Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Manchester Airport incident

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Leonard Hatred
Posts: 2605
Old WHO Number: 209880
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 158 times

Manchester Airport incident

Post Leonard Hatred »

"We're gonna have a British George Floyd now innit. The BLM mob are gonna be all over this. Expect a load of shoe shops to be looted as a ""protest"". This country's gone to the fucking dogs."
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Hammer and Pickle »

"Yes he thinks the police, who feared a racist backlash if they acted, are to blame for the grooming gangs because these existed before the Tory cuts. Meanwhile you seem to have talked yourself into believing I love paedos and rapists. You're both mentally impaired social cases, Pointy."
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 179 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

Fifth loves Muzzies and terrorists in the same way Pickled loves paedos and rapists.
Fifth Column
Posts: 242
Old WHO Number: 17231
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Fifth Column »

"ATBOG: ""In reality he lost his temper and kicked the bloke in the head when he didn't need to and it was entirely against training and protocol."" s that a fact? Yes it is a fact. There is no protocol in use of force training with the Police to kick people in the head when prone on the floor. The geezer had just been tasered. The guy on the floor MORALLY deserved the kicking. But it's contrary to Police training in this context and thus LEGALLY difficult to defend. The idea that what he did is ""protocol"" as you put it is nonsense. Like I said, I think he'll end up being kicked out of the Force for gross misconduct even if he avoids being found guilty in court of assault or ABH. We shall see. I hope all the coppers are OK and the violent men are all sent down."
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Side of Ham »

"I don't think that copper after getting smacked about even knew he (the cսnt on the floor) was incapacitated until he stamped on his head such was his defence mechanism after being smacked up. It's simple for me whatever party threw the first blow gets done big time. If it's on police officers then double that punishment as anything afterwards goes beyond being professional, your human instincts on being attacked kick in no matter how much you have been trained. No one can predict fully their reaction after being struck to the face on multiple occasions."
nychammer
Posts: 1567
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 189 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post nychammer »

"these punks should be punished for assaulting a police officer, instead they'll be given the freedom of Rochdale, be exonerated and compensated and lauded as victims of police brutality. There is something seriously wrong if that ever comes to pass. Not going to say the Police Officer handled it as well as he could, clearly acted through a red mist when he saw his woman colleague take a beating."
Ron Eff
Posts: 614
Old WHO Number: 229621
Has liked: 19 times
Been liked: 154 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Ron Eff »

"The fella, who was hardly seriously injured by the kick, ought to be thankful he misbehaved in this country. In the States, he'd have a bullet between his eyes. Probably France and some other European countries, too. Our Police have nowhere near enough freedom on how to act in these scenarios. They were beating up women colleagues, punching a male copper from behind while those women were on the floor. They could feasibly have got hold of their guns. In an airport. Very least he deserved was a little kick in the head, not to be treated as a victim and given tv time to act as such."
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 888
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 149 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post RootsRadical »

"Full force of the law needs to applied to these entitled cunts as it would be for anyone else! Assault of a police officer with actual bodily harm is 5 years, 7 years if religiously or racially motivated which can be argued."
ATBOG
Posts: 33
Old WHO Number: 213951

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post ATBOG »

"""In reality he lost his temper and kicked the bloke in the head when he didn't need to and it was entirely against training and protocol."" is that a fact? Did it kick off again in Regdale last night?"
Fifth Column
Posts: 242
Old WHO Number: 17231
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 24 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Fifth Column »

"goose No, it absolutely was not ""following protocol"". That's absolute nonsense from ATBOG. Kicking someone lying prone on the floor, in the head, it not protocol. I think the defence to the criminal charge that the copper will face will be, ""I tasered him, I know that sometimes people recover v quickly from being tasered. I would have cuffed him but his mother was blocking me (if you look at multiple videos, the mum is an absolute idiot), I couldn't taser him again as the mum was in the way. We were outnumbered and they had shown significant violence. My options were allowing him to get up and potentially attack me and take my gun [he had gun as well as Taser] or to kick him in the head to reduce the immediate threat. In reality he lost his temper and kicked the bloke in the head when he didn't need to and it was entirely against training and protocol. He might actually get found not guilty by a jury because you need to prove offence beyond reasonable doubt but even if he does get off in court, he'll then get sacked for gross misconduct because on balance of probabilities he just lost his temper and kicked the bloke in the head as a result of the bloke just attacking him and his colleagues. I really hope the attackers don't get let off entirely but I still think that's odds on with some sort of hush hush deal agreed between them and Police to shut this all down."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post goose »

