its only eight places out of forty - eight these days. And its better if Brazil Italy, Argentina are all there

Anyone who disagrees can watch Bosnia v Qatar on June 24th !!
.
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 2106
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 139 times
Been liked: 291 times

Re: Eye ties

Post BRANDED »

What I thought last night was we learnt how to pass a ball but forgot how to play winning football.
Rossal
Posts: 1025
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 26 times
Been liked: 153 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Rossal »

dealcanvey wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 07:50 Anyone watch England last night?

Tuchel getting on my nerves. Another manager trying to fit square pegs in round holes and re write football. Started 7 midfielders last night and looked disjointed. 

Less confident for this tournament than I was with Southgate.




 
Agree with this.  Most the players that started against Uruguay wouldn't be on the plane for the majority of fans.  Last night Foden gets rewarded with a shit performance to start in the no 9. Rogers on the left was terrible, Palmer terrible. 

Not having Tuchel at all, we were awful last night and I am not convinced the back 4 will keep the likes of Mbappe and Yamal quiet in the latter stages. 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4809
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 232 times
Been liked: 641 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Manuel »

I don't fancy this US world cup much and don't really rate England's chances. We do have some talent in midfield but the defense looks suspect and we're being told again today that we are heavily reliant on Kane up top while conveniently forgetting his mediocre performances in previous tournaments. 

Fancy we might exit in the QF.
Perry Nium
Posts: 61
Location: Melbourne
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Perry Nium »

Remembering how smug they were after they beat England in the euros at Wembley, I very much approve of this.
zico
Posts: 5075
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 693 times
Been liked: 464 times

Re: Eye ties

Post zico »

I usually forget England are on these days but caught it last night and realised how dull they really are and have been for a long time.  Even under Southgate with the element of "success" with semi finals and finals I just found them dull to watch, but it's systematic of football in general with this possession based, side, back, side, back, rinse and repeat style of play.  Wasn't a surprise when they forced it later on they gained plenty of corners.

I just think there are far too many players of average standard getting caps and a manager gives himself a headache trying to work out an 11 from 30 odd players.  Last night was a perfect opportunity to maybe see if Bowen for instance could play as a striker, a back up to Kane, but he went with a bizarre line up up top with no proper forward.  If I am honest I'd hardly seen a lot of these players, who was the left back who just watched for the goal?  

Like Italy I don't think the European big sides are as good as they were.  Do the German's, Italians, French, Dutch all have better players than they did in say 1990?  Maybe the Spanish are better than they were back then but on the whole I don't think the players are as good.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 6516
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 599 times
Been liked: 1127 times

Re: Eye ties

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 08:00
goose wrote: 31 Mar 2026, 22:46
XKhammer wrote: 31 Mar 2026, 22:45
Away???
And you can get WiFi in prison?
I know you’re poor son, but some people do go on holiday from time to time.
Stop crying goosestep what with Italy and Russia not being there you still have Iran to cheer on
Or maybe you could go and watch some opera and sing Figaro Figaro Figaro rather than World Cup watching Eyeties scoring Zero Zero Zero 
This is going to be a long summer for you ha ha ha 
Even longer for you, hiking in Ireland and sleeping in a tent.
Hilarious that you think opera is an insult. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2754
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 452 times

Re: Eye ties

Post Mad Ferret »

dealcanvey wrote: 01 Apr 2026, 07:50 Anyone watch England last night?

Tuchel getting on my nerves. Another manager trying to fit square pegs in round holes and re write football. Started 7 midfielders last night and looked disjointed. 

Less confident for this tournament than I was with Southgate.
 
Was awful but you can read much into friendlies. 

Don’t really fancy us at all at the WC, but we got to the final of the Euros with a sub standard manager and an underperforming team, so anything is possible.
Post Reply