Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 221
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 243 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Picjkle now in charge of who

GOOD TIMES 
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer and Pickle »

What exactly is a “comformable” mind”?

I’ve heard of “conformist” but to accuse me of that would be put together with your claims I can’t use English properly, have lost my wife to a karate instructor or have brought up my children to be racists.

Yes, I think “childish bickering” would cover it.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4396
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

More than 100 women & girls were sexually assaulted on NYE ‘16. The perpetrators were largely North Africans.

Pickles response is not to condemn the disgusting men who did it (of their own free choice) but to blame Russia with some mad conspiracy theories.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post stubbo-admin »

I'm bowing out of this thread and trying to police it.

Other mods can decide appropriate course of action for all concerned as it's a no-win position.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 730
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 385 times
Been liked: 256 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

only1billybonds wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:46 ..........we know what we know.
 
 
👍
only1billybonds
Posts: 1891
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Funny ol game this Internet lark. 
A person who consistently and openly defends certain nefarious characters gets called out for his twisted views and goes squealing to the site mods and within hours, all kinds ok warnings are being thrown around. And yet the 'victim' openly issues death threats in full public view and not a single feather is ruffled.

Still, nothing changes, we know what we know.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 730
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 385 times
Been liked: 256 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

goose wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:42
He said that he was reporting ppl last night. It’s since deleted.

 
 
 
 
 
Yep, was following it fella.
Last edited by MaryMillingtonsGhost on 04 Jan 2025, 12:46, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3360
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1815 times
Been liked: 886 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Cabbige Savage" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:32 Juss becose some 1 say they go to authoritys if you not do what they say dos not make it black male
Fukkin Raysist!
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 221
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 243 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Picjkle you still streem Charlton v Redding 3pm at bench

GOOD TIMES 
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:39 Moral panics were first described and analysed in the brilliant study Folk Devils and Moral Panics by Stanley Cohen. I'd say its also textbook reading for Elon Musk, Reform, the Trump GOP and of course Kremlin planners.

https://www.amazon.com/Devils-Moral-Pan ... 0415610168


 
 
 
I find it very amusing that you talk about moral panics and brainwashing of the plebs, but cannot see that yours is precisely the kind of highly conformable mind that cult leaders love to exploit.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4396
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:38
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:28
Of course I’m not blackmailing anyone and have absolutely no complaint about how the site is being moderated right now.
So to be clear fella, you didn't approach the mods?
 
He said that he was reporting ppl last night. It’s since deleted.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:30 When Pickle says 'moral panic', what he really means is ghastly, thick working class people having strong opinions on things that affect their communities. But who cares about them? They don't even have degrees in sociology,  so how can they understand what's good for them?
You really have no mandate to speak for anyone.
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

goose wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:33
Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:28
Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:20 That's a lot of words. Is he blackmailing you? If he is, we will understand your stance.
Of course I’m not blackmailing anyone and have absolutely no complaint about how the site is being moderated right now.
 
You mean after you went crying to the mods like the absolute wet wipe you are? Happy to give it out but run off crying when it comes your way.
 
 
Some years ago. Pickle went through a brief phase of accusing me and my family of being IRA sympathisers. I shrugged it off. I didn't go crying to the mods, because I'm a grown adult.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Moral panics were first described and analysed in the brilliant study Folk Devils and Moral Panics by Stanley Cohen. I'd say its also textbook reading for Elon Musk, Reform, the Trump GOP and of course Kremlin planners.

https://www.amazon.com/Devils-Moral-Pan ... 0415610168
 
Last edited by Hammer and Pickle on 04 Jan 2025, 12:39, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 730
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 385 times
Been liked: 256 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:28
Of course I’m not blackmailing anyone and have absolutely no complaint about how the site is being moderated right now.
So to be clear fella, you didn't approach the mods?
 
 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4396
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:28
Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:20 That's a lot of words. Is he blackmailing you? If he is, we will understand your stance.
Of course I’m not blackmailing anyone and have absolutely no complaint about how the site is being moderated right now.
 
