Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Crapaqueta

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1155
Been liked: 273 times

Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6649
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3827 times
Been liked: 2008 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:29
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:22
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 

No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension. 
But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them? 
Because I seriously question his state of mind for obvious reasons. I'm actually genuinely concerned for the bloke as he's clearly struggled and the last match he played he proved he couldn't keep it together when we can ill afford for it to happen. We lose that game scoring nothing he doesn't play the next difficult game away and we score and draw without him. I genuinely think both he and us would benefit if he was available on the bench. It would also send the right message to others that you have to earn your place back especially after how he badly reacted. It feels a bit soon to chuck him straight back in to the fold but hopefully it works out and we can beat Brighton. He's going to be back under intense pressure, let's hope he manages to cope alright.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:22
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 

No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension. 
But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them? 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6649
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3827 times
Been liked: 2008 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 

No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:32

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:46
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
 
 
I didn't say he was our best player this year, I said he contributes more than most but they don't get the stick he does. He gets the blame for everything but is one of our best performers and why he's straight back in the team... But what I do find bollocks is those claiming we're better without him and even bigger bollocks those saying he isn't a team player when he doesn't stop grafting. 
Gaffer58
Posts: 289
Old WHO Number: 292526
Been liked: 43 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gaffer58 »

Probably if we didn’t spend most of every game with less possession then our opponents and not defending on our 18 yard line then he would have a lot better stats.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6649
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3827 times
Been liked: 2008 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:32
Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 17:52
 
 

He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball 




 

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Last edited by Massive Attack on 05 Dec 2025, 19:11, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1047
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 362 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:32
Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 17:52
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:58
The post said we absolutely missed him and gave clear evidence of not only that game but also his previous 58 games in a row where he doesn't contribute to a single assist, yet he is supposed to be our main creative attacking midfielder. And the fact we instantly got a very positive result and performance without him.
 
 

He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball 


 

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Keep dreaming" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 17:50
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:42
Keep dreaming" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:40 We missed a Winger and a Striker long before Paqueta.
I don't want him back in the team at all.
He is far to nonchalant.
Good riddance!
He's starting Sunday 
The incompetence in and around the club is endless
 
 
Hà ha it is, but I would pick him every time. 

It's all very well saying we played better without him (we didn't) we've won 2 lost 1 and drawn 2 of our last 5, he played in both the wins...didn't win either game he didn't play in.. Was motm against Newcastle, he has won the ball back and more duals than anyone in our team which makes him our best defensive player and he's our joint top goal scorer, but yeah he brings nothing to the table. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6649
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3827 times
Been liked: 2008 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 17:52
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:58
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:56
By that metric we wouldn't have missed any of them that played against Liverpool because we were shit and lost 2-0 
The post said we absolutely missed him and gave clear evidence of not only that game but also his previous 58 games in a row where he doesn't contribute to a single assist, yet he is supposed to be our main creative attacking midfielder. And the fact we instantly got a very positive result and performance without him.
 
 

He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball 

 

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
Gank
Posts: 1084
Has liked: 798 times
Been liked: 618 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:58
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:56
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:53
And yet having started him against a seriously out of form Liverpool side at Home having just returned from suspension already in the very same match, he got himself moronically sent off and we then went on to concede another without contributing anything losing 0-2. Then in his absence the Team with rock bottom confidence immediately managed to earn a well earned 1-1 draw at Old Trafford of all places. We didn't miss him at all, a player who couldn't assist a suicidal Ian Watkins from dying. 58 consecutive matches now. 
By that metric we wouldn't have missed any of them that played against Liverpool because we were shit and lost 2-0 
The post said we absolutely missed him and gave clear evidence of not only that game but also his previous 58 games in a row where he doesn't contribute to a single assist, yet he is supposed to be our main creative attacking midfielder. And the fact we instantly got a very positive result and performance without him.
 
 
 

That's nonsense from computer game football. He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball then almost all of our players are shit and would also explain your love for Soucek who does next to nothing compared to Paqueta but does get occasional all important touches.

I was there on Sunday and loved watching him, he put a lot of work in and although he tries a lot of killer balls far too advanced for his mediocre team mates and loses the ball, he puts the graft into trying to get it back. Also love his back heeled no look passes and flicking it over a defender onto his own head to volley a near miss. With Kudus gone, he's the only player we have left who can get us excited. 

