AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
VAR - What is it good for?
-
- Posts: 539
- Old WHO Number: 10365
- Has liked: 190 times
- Been liked: 79 times
Re: VAR - What is it good for?
What is it good for? Keeping the current top teams the top teams forever.
Re: VAR - What is it good for?
"It shouldn't be used to make subjective decisions, purely those based on facts. If that prat today in Stockley Park sent the Referee to the monitor then that official isn't 100% sure it is a foul. If he isn't 100% sure how can you give it? In the ""good"" old days whilst bloody annoying and a good subject in a pub you could accept bad decisions to an extent as human error. Now they are making decisions that arouse suspicion."
Re: VAR - What is it good for?
It didn't even work well on Wednesday. Made the right decision but it took over 3 minutes to make. The commentators saw 2 replays within about 30 seconds and made the right call. Why can't a var ref (should be more than 1 in reality) do the same and play continues without the stupid delay?
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 2303
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 58 times
- Been liked: 404 times
Re: VAR - What is it good for?
It’s just so frustrating when you see it used perfectly on Wednesday night with the Cresswell incident and with Everton’s goal earlier to then have it inexplicably against the video evidence gift Chelsea two points and deny us one.