 
You mean after you went crying to the mods like the absolute wet wipe you are? Happy to give it out but run off crying when it comes your way.
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 221
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 243 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Juss becose some 1 say they go to authoritys if you not do what they say dos not make it black male. 
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:28
Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:20 That's a lot of words. Is he blackmailing you? If he is, we will understand your stance.
Of course I’m not blackmailing anyone and have absolutely no complaint about how the site is being moderated right now.
Well of course you have no complaints about the modding. You delibrrately provoke abuse from posters, then run crying to the mods, and they fight your battles for you. 
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

When Pickle says 'moral panic', what he really means is ghastly, thick working class people having strong opinions on things that affect their communities. But who cares about them? They don't even have degrees in sociology,  so how can they understand what's good for them?
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:20 That's a lot of words. Is he blackmailing you? If he is, we will understand your stance.
Of course I’m not blackmailing anyone and have absolutely no complaint about how the site is being moderated right now.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3360
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1815 times
Been liked: 886 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Hammer and Pickle" wrote: 03 Jan 2025, 14:41 I see there is actually quite a lot of cross-party consensus on Musk trying to stoke another moral panic about the grooming gangs. 

Would anyone like provide a little more detail and clarity on what lies he has actually been telling before I have to find out myself?
 
 
"Stoke another moral panic about grooming gangs"

The moral panic was already there by those who were long paying attention to it years ago. Anyone in their right mind would have moral panic and outage over what happened/happens and glad someone high profile is turning up the heat and the spotlight on it.
Leavemyarcelona
Posts: 1117
Old WHO Number: 311212
Has liked: 1102 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Leavemyarcelona »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 11:30 Anyway, if you've all quite finished calling each other paedos, todays geography lesson from Suella Braverman...


 
She meant greece and you know it
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 998
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 398 times
Been liked: 397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

That's a lot of words. Is he blackmailing you? If he is, we will understand your stance.
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:05 I think you're on the wrong side of this one, Stubbo. Over the years, Pickle has repeatedly minimised stories of grooming and sexual assault, including against minors. None of us can pull a C&P'd example on demand because it isn't us that have a 'dossy-yay'. But we have all seen it and argued with him over it.

If your support of Pickle here is only because he is blackmailing you with threats to have the site shut down, then be honest and say so. We would all understand that. But please don't attempt to gaslight us by asserting that he has never posted in support of or minimised the actions of groomers and rapists or the fallout. 
 
 
Rubbish.

I have never minimised any stories of grooming and sexual assault. Instead, I have sought to put them in their proper context, which includes the interests of those who are trying to provoke and incite violence for their own abusive political purposes. There is no minimisation if I do this. In fact it sheds light on exactly how atrocious the crime is on a state level rather than just the personal one. And it does nothing to detract from the personal aspect either.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post stubbo-admin »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 04 Jan 2025, 12:05 I think you're on the wrong side of this one, Stubbo. Over the years, Pickle has repeatedly minimised stories of grooming and sexual assault, including against minors. None of us can pull a C&P'd example on demand because it isn't us that have a 'dossy-yay'. But we have all seen it and argued with him over it.

If your support of Pickle here is only because he is blackmailing you with threats to have the site shut down, then be honest and say so. We would all understand that. But please don't attempt to gaslight us by asserting that he has never posted in support of or minimised the actions of groomers and rapists or the fallout. 
 
 
I have little overall historical context and have no interest in holding views on a specific issue around a specific poster that runs cross-thread.  I've got no 'skin' in the game of this particular topic or argument or interest in taking sides, and  come only at it from trying to run a publicly available forum in which the site's community don't seemingly want us to just shut down anything that moves to the emotive or controversial.

Irrespective the topic or the history, controversial views are a fact of life, and at WHO we've tried to let them be presented.

But as a site we can't support direct targeted abuse against individuals that goes beyond banter for whatever reason, especially when that abuse moves towards what could be considered defamatory and starts to present a potential legal problem for those that are considered site operators (whether enacted or not). 

That's simply the nature of running a publicly visible forum whether the community here likes it or not.

There are other approaches we can of course take that become more heavy handed, but we've tried to avoid that.
Post Reply