Was he an idiot for getting sent off? Yes. Would a proper captain have prevented it? Probably. Is he our best player? By a mile. (Although Fernandes was on that day)
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1636
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 572 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Keep dreaming »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:42
Keep dreaming" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:40 We missed a Winger and a Striker long before Paqueta.
I don't want him back in the team at all.
He is far to nonchalant.
Good riddance!
He's starting Sunday 
The incompetence in and around the club is endless
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1047
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 362 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 14:21
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Absolutely yes. They were there for the taking. We did really well with the fortitude and grit but lacked the flair.
We don't only miss the good bits when he's not playing for us. We also miss the bad things too. I would say his presence undermines the fortitude and grit of the team and it's that which got us a draw. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6649
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3827 times
Been liked: 2008 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:56
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:53
Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 14:21
Absolutely yes. They were there for the taking. We did really well with the fortitude and grit but lacked the flair.
And yet having started him against a seriously out of form Liverpool side at Home having just returned from suspension already in the very same match, he got himself moronically sent off and we then went on to concede another without contributing anything losing 0-2. Then in his absence the Team with rock bottom confidence immediately managed to earn a well earned 1-1 draw at Old Trafford of all places. We didn't miss him at all, a player who couldn't assist a suicidal Ian Watkins from dying. 58 consecutive matches now. 
By that metric we wouldn't have missed any of them that played against Liverpool because we were shit and lost 2-0 
The post said we absolutely missed him and gave clear evidence of not only that game but also his previous 58 games in a row where he doesn't contribute to a single assist, yet he is supposed to be our main creative attacking midfielder. And the fact we instantly got a very positive result and performance without him.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:53
Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 14:21
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Absolutely yes. They were there for the taking. We did really well with the fortitude and grit but lacked the flair.
And yet having started him against a seriously out of form Liverpool side at Home having just returned from suspension already in the very same match, he got himself moronically sent off and we then went on to concede another without contributing anything losing 0-2. Then in his absence the Team with rock bottom confidence immediately managed to earn a well earned 1-1 draw at Old Trafford of all places. We didn't miss him at all, a player who couldn't assist a suicidal Ian Watkins from dying. 58 consecutive matches now. 
By that metric we wouldn't have missed any of them that played against Liverpool because we were shit and lost 2-0 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6649
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3827 times
Been liked: 2008 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 14:21
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Absolutely yes. They were there for the taking. We did really well with the fortitude and grit but lacked the flair.
And yet having started him against a seriously out of form Liverpool side at Home having just returned from suspension already in the very same match, he got himself moronically sent off and we then went on to concede another without contributing anything losing 0-2. Then in his absence the Team with rock bottom confidence immediately managed to earn a well earned 1-1 draw at Old Trafford of all places. We didn't miss him at all, a player who couldn't assist a suicidal Ian Watkins from dying. 58 consecutive matches now. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Keep dreaming" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:40 We missed a Winger and a Striker long before Paqueta.
I don't want him back in the team at all.
He is far to nonchalant.
Good riddance!
He's starting Sunday 
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1636
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 572 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Keep dreaming »

We missed a Winger and a Striker long before Paqueta.
I don't want him back in the team at all.
He is far to nonchalant.
Good riddance!
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2671
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 162 times
Been liked: 426 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:22
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Not at all. In fact I'd say the players looked happier for him not being there.

Nonuts bottled a great opportunity to give Marshall a start at LWF with a central midfield 3 of Potts, Maggie and Fernandes, of course the gutless coward shat it.
I can't believe he didn't pick Josh Brownhill 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1155
Been liked: 273 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Not at all. In fact I'd say the players looked happier for him not being there.

Nonuts bottled a great opportunity to give Marshall a start at LWF with a central midfield 3 of Potts, Maggie and Fernandes, of course the gutless coward shat it.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3766
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 185 times
Been liked: 1046 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post El Scorchio »

Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 14:21
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Absolutely yes. They were there for the taking. We did really well with the fortitude and grit but lacked the flair.
Completely agree. I'd prefer Soucek as an impact sub rather than a starter as well. 
Gank
Posts: 1084
Has liked: 798 times
Been liked: 618 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gank »

wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 13:58 So did we miss him last night?
Absolutely yes. They were there for the taking. We did really well with the fortitude and grit but lacked the flair.
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1047
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 362 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

So did we miss him last night?
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5035
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 46 times
Been liked: 652 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Mike Oxsaw »

XKhammer wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 15:13
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 15:08
XKhammer wrote: 02 Dec 2025, 14:57
A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT 
 
Has he taken your own appointment with a counsellor then? Jumped the queue, like?

Maybe he's got a couple of tranny mates, too, living Upminster/Cranham. No wonder you're so vexed here.
Recommend one for him do you?
I've never needed counselling or trannies unlike you
The fact that you so quickly trigger yourself. pickled-style, on the very sight of an anonymous user name suggests that counselling is exactly what you do need. Probably along with a soapy massage from a tranny on the side, too.
Post Reply