Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Smoking to be banned.

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
only1billybonds
Posts: 1891
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Smoking to be banned.

Post only1billybonds »

"Hot on the heels of the online safety bill, Sunak is considering bringing in a law that will make it illegal for anyone born after 2009 to buy tobaco products. This is nanny state on steroids, and must be opposed if and when a bill gets read. When i heard a couple of years ago that New Zealand were making this a law i really thought it couldnt happen here. Besides, all it will do is create a massive black market and amber leaf will become the new weed. I have'nt smoked for 6 years now but thats beside the point, and what will be next? Alcohol to be outlawed or at least limits put on how much you can buy. This is where we're heading, once we go cashless, the decision in what and how much you buy will no longer be yours to make. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/22/rishi-sunak-considers-banning-cigarettes-for-next-generation"
J.Riddle
Posts: 273
Old WHO Number: 237845

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post J.Riddle »

"I've seen ex smokers relatives who gave up too late slowly suffocating to death from Emphysema gasping for breathe with oxygen tank keeping them alive, others got lung cancer and succumbed. So I wouldn't be against it. Then again I wouldn't be against a ban on alcohol in the longer term having seen other relatives die of ascites due to cirrhosis of the liver. Ted Fenton ex WHO poster RIP was a good man who succumbed. I realise there would be objections to doing that, but alcohol is a toxic corrosive poison. I speak as a moderate ex smoker and ex drinker who has been diagnosed with copd and has a disfunctional liver. You are poisoning yourself taking both the above, either or both will kill you, just a matter of time depending to quantity taken and the cost to NHS is massive."
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 966
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Iron Duke »

"Apart from the obvious issues of freedom of choice and age discrimination, this makes little sense. It has become so expensive to smoke nowadays that most people have turned to vaping. In fact, the tobacco industry was dying on its arse and vaping and e-cigarettes have stepped into the void."
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1697
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Sydney_Iron »

"Fuck sake, im an ex-smoker and quit years ago now, it's been banned just about everywhere anyway, but let people at least make a personal choice if they smoke or not, fuck off with your ban. But what's next, once they have smoking banned, then alcohol, fatty foods or sports that are deemed ""dangerous"" like Boxing? We already have some elites calling for bans to Boxing, higher taxation of fast food and booze etc. UK, dogs etc"
Jim C
Posts: 10

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Jim C »

"As RB pointed out, the money made on tax alone will likely prevent this actually happening. IF they do ban it, all that will happen is it will be brought and sold elsewhere. People will still smoke and the already limited police numbers and funds will be wasted on chasing illegal tobacco sales."
RM10
Posts: 565
Old WHO Number: 15416
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post RM10 »

"Vaping chemicals will be the next cancer, when will they learn. Inhaling any smoke related product into your throat and lungs isn’t good."
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Pentonville »

"I smoked for 33 years. When I see it now, i just can't believe the pull it had on me. The very thought of puffing that smoke into my lungs etc and the cough and weezing stuns me..I just can't beleive I did it or enjoyed it but at the time I couldn't live without one..its mad."
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Side of Ham »

Anyone born after 2009 is looking to vape rather than smoke tobacco?
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post Vexed »

"This could work, ban for non smokers now but the established smokers have to 3x their smoking intake to plug the tax hole. They'll die more quickly that way relieving the NHS burden which will eventually make up for the potential tax deficit of all those dead smokers no longer able to buy fags. Solved."
RBshorty
Posts: 832
Old WHO Number: 211268
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 79 times

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post RBshorty »

Never happen. Too much money is made from the Tax alone. Try plugging that hole.! Really worked well for the Yanks when they tried and ban the booze. It is PR stunt at best. Trying to sucker in a few voter’s.
dax47988
Posts: 13
Old WHO Number: 212409

Re: Smoking to be banned.

Post dax47988 »

"smoking is pretty disgusting and smokers generally have no idea how much they stink there is no question that this filthy habit should be removed from society, tho a whacking great sledgehammer is probably not the best way"
Post Reply