AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Harvey Weinstein.
-
- Posts: 1849
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 330 times
Harvey Weinstein.
Clearly the guy is a sexual predator but my question is why are all of these women only coming out now? If Jolie and Paltrow had reported him 25 years ago then surely this would have stopped him? Surely by saying nothing they are assisting an offender?
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
>>> But where are all these outraged Lefties now that one of their own has been outed as a rapist and serial molester? They're all over the media right now. Are you blind?
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
"Yes, of course Obama knew. It's inconceivable that he didn't. But the elite always behave this way - they and their friends can do no wrong. The outrage over Trump's comments about grabbing women by their p****ies was fully justified - that isn't acceptable language even amongst men in the pub. But where are all these outraged Lefties now that one of their own has been outed as a rapist and serial molester? Matt Damon for one, has been wailing about Trump's sexism and disrespect for women incessantly for over a year. Now The New York Times has revealed that Damon was recruited by Weinstein to help bully the NYT into not publishing an earlier story about Weinstein molesting young actresses."
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
">>> I wonder if they would be so complainy now, long after the events, had they gone on to be as successful as Angelina and Charlize. Possibly not. And it's possible there are more successful actresses who haven't revealed their stories yet. But what relevance does that have to anything? What possible positive comes out of you snarking at the victims of abuse?"
-
- Posts: 86
- Old WHO Number: 11861
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
So you are saying Obama and his wife KNEW Weinstein was a suspected rapist so they decided to let their daughter work in the same organisation? Why would they do that if they thought she was at risk? Is it because they are evil LEFTY types ???
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 998
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 398 times
- Been liked: 397 times
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
"The small handful of actresses who went public with their accusations and kicked off this whole scandal: never heard of 'em. I wonder if they would be so complainy now, long after the events, had they gone on to be as successful as Angelina and Charlize. Funny to see the usual suspects scrambling to express their outrage and condemn their erstwhile great friend who was giving them all the starring roles. Of course...they never knew for sure...only heard vague rumours..."
-
- Posts: 14
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
Boycott pedowood! It's the only way to teach these white Protestant paedo monsters who run Hollywood
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3085
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
Obama has done what any LIBTARD would do in this situation and used it to issue a thinly veiled attack on Trump.
-
- Posts: 1481
- Old WHO Number: 215633
-
- Posts: 336
- Old WHO Number: 14384
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
This is why it's so ridiculous when luvvies in the BBC and Hollywood always try and lecture the plebs about morals and ethics. The entire arts/entertainment industry is full of degenerates and nonces. See the stars' support of Roman Polanski for another example.
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
"Wonder how Obama is feeling ? Weinstein is a personal friend of the Obamas and contributed large sums to the Obama election campaign. In return little Malia Obama got a prestigious internship at Uncle Harvey's company over the Summer. Now it turns out that not only is Weinstein a serial rapist but he hardly even kept it a secret. The Obamas must have known, what with the Secret Service carefully vetting every friendship of theirs and all. So St Barack of Obama and his odious wife aren't so saintly after all."
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3085
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 439 times
-
- Posts: 113
- Old WHO Number: 15562
-
- Posts: 1481
- Old WHO Number: 215633
-
- Posts: 113
- Old WHO Number: 15562
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
"Knew nothing about this bloke until now. After a bit of reading, I see he's behind some of the better films of the last 30 years. Very much helped Tarantino when he was at his early best. It's not good what he's been doing, of that I'm certain, but will it be OK to like the films he's produced from now on?"
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
"Actress: I want to be in your film. What's it called? HW: You have to give me a blowjob first *Actress gets busy Actress: So am i in?! HW: You are indeed. Oh by the way, we've changed the film name from ""you have to give me a blowjob first"" to Pulp Fiction. Hope you don't mind? Cheers for the blowy btw! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- and that, your honour, is the case for the defence...."
-
- Posts: 1481
- Old WHO Number: 215633
-
- Posts: 526
- Old WHO Number: 18101
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 68 times
-
- Posts: 674
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 56 times
- Been liked: 135 times
Re: Harvey Weinstein.
"Laughable to see that rag The Guardian publishing an article yesterday about how they had contacted 20 men, major players in the film industry, for their views on this and none had replied. So now, apparently, this is all the fault of men who were and are protecting this pervert and his like through their silence. Nothing to do with all those women, many with personal experience, who also said nothing for years and allowed others to suffer similar experiences. Given the number of people coming forward, this must have been common knowledge for years."
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3085
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 439 times