AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Peter Banks
-
maverick180
- Posts: 177
- Old WHO Number: 21515
- Been liked: 1 time
Peter Banks
It’s not possible this bloke is consistently this bad He 100% takes money to fix matches We as a club should call him out on it after this match
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Peter Banks
"Just got back from the game, so haven't seen any TV replays but from my vantage point the free kick for their equaliser looked extremely soft and the referee seemed far more lenient to them for their fouls than to us. Seemed to me to be a clear case of ""rich club bias""."
-
El Scorchio
- Posts: 2306
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 58 times
- Been liked: 408 times
Re: Peter Banks
"Fifth- when trippier strikes the ball their guy nearest the camera is offside, I’m certain. It may actually be Isak, I can’t remember. I don’t know how the player couldn’t be not interfering with play."
-
Helmut Shown
- Posts: 1292
- Old WHO Number: 213307
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 63 times
Re: Peter Banks
"Its the same every time one of these north west.mafia take control of matches. I thought there would be an improvement when Mike Dean retired but they got him a job fucking up VAR. He was shit at that so he's now on Sky spouting bilious claptrap. Its not as if its an incompetent making mistakes, as you'd expect it to even out throughout the game. I suspect they are briefed to favour the rich clubs or they are under the control of betting syndicates. I give examples of Balbuena, Feghouli, Souchek being sent off by these twats and that decision given by that other northern twat Bobby Madley to allow an offside and handball by Wilson for Bournemouth that he single-handedly overturned. He was sacked after that for taking the piss out of a disabled bloke although I suspect it was for this blatant wrong decision."
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 2682
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 268 times
Re: Peter Banks
"The referee was just laughable Presume he was one of the ones that did a midweek trip to Saudi on the promise of a bunk up with a CAMEL First half I thought we started slowly for the first 8 mins and then scored and played as well as we have this season. Came out in a coma for the second half ... of course they scored from that ludicrous free kick ... and let the game drift. Only picked up when the dismal Antonio was replaced by the dynamic KUDUS & think the point was deserved. Could have won it at the end too. I'd play Kudus in a free role across the front. He wins the ball, beats people and runs with it. Can create chances for himself and win free kicks close to goal for JWP."
-
Fifth Column
- Posts: 241
- Old WHO Number: 17231
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 23 times
Re: Peter Banks
"Scorchio I don't understand what you meant re offside. You mean for their first goal? When the initial cross comes in from the free kick, the person jumping with Alvarez (who's the only one interfering) was onside. Alvarez then heads it to Isak. Definitely not offside. But for the second, Isak pushes Aguerd in the back with two hands before scoring and looks around to check if it's been disallowed before celebrating. Unless there is another angle I haven't seen which shows something different for that one then I cannot understand for the life of me how VAR haven't called it as a clear and obvious error. Failure to make yellow card decisions also unacceptable (though nothing to do with VAR). I haven't seen the Paqueta foul again for the free kick leading to the first goal."
Re: Peter Banks
Isak also offside from free kick for first goal but am not sure if he is okay because it hit our defender before he scored?
Re: Peter Banks
"Close to the end of the game a Newcastle player did a two handed push to Paq's back, making him fall oer. Banks was looking right at them but nothing given. It was a truly disgraceful performance and he should be stood down."
-
maverick180
- Posts: 177
- Old WHO Number: 21515
- Been liked: 1 time
-
El Scorchio
- Posts: 2306
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 58 times
- Been liked: 408 times
Re: Peter Banks
"Well, anything noteworthy in our match has just been overshadowed by Kovacic not getting sent off in the other game. That’s all anyone will be talking about now unfortunately. We may get a small mention at the bottom of a paragraph."
Re: Peter Banks
"If we were Liverpool, this bloke would be banned from reffing us again this season. The non sending off is an absolute joke. They were identical cynical fouls a couple of minutes apart. The Almiron no yellow card. The foul given against Paqueta which isn’t a foul at any level. I’ll be disappointed if Moyes doesn’t take the fine to highlight. Every commentator and pundit has called it a disgrace."
-
El Scorchio
- Posts: 2306
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 58 times
- Been liked: 408 times
Re: Peter Banks
"We should. He was fucking dreadful and did not apply the rules consistently to both sides. Never mind not dishing out cards for their players which would have resulted in two sendings off, not booking one of theirs for literally the same thing Emerson was booked for. The free kick for their goal wasn’t a foul and the VAR needs looking at. They didn’t even draw a line for an initial offside from their free kick before the second ball which looked 50/50 at best and I am positive their player’s shoulder was in advance of our last defender. I really really want to see that again because if so that’s a repeat of the Liverpool thing but in favour of the attacker instead."