Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

County Cricket 2024

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2676
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

County Cricket 2024

Post Fauxstralian »

"Opening day of the county season .... No play at : Durham, Kent, Lancashire , Derby, Sussex & Yorkshire No play in a Test match for Jofra Archer until 2025"
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2676
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Fauxstralian »

Great recovery by Warwickshire at Chelmsford From 64/5 & 104/6 to 308/6 at stumps
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2676
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Fauxstralian »

Noone got to 50 or any innings to 200 at Somerset but was pace & seam rather than a turner Usually can blame that on weather in the preparation so dont imagine there will be any comeback Was reading that counties are struggling to find eligible overseas players due to all the t20 leagues around Used to be eligibility for visas was based on international caps but was changed to allow players to play if they had 20 t20 games in a full member country in the last 3 years Understand clubs have to the end of May to lobby the Home Office to change it Bit odd that red ball players arent eligible to play County Championship without a t20 record
violator
Posts: 569
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post violator »

Up the cidermen
Far Cough
Posts: 2593
Old WHO Number: 34087
Been liked: 1 time

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Far Cough »

"Fuck off you prick, if you don't like cricket,so why click on a cricket post?"
Nutsin
Posts: 2239
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Nutsin »

Cricket is shit. Baseball is much better!
RM10
Posts: 565
Old WHO Number: 15416
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post RM10 »

Somerset pitch again?
Far Cough
Posts: 2593
Old WHO Number: 34087
Been liked: 1 time

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Far Cough »

Stinks of cooked pitches this one?
martinbritt_63
Posts: 56
Old WHO Number: 300869
Been liked: 2 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post martinbritt_63 »

"Wurzels turned over for 128. Advantage the Seaxes albeit only by 28 runs. Congrats to Cook & Porter who shared the spoils, each with fivefors - appears that Kookaburra or Duke, they all come the same to these guys. Now let's see how 2nd innings goes and hope that weather doesn't impact the final outcome."
violator
Posts: 569
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post violator »

"Wurzels are STEAMING through the Essex top order, sounds like a bowlers paradise out there"
User avatar
easthammer
Posts: 2480
Old WHO Number: 15731
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 92 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post easthammer »

"Thank you LT I tried to look on-line but could only find that if level on points it went to games won and then to relative performance between the sides concerned, As Surrey and Essex hadn't yet played each other couldn't work out why. Have to say my searches led me to conclude that the MCC and some Counties need to do some work on their websites."
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2676
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Fauxstralian »

"Why were Surrey put in first place? To save the bother of having to change the table before the season ends Lots of rain, lots of draws May tomorrow so hopefully will see more completed games"
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3087
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 440 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Lee Trundle »

"SURREY > essex That's why. If the teams are level on points, and haven't played, then it goes down to most wickets taken and then most runs scored."
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post onsideman »

"Good question. I'd say most likely reason is that Surrey won their game early on day 4 so reached 71 points before the points were awarded for the draw in the Durham-Essex game, and Essex didn't overhaul them, just matched them. Could be way off though"
User avatar
easthammer
Posts: 2480
Old WHO Number: 15731
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 92 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post easthammer »

Question for you Cricket Experts Why are Essex currently shown below Surrey in the County Championship table despite both teams having won 2 and drawn 2 with the same points 71?
martinbritt_63
Posts: 56
Old WHO Number: 300869
Been liked: 2 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post martinbritt_63 »

"I believe you'll find that Duke balls are in use for this round of matches - the Kookaburra was only for the first two rounds. They may be utilised for another couple of rounds later in the season, Incidentally - Essex have just crushed Lancs by an innings by lunch on day 3."
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2676
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Fauxstralian »

Kookaburra balls weeding out some of the pie throwers stealing a living Essex storming towards victory v Lancs .... need 4 more wickets with a lead of 180. Dont think any other Div1 team has won a game yet though Surrey in a good position against Kent with almost 2 full days left. Ahead with 9 wickets in hand ... Sibley n.o century & D Lawrence 72no
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1519
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 92 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post zebthecat »

That's Kookaburra balls you.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1519
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 92 times
Been liked: 115 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post zebthecat »

That's Kookaburra balls you.
RM10
Posts: 565
Old WHO Number: 15416
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post RM10 »

"Typical April, every match a draw."
Far Cough
Posts: 2593
Old WHO Number: 34087
Been liked: 1 time

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Far Cough »

"Essex and Kent drew Gave it a go, just run out of time."
martinbritt_63
Posts: 56
Old WHO Number: 300869
Been liked: 2 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post martinbritt_63 »

"Watched the whole day - most enjoyable - nervous @ 10/2 but they accomplished what they were unable to do last season. Contributions throughout the order - Elgar, Cox. Walter (crocked as he was) Critchley & Pepper. The absence of Sam Cook is a concern but it's certainly an encouraging start."
Far Cough
Posts: 2593
Old WHO Number: 34087
Been liked: 1 time

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Far Cough »

Essex are a decent 421/6 at close on day one against Kent Elgar with 120 and Critchley not out on 103
violator
Posts: 569
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post violator »

"Get the feeling the BBC are rooting for Surrey this season -------------------------------------------------------------------- What a catch! Jordan Clark induces the edge off Sean Dickson's bat and the ball flies towards Jamie Overton's bucket hands at second slip. But it bounces out of those and drops towards the floor at first, where Dom Sibley gets down low to grab it. Brilliant work from the slipper. Shades of Chris Tavare and Geoff Miller at the MCG in the Boxing Day Test of 1982. Batting - tick! Bowling - tick! Fielding - tick! Surrey tick all the boxes"
RM10
Posts: 565
Old WHO Number: 15416
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post RM10 »

Two new boys saving Essex from poor start.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2676
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 263 times

Re: County Cricket 2024

Post Fauxstralian »

Seems very early to be playing cricket but guess the t20 World Cup is in June pushing the Tests back to a mid July start. And of course the Hundred takes the peak county period. Has ANY other country expressed the slightest interest in taking up the Hundred?
Post Reply