ATBOG 2:42 Sun Jul 28 Re: Manchester Airport incident Is that so? That would shut a few ppl up. Hopefully HMRC and other government entities are having a close look at the lawyer.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Mike Oxsaw »

"...""policeman gets beaten for trying to apprehend someone"".... What is the going rate for such an action in the 21st century? This could end up as ""Arrogant entitled immigrant ancertored thug gets his just deserts in his chosen home country"" with not even the slightest hint of political spin."
ATBOG
Posts: 33
Old WHO Number: 213951

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post ATBOG »

"""policeman gets beaten for trying to apprehend someone does not equal stamp on prone mans head"" copper was holding a firearm and under no circumstances was going to release it. Feet were the only option. Protocol followed and nothing to see here."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post goose »

Soldo you should write a book son.
Northern Sold
Posts: 1110
Old WHO Number: 21756

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Northern Sold »

We had a few run ins with the SPG in the 80's and 90's... as many others would testify... I bet those retired cunts are breathing a huge sigh of relief there was no CTV and video phones around then... fucking animals
Claret Badger
Posts: 64
Old WHO Number: 15597

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Claret Badger »

policeman gets beaten for trying to apprehend someone does not equal stamp on prone mans head we still need bodycam footage and the audio and the transcript of what happened on the plane before the vending machine meeting but policeman let the blood run to his head and forget his office police still in wrong sorry gammons
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1854
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 160 times
Been liked: 329 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Sydney_Iron »

"Interesting to see what happens now this new video has been released? Expect the ""victims"" and their scumbag Lawyer and BLM activists to come up with some nonsense to turn this all around and still blame the Police and DEMAND compensation and people lose their jobs/get jailed. I see some of the Police have already been stood down pending investigation and possible disciplinary charges."
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Nutsin »

"It would appear that rioting gets your kids back and fighting back gets you the chance to sue the cops, so why do the British protestors insist on peaceful demonstrations ffs. Isn't it about time people started getting the attention of gov't the same way the immigrants do?"
aldgate
Posts: 137
Old WHO Number: 218646
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 34 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post aldgate »

"BBC headline is ""Video appears to show lead-up to incident"" - you can almost hear their reluctance to post that story up....."
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 888
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 149 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post RootsRadical »

"This is how propaganda works, same with Pallywood. Edited video/ story goes viral without the context. Media go overboard and don't consider the context, cue outrage and protests. When the story has reached saturation point and the public's attention has wained the truth comes out which time most won't see it or don't care."
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 793
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 439 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

"Now the footage appears to be in the public domain, I'm really looking forward to the BBC Verify analyses."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post goose »

If that wanker doesn't serve time there should be outrage. The kicking he got after was well deserved but shouldn't have any impact on his previous wrong doings. All those smelly cunts protesting outside police stations need to have a long look at themselves.
User avatar
ray winstone
Posts: 481
Location: Utopia
Old WHO Number: 33640
Has liked: 43 times
Been liked: 43 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post ray winstone »

The prequel is pretty damning.
Come On You Irons
Posts: 716
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Come On You Irons »

Just seen the video of the lead up to the officer kicking and stamping on the perpetrator. He deserved all he got after literally punching two female officers and breaking one of their noses. What a cսnt.
NewtonsPartyBag
Posts: 3

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post NewtonsPartyBag »

What a fucking shithole the UK is
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Mike Oxsaw »

"Whatever it is, the official rebranding has begun with a stealthy start: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/26/judges-guidance-terms-asylum-seekers-immigrants-gays/ ""Judges in England and Wales have been advised to avoid terms such as ""asylum seekers""ù, ""immigrant""ù, ""gays""ù and ""lame""ù in new guidance on ""politically incorrect""ù language. A new edition of the Equal Treatment Bench Book sets out in 350 pages how judges should communicate with witnesses, defendants and lawyers in courts and tribunals in England and Wales. It advises that ""person seeking asylum""ù is now preferred to ""asylum seekers""ù as it is more humanising and warns that terms such as ""immigrant""ù, ""people seeking asylum""ù and ""refugee""ù should only be used where such terms are factually correct in connection with the particular individual...."""
Post Reply